管理活体肾脏捐献后常规随访护理的费用:当代经验、实践和挑战的回顾和调查。

IF 2.4 Q2 SURGERY
Current Transplantation Reports Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-22 DOI:10.1007/s40472-022-00379-w
Krista L Lentine, Nagaraju Sarabu, Gwen McNatt, Robert Howey, Rebecca Hays, Christie P Thomas, Ursula Lebron-Banks, Linda Ohler, Cody Wooley, Addie Wisniewski, Huiling Xiao, Andrea Tietjen
{"title":"管理活体肾脏捐献后常规随访护理的费用:当代经验、实践和挑战的回顾和调查。","authors":"Krista L Lentine,&nbsp;Nagaraju Sarabu,&nbsp;Gwen McNatt,&nbsp;Robert Howey,&nbsp;Rebecca Hays,&nbsp;Christie P Thomas,&nbsp;Ursula Lebron-Banks,&nbsp;Linda Ohler,&nbsp;Cody Wooley,&nbsp;Addie Wisniewski,&nbsp;Huiling Xiao,&nbsp;Andrea Tietjen","doi":"10.1007/s40472-022-00379-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>While living organ donor follow-up is mandated for 2 years in the USA, formal guidance on recovering associated costs of follow-up care is lacking. In this review, we discuss current billing practices of transplant programs for living kidney donor follow-up, and propose future directions for managing follow-up costs and supporting cost neutrality in donor care.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Living donors may incur costs and financial risks in the donation process, including travel, lost time from work, and dependent care. In addition, adherence to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) mandate for US transplant programs to submit 6-, 12-, and 24-month postdonation follow-up data to the national registry may incur out-of-pocket medical costs for donors. Notably, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has explicitly disallowed transplant programs to bill routine, mandated follow-up costs to the organ acquisition cost center or to the recipient's Medicare insurance. We conducted a survey of transplant staff in the USA (distributed October 22, 2020-March 15, 2021), which identified that the mechanisms for recovering or covering the costs of mandated routine postdonation follow-up at responding programs commonly include billing recipients' private insurance (40%), while 41% bill recipients' Medicare insurance. Many programs reported utilizing institutional allowancing (up to 50%), and some programs billed the organ acquisition cost center (25%). A small percentage (11%) reported billing donors or donors' insurance.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>To maintain a high level of adherence to living donor follow-up without financially burdening donors, up-to-date resources are needed on handling routine donor follow-up costs in ways that are policy-compliant and effective for donors and programs. Development of a government-supported national living donor follow-up registry like the Living Donor Collective may provide solutions for aspects of postdonation follow-up, but requires transplant program commitment to register donors and donor candidates as well as donor engagement with follow-up outreach contacts after donation.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40472-022-00379-w.</p>","PeriodicalId":36387,"journal":{"name":"Current Transplantation Reports","volume":" ","pages":"328-335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing the Costs of Routine Follow-up Care After Living Kidney Donation: a Review and Survey of Contemporary Experience, Practices, and Challenges.\",\"authors\":\"Krista L Lentine,&nbsp;Nagaraju Sarabu,&nbsp;Gwen McNatt,&nbsp;Robert Howey,&nbsp;Rebecca Hays,&nbsp;Christie P Thomas,&nbsp;Ursula Lebron-Banks,&nbsp;Linda Ohler,&nbsp;Cody Wooley,&nbsp;Addie Wisniewski,&nbsp;Huiling Xiao,&nbsp;Andrea Tietjen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40472-022-00379-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>While living organ donor follow-up is mandated for 2 years in the USA, formal guidance on recovering associated costs of follow-up care is lacking. In this review, we discuss current billing practices of transplant programs for living kidney donor follow-up, and propose future directions for managing follow-up costs and supporting cost neutrality in donor care.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Living donors may incur costs and financial risks in the donation process, including travel, lost time from work, and dependent care. In addition, adherence to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) mandate for US transplant programs to submit 6-, 12-, and 24-month postdonation follow-up data to the national registry may incur out-of-pocket medical costs for donors. Notably, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has explicitly disallowed transplant programs to bill routine, mandated follow-up costs to the organ acquisition cost center or to the recipient's Medicare insurance. We conducted a survey of transplant staff in the USA (distributed October 22, 2020-March 15, 2021), which identified that the mechanisms for recovering or covering the costs of mandated routine postdonation follow-up at responding programs commonly include billing recipients' private insurance (40%), while 41% bill recipients' Medicare insurance. Many programs reported utilizing institutional allowancing (up to 50%), and some programs billed the organ acquisition cost center (25%). A small percentage (11%) reported billing donors or donors' insurance.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>To maintain a high level of adherence to living donor follow-up without financially burdening donors, up-to-date resources are needed on handling routine donor follow-up costs in ways that are policy-compliant and effective for donors and programs. Development of a government-supported national living donor follow-up registry like the Living Donor Collective may provide solutions for aspects of postdonation follow-up, but requires transplant program commitment to register donors and donor candidates as well as donor engagement with follow-up outreach contacts after donation.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40472-022-00379-w.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Transplantation Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"328-335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9510404/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Transplantation Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40472-022-00379-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Transplantation Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40472-022-00379-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:在美国,活体器官供者随访2年是强制性的,但缺乏关于回收随访护理相关费用的正式指导。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了活体肾供者随访移植项目的当前计费做法,并提出了管理随访成本和支持供者护理成本中立的未来方向。最近的研究发现:活体捐献者在捐赠过程中可能会产生费用和财务风险,包括旅行、失去工作时间和受抚养人的照顾。此外,遵守器官获取和移植网络(OPTN)对美国移植项目的授权,向国家登记处提交捐赠后6个月、12个月和24个月的随访数据,可能会给捐赠者带来自付医疗费用。值得注意的是,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)明确禁止移植项目将常规的、强制性的后续费用支付给器官获取成本中心或接受者的医疗保险。我们对美国的移植工作人员进行了一项调查(分布于2020年10月22日至2021年3月15日),调查发现,在响应项目中,恢复或支付强制性捐献后常规随访费用的机制通常包括账单接受者的私人保险(40%),而41%的账单接受者的医疗保险。许多项目报告使用了机构补贴(高达50%),一些项目向器官获取成本中心收费(25%)。一小部分(11%)报告了向捐赠者或捐赠者的保险付款。摘要:为了在不给捐赠者带来经济负担的情况下保持对活体捐赠者随访的高度坚持,需要以符合政策并对捐赠者和项目有效的方式处理日常捐赠者随访费用的最新资源。发展一个由政府支持的国家活体捐赠者随访登记系统,如活体捐赠者集体,可能会为捐赠后的随访提供解决方案,但需要移植项目承诺登记捐赠者和捐赠者候选人,以及捐赠者参与捐赠后的后续联系。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,提供地址:10.1007/s40472-022-00379-w。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Managing the Costs of Routine Follow-up Care After Living Kidney Donation: a Review and Survey of Contemporary Experience, Practices, and Challenges.

Managing the Costs of Routine Follow-up Care After Living Kidney Donation: a Review and Survey of Contemporary Experience, Practices, and Challenges.

Managing the Costs of Routine Follow-up Care After Living Kidney Donation: a Review and Survey of Contemporary Experience, Practices, and Challenges.

Purpose of review: While living organ donor follow-up is mandated for 2 years in the USA, formal guidance on recovering associated costs of follow-up care is lacking. In this review, we discuss current billing practices of transplant programs for living kidney donor follow-up, and propose future directions for managing follow-up costs and supporting cost neutrality in donor care.

Recent findings: Living donors may incur costs and financial risks in the donation process, including travel, lost time from work, and dependent care. In addition, adherence to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) mandate for US transplant programs to submit 6-, 12-, and 24-month postdonation follow-up data to the national registry may incur out-of-pocket medical costs for donors. Notably, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has explicitly disallowed transplant programs to bill routine, mandated follow-up costs to the organ acquisition cost center or to the recipient's Medicare insurance. We conducted a survey of transplant staff in the USA (distributed October 22, 2020-March 15, 2021), which identified that the mechanisms for recovering or covering the costs of mandated routine postdonation follow-up at responding programs commonly include billing recipients' private insurance (40%), while 41% bill recipients' Medicare insurance. Many programs reported utilizing institutional allowancing (up to 50%), and some programs billed the organ acquisition cost center (25%). A small percentage (11%) reported billing donors or donors' insurance.

Summary: To maintain a high level of adherence to living donor follow-up without financially burdening donors, up-to-date resources are needed on handling routine donor follow-up costs in ways that are policy-compliant and effective for donors and programs. Development of a government-supported national living donor follow-up registry like the Living Donor Collective may provide solutions for aspects of postdonation follow-up, but requires transplant program commitment to register donors and donor candidates as well as donor engagement with follow-up outreach contacts after donation.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40472-022-00379-w.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Under the guidance of Dr. Dorry Segev, from Johns Hopkins, Current Transplantation Reports will provide an in-depth review of topics covering kidney, liver, and pancreatic transplantation in addition to immunology and composite allografts.We accomplish this aim by inviting international authorities to contribute review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists.  By providing clear, insightful balanced contributions, the journal intends to serve those involved in the field of transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信