如何在以病人为中心的纵向整合实习中促进学生的学习:学生学习经验的相关因素。

Korean journal of medical education Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-26 DOI:10.3946/kjme.2022.230
Ju Whi Kim, Hyunjin Ryu, Jun-Bean Park, Sang Hui Moon, Sun Jung Myung, Wan Beom Park, Jae-Joon Yim, Hyun Bae Yoon
{"title":"如何在以病人为中心的纵向整合实习中促进学生的学习:学生学习经验的相关因素。","authors":"Ju Whi Kim,&nbsp;Hyunjin Ryu,&nbsp;Jun-Bean Park,&nbsp;Sang Hui Moon,&nbsp;Sun Jung Myung,&nbsp;Wan Beom Park,&nbsp;Jae-Joon Yim,&nbsp;Hyun Bae Yoon","doi":"10.3946/kjme.2022.230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) have been introduced in medical schools, as learning relationships with clinical faculty or peers are important components of medical education. The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of student-faculty and student-student interactions in the LIC and to identify other factors related to whether students understood and acquired the program's main outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted among the 149 third-year students who participated in the LIC in 2019. We divided the students into groups of eight. These groups were organized into corresponding discussion classes, during which students had discussions with clinical faculty members and peers and received feedback. Clinical faculty members and students were matched through an e-portfolio, where records were approved and feedback was given. A course evaluation questionnaire was completed and analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 144 valid questionnaires were returned. Logistic regression analysis showed that relevant feedback in discussion classes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 5.071; p<0.001), frequency of e-portfolio feedback (AOR, 1.813; p=0.012), and motivation by e-portfolio feedback (AOR, 1.790; p=0.026) predicted a greater likelihood of understanding the continuity of the patient's medical experience. Relevant feedback from faculty members in discussion classes (AOR, 3.455; p<0.001) and frequency of e-portfolio feedback (AOR, 2.232; p<0.001) also predicted a greater likelihood of understanding the concept of patient-centered care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Student-faculty interactions, including relevant feedback in discusstion classes, frequency of e-portfolio feedback, and motivation by e-portfolio feedback were found to be important factors in the LIC program.</p>","PeriodicalId":37737,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of medical education","volume":"34 3","pages":"201-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/6b/kjme-2022-230.PMC9452371.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to enhance students' learning in a patient-centered longitudinal integrated clerkship: factors associated with students' learning experiences.\",\"authors\":\"Ju Whi Kim,&nbsp;Hyunjin Ryu,&nbsp;Jun-Bean Park,&nbsp;Sang Hui Moon,&nbsp;Sun Jung Myung,&nbsp;Wan Beom Park,&nbsp;Jae-Joon Yim,&nbsp;Hyun Bae Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.3946/kjme.2022.230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) have been introduced in medical schools, as learning relationships with clinical faculty or peers are important components of medical education. The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of student-faculty and student-student interactions in the LIC and to identify other factors related to whether students understood and acquired the program's main outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted among the 149 third-year students who participated in the LIC in 2019. We divided the students into groups of eight. These groups were organized into corresponding discussion classes, during which students had discussions with clinical faculty members and peers and received feedback. Clinical faculty members and students were matched through an e-portfolio, where records were approved and feedback was given. A course evaluation questionnaire was completed and analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 144 valid questionnaires were returned. Logistic regression analysis showed that relevant feedback in discussion classes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 5.071; p<0.001), frequency of e-portfolio feedback (AOR, 1.813; p=0.012), and motivation by e-portfolio feedback (AOR, 1.790; p=0.026) predicted a greater likelihood of understanding the continuity of the patient's medical experience. Relevant feedback from faculty members in discussion classes (AOR, 3.455; p<0.001) and frequency of e-portfolio feedback (AOR, 2.232; p<0.001) also predicted a greater likelihood of understanding the concept of patient-centered care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Student-faculty interactions, including relevant feedback in discusstion classes, frequency of e-portfolio feedback, and motivation by e-portfolio feedback were found to be important factors in the LIC program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean journal of medical education\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"201-212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/6b/kjme-2022-230.PMC9452371.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean journal of medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2022.230\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2022.230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:纵向整合见习(LICs)已在医学院校引入,因为与临床教师或同行的学习关系是医学教育的重要组成部分。本研究的目的是调查学生-教师和学生-学生互动的特点,并确定与学生是否理解和获得项目的主要成果有关的其他因素。方法:对2019年参加LIC的149名三年级学生进行研究。我们把学生分成八人一组。这些小组被组织成相应的讨论课,在讨论课上,学生与临床教师和同行进行讨论并获得反馈。临床教师和学生通过电子档案进行匹配,在那里记录被批准并给出反馈。完成课程评价问卷并进行分析。结果:共回收有效问卷144份。Logistic回归分析显示,讨论课相关反馈(调整优势比[AOR], 5.071;结论:师生互动,包括讨论课上的相关反馈、电子档案反馈的频率和电子档案反馈的动机是影响LIC计划的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How to enhance students' learning in a patient-centered longitudinal integrated clerkship: factors associated with students' learning experiences.

How to enhance students' learning in a patient-centered longitudinal integrated clerkship: factors associated with students' learning experiences.

How to enhance students' learning in a patient-centered longitudinal integrated clerkship: factors associated with students' learning experiences.

Purpose: Longitudinal integrated clerkships (LICs) have been introduced in medical schools, as learning relationships with clinical faculty or peers are important components of medical education. The purpose of this study was to investigate the characteristics of student-faculty and student-student interactions in the LIC and to identify other factors related to whether students understood and acquired the program's main outcomes.

Methods: The study was conducted among the 149 third-year students who participated in the LIC in 2019. We divided the students into groups of eight. These groups were organized into corresponding discussion classes, during which students had discussions with clinical faculty members and peers and received feedback. Clinical faculty members and students were matched through an e-portfolio, where records were approved and feedback was given. A course evaluation questionnaire was completed and analysed.

Results: A total of 144 valid questionnaires were returned. Logistic regression analysis showed that relevant feedback in discussion classes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 5.071; p<0.001), frequency of e-portfolio feedback (AOR, 1.813; p=0.012), and motivation by e-portfolio feedback (AOR, 1.790; p=0.026) predicted a greater likelihood of understanding the continuity of the patient's medical experience. Relevant feedback from faculty members in discussion classes (AOR, 3.455; p<0.001) and frequency of e-portfolio feedback (AOR, 2.232; p<0.001) also predicted a greater likelihood of understanding the concept of patient-centered care.

Conclusion: Student-faculty interactions, including relevant feedback in discusstion classes, frequency of e-portfolio feedback, and motivation by e-portfolio feedback were found to be important factors in the LIC program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean journal of medical education
Korean journal of medical education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal seeks to provide theoretical foundations, practical analysis, and up-to-date developments in health professional education: Curriculum development Teaching and learning Student assessment Educational evaluation Educational management and policy The journal welcomes high-quality papers on all levels of health professional education, including: Undergraduate education Postgraduate training Continuous professional development Interprofessional education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信