填补空白:copd专用呼吸困难服务的可行性研究。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Kris Mooren, Danielle Wester, Huib Kerstjens, Erik Bergkamp, Anna Spathis, Yvonne Engels
{"title":"填补空白:copd专用呼吸困难服务的可行性研究。","authors":"Kris Mooren,&nbsp;Danielle Wester,&nbsp;Huib Kerstjens,&nbsp;Erik Bergkamp,&nbsp;Anna Spathis,&nbsp;Yvonne Engels","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2022.2099821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Refractory breathlessness is a devastating symptom in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Symptom-focused breathlessness services, involving palliative care teams, offer individualized support but are not yet widely available for people with nonmalignant disease among which COPD. Our primary aim was to demonstrate the feasibility of setting up a breathlessness service specifically for COPD patients within a respiratory outpatient clinic. Our secondary aims were to assess how many sessions patients need to complete the intervention; to obtain an indication of effect size (on the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ), subset mastery domain); and to evaluate patient and professional satisfaction. We conducted a non-randomized single-center feasibility study. Participants had COPD and refractory breathlessness. During at least one session with a respiratory nurse and a pulmonologist, and one session with a physiotherapist, patients learned non-pharmacological interventions to manage breathlessness. Of 34 screened patients, 19 were included. All completed the intervention. A median of two clinical visits and two telephone calls were needed to complete the intervention. The mean improvement of 1.55 in CRQ, mastery domain, significantly exceeded the clinically important difference of 0.5. The service was rated as excellent by the eight patients who completed the survey. The health professional team gave positive feedback on the experience of delivering the intervention. Delivery of a breathlessness service for COPD outpatients with refractory breathlessness appears feasible, easy to implement in a respiratory outpatient clinic, and has the potential to be effective. A randomized controlled clinical trial is needed to test effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":" ","pages":"324-329"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Filling the Gap: A Feasibility Study of a COPD-Specific Breathlessness Service.\",\"authors\":\"Kris Mooren,&nbsp;Danielle Wester,&nbsp;Huib Kerstjens,&nbsp;Erik Bergkamp,&nbsp;Anna Spathis,&nbsp;Yvonne Engels\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15412555.2022.2099821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Refractory breathlessness is a devastating symptom in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Symptom-focused breathlessness services, involving palliative care teams, offer individualized support but are not yet widely available for people with nonmalignant disease among which COPD. Our primary aim was to demonstrate the feasibility of setting up a breathlessness service specifically for COPD patients within a respiratory outpatient clinic. Our secondary aims were to assess how many sessions patients need to complete the intervention; to obtain an indication of effect size (on the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ), subset mastery domain); and to evaluate patient and professional satisfaction. We conducted a non-randomized single-center feasibility study. Participants had COPD and refractory breathlessness. During at least one session with a respiratory nurse and a pulmonologist, and one session with a physiotherapist, patients learned non-pharmacological interventions to manage breathlessness. Of 34 screened patients, 19 were included. All completed the intervention. A median of two clinical visits and two telephone calls were needed to complete the intervention. The mean improvement of 1.55 in CRQ, mastery domain, significantly exceeded the clinically important difference of 0.5. The service was rated as excellent by the eight patients who completed the survey. The health professional team gave positive feedback on the experience of delivering the intervention. Delivery of a breathlessness service for COPD outpatients with refractory breathlessness appears feasible, easy to implement in a respiratory outpatient clinic, and has the potential to be effective. A randomized controlled clinical trial is needed to test effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in this context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"324-329\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2022.2099821\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2022.2099821","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

难治性呼吸困难是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的一种破坏性症状。以症状为重点的呼吸困难服务,包括姑息治疗团队,提供个性化支持,但尚未广泛适用于COPD等非恶性疾病患者。我们的主要目的是证明在呼吸门诊专门为COPD患者设立呼吸困难服务的可行性。我们的次要目的是评估患者需要多少疗程来完成干预;获得效应大小的指示(慢性呼吸问卷(CRQ),子集掌握域);评估病人和职业满意度。我们进行了一项非随机单中心可行性研究。参与者患有COPD和难治性呼吸困难。在至少一次与呼吸系统护士和肺科医生以及一次与物理治疗师的会面中,患者学会了非药物干预来控制呼吸困难。在34名被筛选的患者中,有19名被纳入。所有人都完成了干预。完成干预的中位数为两次临床访问和两次电话。掌握域CRQ平均改善1.55,显著高于临床重要差异0.5。完成调查的8名患者认为这项服务非常好。健康专业团队对提供干预的经验给予了积极的反馈。为难治性呼吸困难的COPD门诊患者提供呼吸困难服务似乎是可行的,易于在呼吸门诊实施,并且具有有效的潜力。需要一项随机对照临床试验来测试在这种情况下的有效性和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Filling the Gap: A Feasibility Study of a COPD-Specific Breathlessness Service.

Refractory breathlessness is a devastating symptom in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Symptom-focused breathlessness services, involving palliative care teams, offer individualized support but are not yet widely available for people with nonmalignant disease among which COPD. Our primary aim was to demonstrate the feasibility of setting up a breathlessness service specifically for COPD patients within a respiratory outpatient clinic. Our secondary aims were to assess how many sessions patients need to complete the intervention; to obtain an indication of effect size (on the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ), subset mastery domain); and to evaluate patient and professional satisfaction. We conducted a non-randomized single-center feasibility study. Participants had COPD and refractory breathlessness. During at least one session with a respiratory nurse and a pulmonologist, and one session with a physiotherapist, patients learned non-pharmacological interventions to manage breathlessness. Of 34 screened patients, 19 were included. All completed the intervention. A median of two clinical visits and two telephone calls were needed to complete the intervention. The mean improvement of 1.55 in CRQ, mastery domain, significantly exceeded the clinically important difference of 0.5. The service was rated as excellent by the eight patients who completed the survey. The health professional team gave positive feedback on the experience of delivering the intervention. Delivery of a breathlessness service for COPD outpatients with refractory breathlessness appears feasible, easy to implement in a respiratory outpatient clinic, and has the potential to be effective. A randomized controlled clinical trial is needed to test effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in this context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From pathophysiology and cell biology to pharmacology and psychosocial impact, COPD: Journal Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease publishes a wide range of original research, reviews, case studies, and conference proceedings to promote advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and control of lung and airway disease and inflammation - providing a unique forum for the discussion, design, and evaluation of more efficient and effective strategies in patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信