使用ClearSight系统对产后出血高危孕妇进行无创持续血压监测:与剖宫产术中有创血压监测的比较

Obstetrics & gynecology science Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-27 DOI:10.5468/ogs.22063
Takuya Misugi, Takashi Juri, Koichi Suehiro, Kohei Kitada, Yasushi Kurihara, Mie Tahara, Akihiro Hamuro, Akemi Nakano, Masayasu Koyama, Takasi Mori, Daisuke Tachibana
{"title":"使用ClearSight系统对产后出血高危孕妇进行无创持续血压监测:与剖宫产术中有创血压监测的比较","authors":"Takuya Misugi,&nbsp;Takashi Juri,&nbsp;Koichi Suehiro,&nbsp;Kohei Kitada,&nbsp;Yasushi Kurihara,&nbsp;Mie Tahara,&nbsp;Akihiro Hamuro,&nbsp;Akemi Nakano,&nbsp;Masayasu Koyama,&nbsp;Takasi Mori,&nbsp;Daisuke Tachibana","doi":"10.5468/ogs.22063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and precision of continuous, non-invasive blood pressure obtained using the ClearSight system by comparing it with invasive arterial blood pressure, and to assess the hemodynamic changes using invasive methods and the ClearSight system in patients undergoing cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Arterial pressure was measured invasively with an intra-arterial catheter and non-invasively using the ClearSight system during cesarean section in patients with placenta previa or placenta accreta. Blood pressure measurements obtained using these two means were then compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 1,277 blood pressure measurement pairs were collected from 21 patients. Under Bland-Altman analysis, the ClearSight system demonstrated an acceptable accuracy with a bias and standard deviation of 8.8±13.4 mmHg for systolic blood pressure, -6.3±7.1 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure, and -2.7±8.0 mmHg for median blood pressure. Cardiac index levels were significantly elevated during fetal delivery and 5 minutes after placental removal, and systemic vascular resistance index levels were significantly decreased during fetal delivery and 40 minutes after placental removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing cesarean section, the ClearSight system showed excellent accuracy and precision compared to that of the currently used invasive monitoring system.</p>","PeriodicalId":520726,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & gynecology science","volume":" ","pages":"325-334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/f7/ogs-22063.PMC9304436.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring using the ClearSight system for pregnant women at high risks of post-partum hemorrhage: comparison with invasive blood pressure monitoring during cesarean section.\",\"authors\":\"Takuya Misugi,&nbsp;Takashi Juri,&nbsp;Koichi Suehiro,&nbsp;Kohei Kitada,&nbsp;Yasushi Kurihara,&nbsp;Mie Tahara,&nbsp;Akihiro Hamuro,&nbsp;Akemi Nakano,&nbsp;Masayasu Koyama,&nbsp;Takasi Mori,&nbsp;Daisuke Tachibana\",\"doi\":\"10.5468/ogs.22063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and precision of continuous, non-invasive blood pressure obtained using the ClearSight system by comparing it with invasive arterial blood pressure, and to assess the hemodynamic changes using invasive methods and the ClearSight system in patients undergoing cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Arterial pressure was measured invasively with an intra-arterial catheter and non-invasively using the ClearSight system during cesarean section in patients with placenta previa or placenta accreta. Blood pressure measurements obtained using these two means were then compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total 1,277 blood pressure measurement pairs were collected from 21 patients. Under Bland-Altman analysis, the ClearSight system demonstrated an acceptable accuracy with a bias and standard deviation of 8.8±13.4 mmHg for systolic blood pressure, -6.3±7.1 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure, and -2.7±8.0 mmHg for median blood pressure. Cardiac index levels were significantly elevated during fetal delivery and 5 minutes after placental removal, and systemic vascular resistance index levels were significantly decreased during fetal delivery and 40 minutes after placental removal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing cesarean section, the ClearSight system showed excellent accuracy and precision compared to that of the currently used invasive monitoring system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics & gynecology science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"325-334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/09/f7/ogs-22063.PMC9304436.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics & gynecology science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.22063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & gynecology science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.22063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过与有创动脉血压的比较,探讨ClearSight系统获得的连续无创血压的准确性和精密度,并评价有创方法和ClearSight系统对剖宫产患者血流动力学的改变。方法:采用有创动脉导管测量动脉压,无创ClearSight系统测量前置胎盘或增生胎盘剖宫产患者的动脉压。然后比较使用这两种方法获得的血压测量值。结果:共采集21例患者血压测量对1277对。在Bland-Altman分析中,ClearSight系统显示出可接受的准确性,收缩压的偏差和标准偏差为8.8±13.4 mmHg,舒张压的偏差为-6.3±7.1 mmHg,中位血压的偏差为-2.7±8.0 mmHg。胎儿分娩和胎盘切除后5分钟心脏指数水平显著升高,胎儿分娩和胎盘切除后40分钟全身血管阻力指数水平显著降低。结论:在剖宫产术中,ClearSight系统较目前使用的有创监测系统具有较好的准确性和精密度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring using the ClearSight system for pregnant women at high risks of post-partum hemorrhage: comparison with invasive blood pressure monitoring during cesarean section.

Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring using the ClearSight system for pregnant women at high risks of post-partum hemorrhage: comparison with invasive blood pressure monitoring during cesarean section.

Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring using the ClearSight system for pregnant women at high risks of post-partum hemorrhage: comparison with invasive blood pressure monitoring during cesarean section.

Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring using the ClearSight system for pregnant women at high risks of post-partum hemorrhage: comparison with invasive blood pressure monitoring during cesarean section.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy and precision of continuous, non-invasive blood pressure obtained using the ClearSight system by comparing it with invasive arterial blood pressure, and to assess the hemodynamic changes using invasive methods and the ClearSight system in patients undergoing cesarean section.

Methods: Arterial pressure was measured invasively with an intra-arterial catheter and non-invasively using the ClearSight system during cesarean section in patients with placenta previa or placenta accreta. Blood pressure measurements obtained using these two means were then compared.

Results: Total 1,277 blood pressure measurement pairs were collected from 21 patients. Under Bland-Altman analysis, the ClearSight system demonstrated an acceptable accuracy with a bias and standard deviation of 8.8±13.4 mmHg for systolic blood pressure, -6.3±7.1 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure, and -2.7±8.0 mmHg for median blood pressure. Cardiac index levels were significantly elevated during fetal delivery and 5 minutes after placental removal, and systemic vascular resistance index levels were significantly decreased during fetal delivery and 40 minutes after placental removal.

Conclusion: In patients undergoing cesarean section, the ClearSight system showed excellent accuracy and precision compared to that of the currently used invasive monitoring system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信