2019冠状病毒病中心教学医院封锁期间妇产科急诊科活动

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Obstetrics and Gynecology International Pub Date : 2022-09-05 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/7557628
R Amadori, R Buscemi, A Desando, F Grillo, V Remorgida, D Surico
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病中心教学医院封锁期间妇产科急诊科活动","authors":"R Amadori,&nbsp;R Buscemi,&nbsp;A Desando,&nbsp;F Grillo,&nbsp;V Remorgida,&nbsp;D Surico","doi":"10.1155/2022/7557628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lockdown related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has imposed profound changes in the interaction of the population with hospitals and emergency departments. The main aim of this research was to evaluate the impact of lockdown on the activity of obstetrics and gynecology emergency department (OGED) in a teaching hospital, hub center, for COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study considers all visits to the OGED with their different triage color codes that represent the clinical severity of each case (from the most severe to the least one: red, yellow, green, white). Data were selected through the \"PSNet\" triage program and collected anonymously. We analyzed frequency distributions of the variables separately for each woman and calculated mean and standard deviations for continuous variables. We then analyzed the association between factors and outcomes for categorical variables (expressed as a number and percentage of the total) using the chi-square test (<i>χ</i>2). The level of significance was established with <i>p</i> < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics V20.0. Given the fact that the study has a retrospective observational nature and it is based on an anonymous routine database, approval by the Local Ethics Committee was not necessary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relative decrease of patients presenting to OGED in 2020 was -50.96%. The percentage of nonpregnant women was significantly lower in 2020 compared to 2019 (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001; Δ = -79.46%). Regarding the obstetric group, we saw an important decrease of visits in 2020 compared to 2019 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001; Δ = -40%). The prevalence of yellow codes was significantly higher in 2020 (Δ = +29.72%), while that of white (Δ = -61.58%) and green (Δ = -52.22%) codes was significantly lower (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001). Comparing the diagnoses at discharge, we could highlight significant reductions in 2020 for more than one diagnosis: bleeding (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001; Δ = -70.42%), pain (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001; Δ = -81.22%), urinary diseases (<i>p</i> = 0.004; Δ = -75.64%), and gastrointestinal diseases (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001; Δ = -87.50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An evident change emerged in relation to the dynamics between the local obstetrical and gynecological population, and OGED resources. The COVID-19 lockdown greatly reduced the rate of admission to OGED without time-related obstetric and gynecological complications. The reduction of admissions suggests a more appropriate use of the ED by patients that may inspire future policies for the implementation of emergency services.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467788/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology Emergency Department Activity during Lockdown in a Teaching Hospital, Hub Center, for COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"R Amadori,&nbsp;R Buscemi,&nbsp;A Desando,&nbsp;F Grillo,&nbsp;V Remorgida,&nbsp;D Surico\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/7557628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lockdown related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has imposed profound changes in the interaction of the population with hospitals and emergency departments. The main aim of this research was to evaluate the impact of lockdown on the activity of obstetrics and gynecology emergency department (OGED) in a teaching hospital, hub center, for COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study considers all visits to the OGED with their different triage color codes that represent the clinical severity of each case (from the most severe to the least one: red, yellow, green, white). Data were selected through the \\\"PSNet\\\" triage program and collected anonymously. We analyzed frequency distributions of the variables separately for each woman and calculated mean and standard deviations for continuous variables. We then analyzed the association between factors and outcomes for categorical variables (expressed as a number and percentage of the total) using the chi-square test (<i>χ</i>2). The level of significance was established with <i>p</i> < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics V20.0. Given the fact that the study has a retrospective observational nature and it is based on an anonymous routine database, approval by the Local Ethics Committee was not necessary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The relative decrease of patients presenting to OGED in 2020 was -50.96%. The percentage of nonpregnant women was significantly lower in 2020 compared to 2019 (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001; Δ = -79.46%). Regarding the obstetric group, we saw an important decrease of visits in 2020 compared to 2019 (<i>p</i> < 0.0001; Δ = -40%). The prevalence of yellow codes was significantly higher in 2020 (Δ = +29.72%), while that of white (Δ = -61.58%) and green (Δ = -52.22%) codes was significantly lower (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001). Comparing the diagnoses at discharge, we could highlight significant reductions in 2020 for more than one diagnosis: bleeding (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001; Δ = -70.42%), pain (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001; Δ = -81.22%), urinary diseases (<i>p</i> = 0.004; Δ = -75.64%), and gastrointestinal diseases (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.0001; Δ = -87.50%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An evident change emerged in relation to the dynamics between the local obstetrical and gynecological population, and OGED resources. The COVID-19 lockdown greatly reduced the rate of admission to OGED without time-related obstetric and gynecological complications. The reduction of admissions suggests a more appropriate use of the ED by patients that may inspire future policies for the implementation of emergency services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467788/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7557628\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7557628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:与SARS-CoV-2大流行相关的封锁使民众与医院和急诊部门的互动发生了深刻变化。本研究的主要目的是评估封锁对2019冠状病毒病中心教学医院妇产科急诊科(OGED)活动的影响。方法:该研究考虑了所有访问OGED的不同分类颜色代码,代表每个病例的临床严重程度(从最严重到最轻:红色,黄色,绿色,白色)。数据通过“PSNet”分类程序筛选并匿名收集。我们分别为每位女性分析了变量的频率分布,并计算了连续变量的均值和标准差。然后,我们使用卡方检验(χ2)分析了分类变量(以数字和占总数的百分比表示)的因素与结果之间的关联。p < 0.05为显著性水平。采用SPSS Statistics V20.0进行统计学分析。鉴于该研究具有回顾性观察性质,并且基于匿名常规数据库,因此无需获得当地伦理委员会的批准。结果:2020年出现OGED的患者相对减少-50.96%。与2019年相比,2020年未怀孕妇女的比例显著降低(p≤0.0001;Δ = -79.46%)。关于产科组,与2019年相比,我们看到2020年的访问量显著减少(p < 0.0001;Δ = -40%)。2020年,黄色编码的患病率显著高于黄色编码(Δ = +29.72%),白色编码(Δ = -61.58%)和绿色编码(Δ = -52.22%)的患病率显著低于黄色编码(p≤0.0001)。比较出院时的诊断,我们可以强调2020年不止一种诊断的显著减少:出血(p≤0.0001;Δ = -70.42%),疼痛(p≤0.0001;Δ = -81.22%),泌尿系统疾病(p = 0.004;Δ = -75.64%),胃肠道疾病(p≤0.0001;Δ = -87.50%)。结论:当地妇产科人口与OGED资源之间的动态关系发生了明显变化。COVID-19封锁大大降低了OGED的入院率,没有与时间有关的产科和妇科并发症。入院人数的减少表明患者更适当地使用急诊科,这可能会启发未来实施急诊服务的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obstetrics and Gynecology Emergency Department Activity during Lockdown in a Teaching Hospital, Hub Center, for COVID-19.

Background: The lockdown related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has imposed profound changes in the interaction of the population with hospitals and emergency departments. The main aim of this research was to evaluate the impact of lockdown on the activity of obstetrics and gynecology emergency department (OGED) in a teaching hospital, hub center, for COVID-19.

Methods: The study considers all visits to the OGED with their different triage color codes that represent the clinical severity of each case (from the most severe to the least one: red, yellow, green, white). Data were selected through the "PSNet" triage program and collected anonymously. We analyzed frequency distributions of the variables separately for each woman and calculated mean and standard deviations for continuous variables. We then analyzed the association between factors and outcomes for categorical variables (expressed as a number and percentage of the total) using the chi-square test (χ2). The level of significance was established with p < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics V20.0. Given the fact that the study has a retrospective observational nature and it is based on an anonymous routine database, approval by the Local Ethics Committee was not necessary.

Results: The relative decrease of patients presenting to OGED in 2020 was -50.96%. The percentage of nonpregnant women was significantly lower in 2020 compared to 2019 (p ≤ 0.0001; Δ = -79.46%). Regarding the obstetric group, we saw an important decrease of visits in 2020 compared to 2019 (p < 0.0001; Δ = -40%). The prevalence of yellow codes was significantly higher in 2020 (Δ = +29.72%), while that of white (Δ = -61.58%) and green (Δ = -52.22%) codes was significantly lower (p ≤ 0.0001). Comparing the diagnoses at discharge, we could highlight significant reductions in 2020 for more than one diagnosis: bleeding (p ≤ 0.0001; Δ = -70.42%), pain (p ≤ 0.0001; Δ = -81.22%), urinary diseases (p = 0.004; Δ = -75.64%), and gastrointestinal diseases (p ≤ 0.0001; Δ = -87.50%).

Conclusions: An evident change emerged in relation to the dynamics between the local obstetrical and gynecological population, and OGED resources. The COVID-19 lockdown greatly reduced the rate of admission to OGED without time-related obstetric and gynecological complications. The reduction of admissions suggests a more appropriate use of the ED by patients that may inspire future policies for the implementation of emergency services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Obstetrics and Gynecology International OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Obstetrics and Gynecology International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a forum for scientists and clinical professionals working in obstetrics and gynecology. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine and infertility, reproductive endocrinology, and sexual medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信