Mohammed Alawad;Hong-Jun Yoon;Shang Gao;Brent Mumphrey;Xiao-Cheng Wu;Eric B. Durbin;Jong Cheol Jeong;Isaac Hands;David Rust;Linda Coyle;Lynne Penberthy;Georgia Tourassi
{"title":"癌症注册中心的保密深度学习NLP模型","authors":"Mohammed Alawad;Hong-Jun Yoon;Shang Gao;Brent Mumphrey;Xiao-Cheng Wu;Eric B. Durbin;Jong Cheol Jeong;Isaac Hands;David Rust;Linda Coyle;Lynne Penberthy;Georgia Tourassi","doi":"10.1109/TETC.2020.2983404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Population cancer registries can benefit from Deep Learning (DL) to automatically extract cancer characteristics from the high volume of unstructured pathology text reports they process annually. The success of DL to tackle this and other real-world problems is proportional to the availability of large labeled datasets for model training. Although collaboration among cancer registries is essential to fully exploit the promise of DL, privacy and confidentiality concerns are main obstacles for data sharing across cancer registries. Moreover, DL for natural language processing (NLP) requires sharing a vocabulary dictionary for the embedding layer which may contain patient identifiers. Thus, even distributing the trained models across cancer registries causes a privacy violation issue. In this article, we propose DL NLP model distribution via privacy-preserving transfer learning approaches without sharing sensitive data. These approaches are used to distribute a multitask convolutional neural network (MT-CNN) NLP model among cancer registries. The model is trained to extract six key cancer characteristics – tumor site, subsite, laterality, behavior, histology, and grade – from cancer pathology reports. Using 410,064 pathology documents from two cancer registries, we compare our proposed approach to conventional transfer learning without privacy-preserving, single-registry models, and a model trained on centrally hosted data. The results show that transfer learning approaches including data sharing and model distribution outperform significantly the single-registry model. In addition, the best performing privacy-preserving model distribution approach achieves statistically indistinguishable average micro- and macro-F1 scores across all extraction tasks (0.823,0.580) as compared to the centralized model (0.827,0.585).","PeriodicalId":13156,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing","volume":"9 3","pages":"1219-1230"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/TETC.2020.2983404","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy-Preserving Deep Learning NLP Models for Cancer Registries\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Alawad;Hong-Jun Yoon;Shang Gao;Brent Mumphrey;Xiao-Cheng Wu;Eric B. Durbin;Jong Cheol Jeong;Isaac Hands;David Rust;Linda Coyle;Lynne Penberthy;Georgia Tourassi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TETC.2020.2983404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Population cancer registries can benefit from Deep Learning (DL) to automatically extract cancer characteristics from the high volume of unstructured pathology text reports they process annually. The success of DL to tackle this and other real-world problems is proportional to the availability of large labeled datasets for model training. Although collaboration among cancer registries is essential to fully exploit the promise of DL, privacy and confidentiality concerns are main obstacles for data sharing across cancer registries. Moreover, DL for natural language processing (NLP) requires sharing a vocabulary dictionary for the embedding layer which may contain patient identifiers. Thus, even distributing the trained models across cancer registries causes a privacy violation issue. In this article, we propose DL NLP model distribution via privacy-preserving transfer learning approaches without sharing sensitive data. These approaches are used to distribute a multitask convolutional neural network (MT-CNN) NLP model among cancer registries. The model is trained to extract six key cancer characteristics – tumor site, subsite, laterality, behavior, histology, and grade – from cancer pathology reports. Using 410,064 pathology documents from two cancer registries, we compare our proposed approach to conventional transfer learning without privacy-preserving, single-registry models, and a model trained on centrally hosted data. The results show that transfer learning approaches including data sharing and model distribution outperform significantly the single-registry model. In addition, the best performing privacy-preserving model distribution approach achieves statistically indistinguishable average micro- and macro-F1 scores across all extraction tasks (0.823,0.580) as compared to the centralized model (0.827,0.585).\",\"PeriodicalId\":13156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"1219-1230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1109/TETC.2020.2983404\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9069186/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9069186/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Privacy-Preserving Deep Learning NLP Models for Cancer Registries
Population cancer registries can benefit from Deep Learning (DL) to automatically extract cancer characteristics from the high volume of unstructured pathology text reports they process annually. The success of DL to tackle this and other real-world problems is proportional to the availability of large labeled datasets for model training. Although collaboration among cancer registries is essential to fully exploit the promise of DL, privacy and confidentiality concerns are main obstacles for data sharing across cancer registries. Moreover, DL for natural language processing (NLP) requires sharing a vocabulary dictionary for the embedding layer which may contain patient identifiers. Thus, even distributing the trained models across cancer registries causes a privacy violation issue. In this article, we propose DL NLP model distribution via privacy-preserving transfer learning approaches without sharing sensitive data. These approaches are used to distribute a multitask convolutional neural network (MT-CNN) NLP model among cancer registries. The model is trained to extract six key cancer characteristics – tumor site, subsite, laterality, behavior, histology, and grade – from cancer pathology reports. Using 410,064 pathology documents from two cancer registries, we compare our proposed approach to conventional transfer learning without privacy-preserving, single-registry models, and a model trained on centrally hosted data. The results show that transfer learning approaches including data sharing and model distribution outperform significantly the single-registry model. In addition, the best performing privacy-preserving model distribution approach achieves statistically indistinguishable average micro- and macro-F1 scores across all extraction tasks (0.823,0.580) as compared to the centralized model (0.827,0.585).
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing publishes papers on emerging aspects of computer science, computing technology, and computing applications not currently covered by other IEEE Computer Society Transactions. Some examples of emerging topics in computing include: IT for Green, Synthetic and organic computing structures and systems, Advanced analytics, Social/occupational computing, Location-based/client computer systems, Morphic computer design, Electronic game systems, & Health-care IT.