印度利妥昔单抗生物类似药质量国家控制实验室评价。

Q3 Medicine
Nripendra Nath Mishra, Anu Sharma, Swati Shalini, Sonia Sharma, Paras Jain, Ratnesh K Sharma, Harish Chander, J P Prasad, Anupkumar R Anvikar, Subhash Chand
{"title":"印度利妥昔单抗生物类似药质量国家控制实验室评价。","authors":"Nripendra Nath Mishra,&nbsp;Anu Sharma,&nbsp;Swati Shalini,&nbsp;Sonia Sharma,&nbsp;Paras Jain,&nbsp;Ratnesh K Sharma,&nbsp;Harish Chander,&nbsp;J P Prasad,&nbsp;Anupkumar R Anvikar,&nbsp;Subhash Chand","doi":"10.1089/mab.2021.0066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In past few years many rituximab (RTX) biosimilars have been launched in India. Biosimilars are products that are similar in terms of quality, safety, and efficacy to its innovator product and are expected to offer improved affordability. The less clinical examination is a significant source of reduction in the cost of development of a biosimilar. However, this clinical relief is predicated on the assumption that there is analytical similarity between the biosimilar and the innovator product. Therefore, the role of National Control Laboratory become very important to ensure the quality of these drugs by carrying out analytical characterization at the point of drug product release level as when referred by National Regulatory Authority for quality evaluation. To assess the similarity between innovator and biosimilars, different physicochemical and biological quality attributes were assessed. A multitude of state-of-the-art analysis of <i>N</i> = 3 RTX biosimilars marketed in India revealed that the impurity profiles of these biosimilars measured by charge variant analysis (cation exchange chromatography-high performance liquid chromatography [HPLC], capillary zone electrophoresis, and capillary isoelectric focusing), aggregates profiling (size exclusion chromatography-HPLC), fragments analysis (capillary electrophoresis-sodium dodecyl sulfate) were found to be significantly varying as compared with the innovator product. There were significant variations in acidic variants (<i>p</i> = 0.023) and basic variants (<i>p</i> = 0.0005), isoelectric point value (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), aggregates (<i>p</i> = 0.0231), and fragments (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) of biosimilars were found as that of innovator product. However, these differences were not affecting the biological activity in the cell-based potency analysis by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay (<i>p</i> = 0.1026), antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) (<i>p</i> = 0.3736), and binding assay by flow cytometer fluorescence-activated cell sorting (<i>p</i> = 0.4005) of these biosimilars as compared with the innovator product.</p>","PeriodicalId":53514,"journal":{"name":"Monoclonal Antibodies in Immunodiagnosis and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National Control Laboratory Assessment of Quality of Rituximab Biosimilars in India.\",\"authors\":\"Nripendra Nath Mishra,&nbsp;Anu Sharma,&nbsp;Swati Shalini,&nbsp;Sonia Sharma,&nbsp;Paras Jain,&nbsp;Ratnesh K Sharma,&nbsp;Harish Chander,&nbsp;J P Prasad,&nbsp;Anupkumar R Anvikar,&nbsp;Subhash Chand\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/mab.2021.0066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In past few years many rituximab (RTX) biosimilars have been launched in India. Biosimilars are products that are similar in terms of quality, safety, and efficacy to its innovator product and are expected to offer improved affordability. The less clinical examination is a significant source of reduction in the cost of development of a biosimilar. However, this clinical relief is predicated on the assumption that there is analytical similarity between the biosimilar and the innovator product. Therefore, the role of National Control Laboratory become very important to ensure the quality of these drugs by carrying out analytical characterization at the point of drug product release level as when referred by National Regulatory Authority for quality evaluation. To assess the similarity between innovator and biosimilars, different physicochemical and biological quality attributes were assessed. A multitude of state-of-the-art analysis of <i>N</i> = 3 RTX biosimilars marketed in India revealed that the impurity profiles of these biosimilars measured by charge variant analysis (cation exchange chromatography-high performance liquid chromatography [HPLC], capillary zone electrophoresis, and capillary isoelectric focusing), aggregates profiling (size exclusion chromatography-HPLC), fragments analysis (capillary electrophoresis-sodium dodecyl sulfate) were found to be significantly varying as compared with the innovator product. There were significant variations in acidic variants (<i>p</i> = 0.023) and basic variants (<i>p</i> = 0.0005), isoelectric point value (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), aggregates (<i>p</i> = 0.0231), and fragments (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) of biosimilars were found as that of innovator product. However, these differences were not affecting the biological activity in the cell-based potency analysis by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay (<i>p</i> = 0.1026), antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) (<i>p</i> = 0.3736), and binding assay by flow cytometer fluorescence-activated cell sorting (<i>p</i> = 0.4005) of these biosimilars as compared with the innovator product.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monoclonal Antibodies in Immunodiagnosis and Immunotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monoclonal Antibodies in Immunodiagnosis and Immunotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/mab.2021.0066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monoclonal Antibodies in Immunodiagnosis and Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/mab.2021.0066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几年里,许多利妥昔单抗(RTX)生物仿制药已经在印度上市。生物仿制药是指在质量、安全性和有效性方面与创新产品相似的产品,并有望提供更高的可负担性。较少的临床检查是降低生物仿制药开发成本的一个重要来源。然而,这种临床缓解是基于生物仿制药和创新产品之间存在分析相似性的假设。因此,国家控制实验室的作用变得非常重要,当国家监管部门要求进行质量评价时,通过在药品放行水平上进行分析表征来确保这些药物的质量。为了评估创新产品与生物仿制药之间的相似性,对不同的物理化学和生物质量属性进行了评估。对在印度上市的N = 3 RTX生物仿制药的大量最新分析表明,这些生物仿制药的杂质谱通过电荷变异分析(阳离子交换色谱-高效液相色谱[HPLC],毛细管区带电泳和毛细管等电聚焦),聚集体谱(尺寸排除色谱-HPLC),片段分析(毛细管电泳-十二烷基硫酸钠)发现与创新产品相比有显著差异。与创新产品相比,这些生物类似药的酸性变体(p = 0.023)和碱性变体(p = 0.0005)、等电点值(p = 0.0231)和片段(p = 0.1026)、抗体依赖细胞介导的细胞毒性(p = 0.3736)以及流式细胞仪荧光激活细胞分选的结合试验(p = 0.4005)都存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
National Control Laboratory Assessment of Quality of Rituximab Biosimilars in India.

In past few years many rituximab (RTX) biosimilars have been launched in India. Biosimilars are products that are similar in terms of quality, safety, and efficacy to its innovator product and are expected to offer improved affordability. The less clinical examination is a significant source of reduction in the cost of development of a biosimilar. However, this clinical relief is predicated on the assumption that there is analytical similarity between the biosimilar and the innovator product. Therefore, the role of National Control Laboratory become very important to ensure the quality of these drugs by carrying out analytical characterization at the point of drug product release level as when referred by National Regulatory Authority for quality evaluation. To assess the similarity between innovator and biosimilars, different physicochemical and biological quality attributes were assessed. A multitude of state-of-the-art analysis of N = 3 RTX biosimilars marketed in India revealed that the impurity profiles of these biosimilars measured by charge variant analysis (cation exchange chromatography-high performance liquid chromatography [HPLC], capillary zone electrophoresis, and capillary isoelectric focusing), aggregates profiling (size exclusion chromatography-HPLC), fragments analysis (capillary electrophoresis-sodium dodecyl sulfate) were found to be significantly varying as compared with the innovator product. There were significant variations in acidic variants (p = 0.023) and basic variants (p = 0.0005), isoelectric point value (p < 0.0001), aggregates (p = 0.0231), and fragments (p < 0.0001) of biosimilars were found as that of innovator product. However, these differences were not affecting the biological activity in the cell-based potency analysis by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assay (p = 0.1026), antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) (p = 0.3736), and binding assay by flow cytometer fluorescence-activated cell sorting (p = 0.4005) of these biosimilars as compared with the innovator product.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信