{"title":"社会颠覆性技术、情境完整性与道德变革的保守主义。","authors":"Ibo van de Poel","doi":"10.1007/s13347-022-00578-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This commentary is a response to <i>Contextual Integrity as a General Conceptual Tool for Evaluating Technological Change</i> by Elizabeth O'Neill (<i>Philosophy & Technology</i> (2022)). It argues that while contextual integrity (CI) might be an useful addition to the toolkit of approaches for ethical technology assessment, a CI approach might not be able to uncover all morally relevant impacts of technological change. Moreover, the inherent conservatism of a CI approach might be problematic in cases in which we encounter new kinds of morally problematic situations, such as climate change, or when technology reinforces historically grown injustices.</p>","PeriodicalId":513391,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Technology","volume":"35 3","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9424131/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socially Disruptive Technologies, Contextual Integrity, and Conservatism About Moral Change.\",\"authors\":\"Ibo van de Poel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13347-022-00578-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This commentary is a response to <i>Contextual Integrity as a General Conceptual Tool for Evaluating Technological Change</i> by Elizabeth O'Neill (<i>Philosophy & Technology</i> (2022)). It argues that while contextual integrity (CI) might be an useful addition to the toolkit of approaches for ethical technology assessment, a CI approach might not be able to uncover all morally relevant impacts of technological change. Moreover, the inherent conservatism of a CI approach might be problematic in cases in which we encounter new kinds of morally problematic situations, such as climate change, or when technology reinforces historically grown injustices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":513391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy & Technology\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9424131/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00578-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00578-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Socially Disruptive Technologies, Contextual Integrity, and Conservatism About Moral Change.
This commentary is a response to Contextual Integrity as a General Conceptual Tool for Evaluating Technological Change by Elizabeth O'Neill (Philosophy & Technology (2022)). It argues that while contextual integrity (CI) might be an useful addition to the toolkit of approaches for ethical technology assessment, a CI approach might not be able to uncover all morally relevant impacts of technological change. Moreover, the inherent conservatism of a CI approach might be problematic in cases in which we encounter new kinds of morally problematic situations, such as climate change, or when technology reinforces historically grown injustices.