社会颠覆性技术、情境完整性与道德变革的保守主义。

Philosophy & Technology Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-30 DOI:10.1007/s13347-022-00578-4
Ibo van de Poel
{"title":"社会颠覆性技术、情境完整性与道德变革的保守主义。","authors":"Ibo van de Poel","doi":"10.1007/s13347-022-00578-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This commentary is a response to <i>Contextual Integrity as a General Conceptual Tool for Evaluating Technological Change</i> by Elizabeth O'Neill (<i>Philosophy & Technology</i> (2022)). It argues that while contextual integrity (CI) might be an useful addition to the toolkit of approaches for ethical technology assessment, a CI approach might not be able to uncover all morally relevant impacts of technological change. Moreover, the inherent conservatism of a CI approach might be problematic in cases in which we encounter new kinds of morally problematic situations, such as climate change, or when technology reinforces historically grown injustices.</p>","PeriodicalId":513391,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Technology","volume":"35 3","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9424131/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socially Disruptive Technologies, Contextual Integrity, and Conservatism About Moral Change.\",\"authors\":\"Ibo van de Poel\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13347-022-00578-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This commentary is a response to <i>Contextual Integrity as a General Conceptual Tool for Evaluating Technological Change</i> by Elizabeth O'Neill (<i>Philosophy & Technology</i> (2022)). It argues that while contextual integrity (CI) might be an useful addition to the toolkit of approaches for ethical technology assessment, a CI approach might not be able to uncover all morally relevant impacts of technological change. Moreover, the inherent conservatism of a CI approach might be problematic in cases in which we encounter new kinds of morally problematic situations, such as climate change, or when technology reinforces historically grown injustices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":513391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy & Technology\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9424131/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00578-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00578-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这篇评论是对伊丽莎白·奥尼尔(Elizabeth O'Neill)的《作为评估技术变革的一般概念工具的语境完整性》(哲学与技术(2022))的回应。报告认为,虽然情境完整性(CI)可能是伦理技术评估方法工具包的有用补充,但CI方法可能无法揭示技术变革的所有道德相关影响。此外,当我们遇到新的道德问题时,比如气候变化,或者当技术加剧了历史上的不公正时,人工智能方法固有的保守性可能会出现问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socially Disruptive Technologies, Contextual Integrity, and Conservatism About Moral Change.

This commentary is a response to Contextual Integrity as a General Conceptual Tool for Evaluating Technological Change by Elizabeth O'Neill (Philosophy & Technology (2022)). It argues that while contextual integrity (CI) might be an useful addition to the toolkit of approaches for ethical technology assessment, a CI approach might not be able to uncover all morally relevant impacts of technological change. Moreover, the inherent conservatism of a CI approach might be problematic in cases in which we encounter new kinds of morally problematic situations, such as climate change, or when technology reinforces historically grown injustices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信