动物布鲁氏菌病:埃塞俄比亚南部和中部的血清阳性率、分离和分子检测。

IF 1.7 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2022-08-27 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.2147/VMRR.S372455
Bayeta Senbata Wakjira, Edilu Jorga, Matios Lakew, Abebe Olani, Biniam Tadesse, Getachew Tuli, Redeat Belaineh, Shubisa Abera, Getachew Kinfe, Solomon Gebre
{"title":"动物布鲁氏菌病:埃塞俄比亚南部和中部的血清阳性率、分离和分子检测。","authors":"Bayeta Senbata Wakjira,&nbsp;Edilu Jorga,&nbsp;Matios Lakew,&nbsp;Abebe Olani,&nbsp;Biniam Tadesse,&nbsp;Getachew Tuli,&nbsp;Redeat Belaineh,&nbsp;Shubisa Abera,&nbsp;Getachew Kinfe,&nbsp;Solomon Gebre","doi":"10.2147/VMRR.S372455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Brucellosis is a neglected bacterial zoonosis with serious veterinary and public health importance throughout the world. A cross-sectional study on animal brucellosis was conducted aiming to estimate seroprevalence and molecular detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples were collected from a total of 4274 individual animals (cattle, small ruminants and camel) from 241 herds/flocks for serology and PCR. Serum samples were tested using multispecies I-ELISA. Blood clots from seropositive animals were also tested for brucellosis via PCR. Additionally, 13 vaginal swab samples were collected from animals (2 from bovine and 11 from small ruminants) with recent abortion history for bacterial isolation and molecular detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall individual animal and herd level seroprevalence was 3.95% (169/4274) and 18.26% (44/241) respectively. The animal level seroprevalence at species level was 1.58% (47/2982), 8.89% (97/1091) and 12.44% (25/201) in bovine, small ruminants (sheep and goat) and camel, respectively. Herd level seroprevalence were 5.43% (10/184), 52.08% (25/48) and 100% (9/9) in bovine, small ruminant and camel, respectively. The animal level seroprevalence of bovine from intensive and extensive systems was 1.10% (31/2808) and 2.87% (5/174) respectively. Blood clots tested for brucellosis via PCR were negative by RT-PCR. <i>Brucella</i> species was isolated from 6/13 (46.15%) vaginal swab samples cultured on <i>Brucella</i> selective agar, and shown to be <i>B. melitensis</i> using Real-Time PCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, seropositivity for camels was higher than what has been reported previously. Also, there was a notable difference in this study in cattle seroprevalence when comparing extensive with intensive systems, with the extensive system having much greater seropositivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":75300,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/70/da/vmrr-13-201.PMC9431773.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Animal Brucellosis: Seropositivity rates, Isolation and Molecular Detection in Southern and Central Ethiopia.\",\"authors\":\"Bayeta Senbata Wakjira,&nbsp;Edilu Jorga,&nbsp;Matios Lakew,&nbsp;Abebe Olani,&nbsp;Biniam Tadesse,&nbsp;Getachew Tuli,&nbsp;Redeat Belaineh,&nbsp;Shubisa Abera,&nbsp;Getachew Kinfe,&nbsp;Solomon Gebre\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/VMRR.S372455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Brucellosis is a neglected bacterial zoonosis with serious veterinary and public health importance throughout the world. A cross-sectional study on animal brucellosis was conducted aiming to estimate seroprevalence and molecular detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blood samples were collected from a total of 4274 individual animals (cattle, small ruminants and camel) from 241 herds/flocks for serology and PCR. Serum samples were tested using multispecies I-ELISA. Blood clots from seropositive animals were also tested for brucellosis via PCR. Additionally, 13 vaginal swab samples were collected from animals (2 from bovine and 11 from small ruminants) with recent abortion history for bacterial isolation and molecular detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall individual animal and herd level seroprevalence was 3.95% (169/4274) and 18.26% (44/241) respectively. The animal level seroprevalence at species level was 1.58% (47/2982), 8.89% (97/1091) and 12.44% (25/201) in bovine, small ruminants (sheep and goat) and camel, respectively. Herd level seroprevalence were 5.43% (10/184), 52.08% (25/48) and 100% (9/9) in bovine, small ruminant and camel, respectively. The animal level seroprevalence of bovine from intensive and extensive systems was 1.10% (31/2808) and 2.87% (5/174) respectively. Blood clots tested for brucellosis via PCR were negative by RT-PCR. <i>Brucella</i> species was isolated from 6/13 (46.15%) vaginal swab samples cultured on <i>Brucella</i> selective agar, and shown to be <i>B. melitensis</i> using Real-Time PCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, seropositivity for camels was higher than what has been reported previously. Also, there was a notable difference in this study in cattle seroprevalence when comparing extensive with intensive systems, with the extensive system having much greater seropositivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/70/da/vmrr-13-201.PMC9431773.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S372455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S372455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

布鲁氏菌病是一种被忽视的细菌性人畜共患病,在全世界具有严重的兽医和公共卫生重要性。进行了一项动物布鲁氏菌病的横断面研究,旨在估计血清阳性率和分子检测。方法:采集241个畜群(牛、小反刍动物和骆驼)共4274只动物的血液进行血清学和PCR检测。血清样品采用多种I-ELISA检测。还通过聚合酶链反应对血清阳性动物的血凝块进行了布鲁氏菌病检测。此外,还从最近流产史的动物(2只牛,11只小反刍动物)中采集了13份阴道拭子样本进行细菌分离和分子检测。结果:动物个体血清阳性率为3.95%(169/4274),兽群血清阳性率为18.26%(44/241)。动物、小反刍动物(绵羊和山羊)和骆驼的血清阳性率分别为1.58%(47/2982)、8.89%(97/1091)和12.44%(25/201)。牛、小反刍动物和骆驼的血清阳性率分别为5.43%(10/184)、52.08%(25/48)和100%(9/9)。集约化系统和粗放化系统牛血清阳性率分别为1.10%(31/2808)和2.87%(5/174)。RT-PCR检测布鲁氏菌病血凝块呈阴性。在布氏菌选择性琼脂培养基上培养的阴道拭子样品中,有6/13(46.15%)分离到布氏菌,经实时荧光定量PCR鉴定为布氏杆菌。结论:总体而言,骆驼的血清阳性比以前报道的要高。此外,在本研究中,粗放型系统与集约型系统相比,牛的血清阳性率有显著差异,粗放型系统的血清阳性率要高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Animal Brucellosis: Seropositivity rates, Isolation and Molecular Detection in Southern and Central Ethiopia.

Animal Brucellosis: Seropositivity rates, Isolation and Molecular Detection in Southern and Central Ethiopia.

Animal Brucellosis: Seropositivity rates, Isolation and Molecular Detection in Southern and Central Ethiopia.

Animal Brucellosis: Seropositivity rates, Isolation and Molecular Detection in Southern and Central Ethiopia.

Introduction: Brucellosis is a neglected bacterial zoonosis with serious veterinary and public health importance throughout the world. A cross-sectional study on animal brucellosis was conducted aiming to estimate seroprevalence and molecular detection.

Methods: Blood samples were collected from a total of 4274 individual animals (cattle, small ruminants and camel) from 241 herds/flocks for serology and PCR. Serum samples were tested using multispecies I-ELISA. Blood clots from seropositive animals were also tested for brucellosis via PCR. Additionally, 13 vaginal swab samples were collected from animals (2 from bovine and 11 from small ruminants) with recent abortion history for bacterial isolation and molecular detection.

Results: The overall individual animal and herd level seroprevalence was 3.95% (169/4274) and 18.26% (44/241) respectively. The animal level seroprevalence at species level was 1.58% (47/2982), 8.89% (97/1091) and 12.44% (25/201) in bovine, small ruminants (sheep and goat) and camel, respectively. Herd level seroprevalence were 5.43% (10/184), 52.08% (25/48) and 100% (9/9) in bovine, small ruminant and camel, respectively. The animal level seroprevalence of bovine from intensive and extensive systems was 1.10% (31/2808) and 2.87% (5/174) respectively. Blood clots tested for brucellosis via PCR were negative by RT-PCR. Brucella species was isolated from 6/13 (46.15%) vaginal swab samples cultured on Brucella selective agar, and shown to be B. melitensis using Real-Time PCR.

Conclusion: Overall, seropositivity for camels was higher than what has been reported previously. Also, there was a notable difference in this study in cattle seroprevalence when comparing extensive with intensive systems, with the extensive system having much greater seropositivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信