Yufan Yang, Yingying Huang, Ning Dong, Liping Zhang, Shuanghong Zhang
{"title":"远程医疗干预对癌症患者焦虑和抑郁的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yufan Yang, Yingying Huang, Ning Dong, Liping Zhang, Shuanghong Zhang","doi":"10.1177/1357633X221122727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cancer patients not only experience a variety of problems associated with the treatment of their disease but also a range of psychological problems such as anxiety and depression, which may lead to reduced adherence to treatment and a lower quality of life for cancer patients. Telehealth interventions are widely used for cancer patients, and their effectiveness in improving anxiety and depression in cancer patients is variable and still contradictory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL Complete, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to 19 April 2022. Data synthesis was conducted using STATA 15.0, and scores for anxiety and depression were calculated using standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13125 cancer patients from 68 randomized controlled trials were included in the systematic evaluation. The meta-analysis showed that the telehealth intervention had a significant effect on anxiety (standardized mean differences = -0.40, 95% confidence intervals: -0.6 to 0.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and depression (standardized mean differences = -0.48, 95% confidence intervals: -0.67 to 0.28, <i>p</i> < 0.001) in patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Telehealth interventions significantly improved anxiety and depression levels in cancer patients compared to traditional care interventions. Breast cancer patients most often received telehealth interventions; electronic device-based and application-based telehealth interventions were more effective than online interventions; short-term interventions were more effective than medium-term and long-term interventions, and different outcome measurement tools led to different intervention outcomes. More high-quality research is needed to explore the effects of telehealth interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of telehealth interventions on anxiety and depression in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Yufan Yang, Yingying Huang, Ning Dong, Liping Zhang, Shuanghong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1357633X221122727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cancer patients not only experience a variety of problems associated with the treatment of their disease but also a range of psychological problems such as anxiety and depression, which may lead to reduced adherence to treatment and a lower quality of life for cancer patients. Telehealth interventions are widely used for cancer patients, and their effectiveness in improving anxiety and depression in cancer patients is variable and still contradictory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL Complete, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to 19 April 2022. Data synthesis was conducted using STATA 15.0, and scores for anxiety and depression were calculated using standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13125 cancer patients from 68 randomized controlled trials were included in the systematic evaluation. The meta-analysis showed that the telehealth intervention had a significant effect on anxiety (standardized mean differences = -0.40, 95% confidence intervals: -0.6 to 0.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and depression (standardized mean differences = -0.48, 95% confidence intervals: -0.67 to 0.28, <i>p</i> < 0.001) in patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Telehealth interventions significantly improved anxiety and depression levels in cancer patients compared to traditional care interventions. Breast cancer patients most often received telehealth interventions; electronic device-based and application-based telehealth interventions were more effective than online interventions; short-term interventions were more effective than medium-term and long-term interventions, and different outcome measurement tools led to different intervention outcomes. More high-quality research is needed to explore the effects of telehealth interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X221122727\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X221122727","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:癌症患者不仅会遇到与疾病治疗相关的各种问题,还会遇到焦虑和抑郁等一系列心理问题,这可能会导致癌症患者对治疗的依从性降低和生活质量下降。远程医疗干预被广泛应用于癌症患者,但其在改善癌症患者焦虑和抑郁方面的效果却不尽相同,且仍存在矛盾:方法:检索了从开始到 2022 年 4 月 19 日的 Embase、Pubmed、Web of Science、PsycINFO、CINAHL Complete 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials。使用STATA 15.0进行数据综合,并使用标准化均值差异和95%置信区间计算焦虑和抑郁的得分:系统评价共纳入了 68 项随机对照试验中的 13125 名癌症患者。荟萃分析表明,远程保健干预对焦虑有显著效果(标准化均值差异 = -0.40,95% 置信区间:-0.6 至 0.2,p p 讨论):与传统护理干预相比,远程医疗干预能明显改善癌症患者的焦虑和抑郁水平。乳腺癌患者最常接受远程保健干预;基于电子设备和应用程序的远程保健干预比在线干预更有效;短期干预比中期和长期干预更有效,不同的结果测量工具导致不同的干预结果。需要进行更多高质量的研究来探讨远程保健干预的效果。
Effect of telehealth interventions on anxiety and depression in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Introduction: Cancer patients not only experience a variety of problems associated with the treatment of their disease but also a range of psychological problems such as anxiety and depression, which may lead to reduced adherence to treatment and a lower quality of life for cancer patients. Telehealth interventions are widely used for cancer patients, and their effectiveness in improving anxiety and depression in cancer patients is variable and still contradictory.
Methods: Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL Complete, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to 19 April 2022. Data synthesis was conducted using STATA 15.0, and scores for anxiety and depression were calculated using standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals.
Results: A total of 13125 cancer patients from 68 randomized controlled trials were included in the systematic evaluation. The meta-analysis showed that the telehealth intervention had a significant effect on anxiety (standardized mean differences = -0.40, 95% confidence intervals: -0.6 to 0.2, p < 0.001) and depression (standardized mean differences = -0.48, 95% confidence intervals: -0.67 to 0.28, p < 0.001) in patients with cancer.
Discussion: Telehealth interventions significantly improved anxiety and depression levels in cancer patients compared to traditional care interventions. Breast cancer patients most often received telehealth interventions; electronic device-based and application-based telehealth interventions were more effective than online interventions; short-term interventions were more effective than medium-term and long-term interventions, and different outcome measurement tools led to different intervention outcomes. More high-quality research is needed to explore the effects of telehealth interventions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.