号召:行动的号召;全国医学生放射学课程教学情况调查。

IF 1.1 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science Pub Date : 2022-10-10 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.25259/JCIS_36_2022
Scott Andrew Rohren, Serageldin Kamel, Zoha A Khan, Parth Patel, Sammar Ghannam, Akilan Gopal, Peggy H Hsieh, Khaled M Elsayes
{"title":"号召:行动的号召;全国医学生放射学课程教学情况调查。","authors":"Scott Andrew Rohren,&nbsp;Serageldin Kamel,&nbsp;Zoha A Khan,&nbsp;Parth Patel,&nbsp;Sammar Ghannam,&nbsp;Akilan Gopal,&nbsp;Peggy H Hsieh,&nbsp;Khaled M Elsayes","doi":"10.25259/JCIS_36_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Radiology and medical imaging are important yet often an underrepresented facet of medical education. Notably, there is concern among radiologists that students do not receive enough radiology exposure and that they struggle to interpret image findings on entering residency. Therefore, this survey aims to identify how medical students perceive the radiology curriculum and to determine gaps in delivery.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Students were recruited from United States (US) medical schools and given a 21-question survey assessing their perception of the radiology curriculum as well as asking about their confidence levels regarding medical imaging. The inclusion criteria were age >18 and enrolled in US medical school. The surveys were completed in April-July 2020 by students across the US. Objective parameters were measured as percentage correct, while subjective parameters used a 4-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 472 medical students across 31 medical schools completed the surveys with a response rate of 69%. Responses represented all class years within medical schools and showed equal distribution among the future career plans. Students responded that didactic lectures were the most common teaching method and that radiologists were their primary teachers during preclinical education. Students were unfamiliar with the American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria with 65% responding they had never heard of it and 33% reporting that they have heard of it but never used it. In assessing students' perceptions of radiology education, 72% of students responded that they received too little, and 28% of students responded, \"Just right.\" <1% of students responded that there was \"Too much\" radiology in their curriculum.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiologists are increasing their educational representation in medical school curricula. Despite this, radiology continues to be under-represented with students desiring more exposure to medical imaging. Integrating the student's perceptions with existing curricula suggests that efforts should focus on increasing awareness of which studies are appropriate and teaching students how to systematically interpret an image.</p>","PeriodicalId":15512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","volume":" ","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/aa/ef/JCIS-12-57.PMC9610045.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A call to action; national survey of teaching radiology curriculum to medical students.\",\"authors\":\"Scott Andrew Rohren,&nbsp;Serageldin Kamel,&nbsp;Zoha A Khan,&nbsp;Parth Patel,&nbsp;Sammar Ghannam,&nbsp;Akilan Gopal,&nbsp;Peggy H Hsieh,&nbsp;Khaled M Elsayes\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/JCIS_36_2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Radiology and medical imaging are important yet often an underrepresented facet of medical education. Notably, there is concern among radiologists that students do not receive enough radiology exposure and that they struggle to interpret image findings on entering residency. Therefore, this survey aims to identify how medical students perceive the radiology curriculum and to determine gaps in delivery.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Students were recruited from United States (US) medical schools and given a 21-question survey assessing their perception of the radiology curriculum as well as asking about their confidence levels regarding medical imaging. The inclusion criteria were age >18 and enrolled in US medical school. The surveys were completed in April-July 2020 by students across the US. Objective parameters were measured as percentage correct, while subjective parameters used a 4-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 472 medical students across 31 medical schools completed the surveys with a response rate of 69%. Responses represented all class years within medical schools and showed equal distribution among the future career plans. Students responded that didactic lectures were the most common teaching method and that radiologists were their primary teachers during preclinical education. Students were unfamiliar with the American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria with 65% responding they had never heard of it and 33% reporting that they have heard of it but never used it. In assessing students' perceptions of radiology education, 72% of students responded that they received too little, and 28% of students responded, \\\"Just right.\\\" <1% of students responded that there was \\\"Too much\\\" radiology in their curriculum.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiologists are increasing their educational representation in medical school curricula. Despite this, radiology continues to be under-represented with students desiring more exposure to medical imaging. Integrating the student's perceptions with existing curricula suggests that efforts should focus on increasing awareness of which studies are appropriate and teaching students how to systematically interpret an image.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/aa/ef/JCIS-12-57.PMC9610045.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_36_2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_36_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:放射学和医学影像学是重要的,但往往是一个代表性不足的医学教育方面。值得注意的是,放射科医生担心学生没有接受足够的放射照射,并且他们在进入住院医师时很难解释图像结果。因此,本调查旨在确定医学生如何看待放射学课程,并确定交付的差距。材料和方法:从美国医学院招募学生,对他们进行21个问题的调查,评估他们对放射学课程的看法,并询问他们对医学成像的信心程度。纳入标准为年龄>18岁且就读于美国医学院。这些调查于2020年4月至7月由美国各地的学生完成。客观参数以正确率百分比测量,而主观参数使用4点李克特量表。结果:共有31所医学院的472名医学生完成了调查,回复率为69%。回答代表了医学院所有年级的学生,在未来的职业规划中分布均匀。学生回答说,说教式讲座是最常见的教学方法,放射科医生是他们临床前教育的主要老师。学生不熟悉美国放射学会的适当性标准,65%的人回答他们从未听说过,33%的人报告说他们听说过但从未使用过。在评估学生对放射学教育的看法时,72%的学生回答说他们接受的太少,28%的学生回答说“刚刚好”。结论:放射科医师在医学院课程中的教育代表性正在增加。尽管如此,放射学仍然是代表性不足,学生希望更多地接触医学成像。将学生的认知与现有课程相结合表明,努力应侧重于提高学生对哪些研究是合适的认识,并教学生如何系统地解读图像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A call to action; national survey of teaching radiology curriculum to medical students.

A call to action; national survey of teaching radiology curriculum to medical students.

A call to action; national survey of teaching radiology curriculum to medical students.

Objectives: Radiology and medical imaging are important yet often an underrepresented facet of medical education. Notably, there is concern among radiologists that students do not receive enough radiology exposure and that they struggle to interpret image findings on entering residency. Therefore, this survey aims to identify how medical students perceive the radiology curriculum and to determine gaps in delivery.

Material and methods: Students were recruited from United States (US) medical schools and given a 21-question survey assessing their perception of the radiology curriculum as well as asking about their confidence levels regarding medical imaging. The inclusion criteria were age >18 and enrolled in US medical school. The surveys were completed in April-July 2020 by students across the US. Objective parameters were measured as percentage correct, while subjective parameters used a 4-point Likert scale.

Results: A total of 472 medical students across 31 medical schools completed the surveys with a response rate of 69%. Responses represented all class years within medical schools and showed equal distribution among the future career plans. Students responded that didactic lectures were the most common teaching method and that radiologists were their primary teachers during preclinical education. Students were unfamiliar with the American College of Radiology appropriateness criteria with 65% responding they had never heard of it and 33% reporting that they have heard of it but never used it. In assessing students' perceptions of radiology education, 72% of students responded that they received too little, and 28% of students responded, "Just right." <1% of students responded that there was "Too much" radiology in their curriculum.

Conclusion: Radiologists are increasing their educational representation in medical school curricula. Despite this, radiology continues to be under-represented with students desiring more exposure to medical imaging. Integrating the student's perceptions with existing curricula suggests that efforts should focus on increasing awareness of which studies are appropriate and teaching students how to systematically interpret an image.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Imaging Science (JCIS) is an open access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Imaging Science. The journal aims to present Imaging Science and relevant clinical information in an understandable and useful format. The journal is owned and published by the Scientific Scholar. Audience Our audience includes Radiologists, Researchers, Clinicians, medical professionals and students. Review process JCIS has a highly rigorous peer-review process that makes sure that manuscripts are scientifically accurate, relevant, novel and important. Authors disclose all conflicts, affiliations and financial associations such that the published content is not biased.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信