日本版慢性疼痛患者活动测量模式的验证。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Kiyoka Enomoto, Tomonori Adachi, Akira Mibu, Katsuyoshi Tanaka, Sei Fukui, Miho Nakanishi, Narihito Iwashita, Jun Sasaki, Tomohiko Nishigami
{"title":"日本版慢性疼痛患者活动测量模式的验证。","authors":"Kiyoka Enomoto,&nbsp;Tomonori Adachi,&nbsp;Akira Mibu,&nbsp;Katsuyoshi Tanaka,&nbsp;Sei Fukui,&nbsp;Miho Nakanishi,&nbsp;Narihito Iwashita,&nbsp;Jun Sasaki,&nbsp;Tomohiko Nishigami","doi":"10.1186/s13030-022-00248-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain (POAM-P) is a self-report questionnaire that measures avoidance, overdoing, and pacing in individuals with chronic pain. We aimed to develop and confirm the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the POAM-P(POAM-P-J) in Japanese individuals with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 147 Japanese individuals with chronic pain (106 women; mean age 64.89 ± 12.13 years). The individuals completed the POAM-P-J, the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The following psychometric properties of the POAM-P-J were confirmed: structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We tested factor structure via confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). We chose the 3-factor model with six covariances. The POAM-P-J's internal consistency and test-retest reliability were acceptable to good (α = 0.79-0.86; ICC = 0.72-0.87). The avoidance and overdoing subscales were positively associated with pain severity, pain interference, and anxiety measures (all p < 0.05), but the pacing subscale was not significantly associated with these pain-related measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the structural validity of the POAM-P-J remains questionable, its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity were confirmed. The POAM-P-J is useful in both research and clinical practice for evaluating the activity patterns of Japanese patients with chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441030/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Japanese version of the patterns of activity measure-pain in individuals with chronic pain.\",\"authors\":\"Kiyoka Enomoto,&nbsp;Tomonori Adachi,&nbsp;Akira Mibu,&nbsp;Katsuyoshi Tanaka,&nbsp;Sei Fukui,&nbsp;Miho Nakanishi,&nbsp;Narihito Iwashita,&nbsp;Jun Sasaki,&nbsp;Tomohiko Nishigami\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13030-022-00248-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain (POAM-P) is a self-report questionnaire that measures avoidance, overdoing, and pacing in individuals with chronic pain. We aimed to develop and confirm the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the POAM-P(POAM-P-J) in Japanese individuals with chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 147 Japanese individuals with chronic pain (106 women; mean age 64.89 ± 12.13 years). The individuals completed the POAM-P-J, the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The following psychometric properties of the POAM-P-J were confirmed: structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We tested factor structure via confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). We chose the 3-factor model with six covariances. The POAM-P-J's internal consistency and test-retest reliability were acceptable to good (α = 0.79-0.86; ICC = 0.72-0.87). The avoidance and overdoing subscales were positively associated with pain severity, pain interference, and anxiety measures (all p < 0.05), but the pacing subscale was not significantly associated with these pain-related measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the structural validity of the POAM-P-J remains questionable, its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity were confirmed. The POAM-P-J is useful in both research and clinical practice for evaluating the activity patterns of Japanese patients with chronic pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441030/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-022-00248-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-022-00248-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:活动测量-疼痛模式(POAM-P)是一份自我报告问卷,用于测量慢性疼痛患者的回避、过度运动和步调。我们的目的是开发和确认日本版POAM-P(POAM-P- j)在日本慢性疼痛患者中的心理测量特性。方法:我们招募了147名日本慢性疼痛患者(106名女性;平均年龄64.89±12.13岁)。这些个体完成了POAM-P-J、简短疼痛量表(BPI)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)。检验了POAM-P-J量表的结构效度、内部一致性、重测信度和并发效度。结果:通过验证性因子分析(CFA)对因子结构进行检验。我们选择具有6个协方差的3因素模型。POAM-P-J的内部一致性和重测信度可接受至良好(α = 0.79-0.86;icc = 0.72-0.87)。回避和过度行为分量表与疼痛严重程度、疼痛干扰和焦虑测量呈正相关(均为p)。结论:尽管POAM-P-J的结构效度仍有疑问,但其内部一致性、重测信度和并发效度得到了证实。POAM-P-J在研究和临床实践中对评估日本慢性疼痛患者的活动模式都很有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validation of the Japanese version of the patterns of activity measure-pain in individuals with chronic pain.

Validation of the Japanese version of the patterns of activity measure-pain in individuals with chronic pain.

Background: The Patterns of Activity Measure-Pain (POAM-P) is a self-report questionnaire that measures avoidance, overdoing, and pacing in individuals with chronic pain. We aimed to develop and confirm the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the POAM-P(POAM-P-J) in Japanese individuals with chronic pain.

Methods: We recruited 147 Japanese individuals with chronic pain (106 women; mean age 64.89 ± 12.13 years). The individuals completed the POAM-P-J, the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The following psychometric properties of the POAM-P-J were confirmed: structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity.

Results: We tested factor structure via confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). We chose the 3-factor model with six covariances. The POAM-P-J's internal consistency and test-retest reliability were acceptable to good (α = 0.79-0.86; ICC = 0.72-0.87). The avoidance and overdoing subscales were positively associated with pain severity, pain interference, and anxiety measures (all p < 0.05), but the pacing subscale was not significantly associated with these pain-related measures.

Conclusions: Although the structural validity of the POAM-P-J remains questionable, its internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and concurrent validity were confirmed. The POAM-P-J is useful in both research and clinical practice for evaluating the activity patterns of Japanese patients with chronic pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信