J Z Alex Cheong, Jessica M Irvine, Shane Roesemann, Anna Nora, Courtney E Morgan, Christopher Daniele, Lindsay R Kalan, Meghan B Brennan
{"title":"踝臂指数与厌氧菌:糖尿病足溃疡中的外周动脉疾病与厌氧菌有关吗?","authors":"J Z Alex Cheong, Jessica M Irvine, Shane Roesemann, Anna Nora, Courtney E Morgan, Christopher Daniele, Lindsay R Kalan, Meghan B Brennan","doi":"10.1177/20420188221118747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lower extremity amputations from diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are rebounding, and new biomarkers that predict wound healing are urgently needed. Anaerobic bacteria have been associated with persistent ulcers and may be a promising biomarker beyond currently recommended vascular assessments. It is unknown whether anaerobic markers are simply a downstream outcome of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and ischemia, however. Here, we evaluate associations between two measures of anaerobic bacteria-abundance and metabolic activity-and PAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We built a prospective cohort of 37 patients with baseline ankle brachial index (ABI) results. Anaerobic bacteria were measured in two ways: DNA-based total anaerobic abundance using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and resulting summed relative abundance, and RNA-based metabolic activity based on bacterial read annotation of metatranscriptomic sequencing. PAD was defined three ways: PAD diagnosis, ABI results, and a dichotomous definition of mild ischemia (<i>versus</i> normal) based on ABI values. Statistical associations between anaerobes and PAD were evaluated using univariate odds ratios (ORs) or Spearman's correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total anaerobe abundance was not significantly associated with PAD diagnosis, ABI results, or mild ischemia (OR<sub>PAD</sub> = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.023-7.23, <i>p</i> = 0.60; Spearman's correlation coefficient<sub>ABI</sub> = 0.24, <i>p</i> = 0.17; OR<sub>mild ischemia</sub> = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.005-5.86, <i>p</i> = 0.42). Anaerobic metabolic activity was not significantly associated with PAD diagnosis, ABI results, or mild ischemia (OR<sub>PAD</sub> = 1.99, 95% CI = 0.17-21.44, <i>p</i> = 0.57; Spearman's correlation coefficient<sub>ABI</sub> = 0.12, <i>p</i> = 0.52; OR<sub>mild ischemia</sub> = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.03-15.16, <i>p</i> = 0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neither anaerobic abundance nor metabolic activity was strongly associated with our three definitions of PAD. Therefore, anaerobic bacteria may offer additional prognostic value when assessing wound healing potential and should be investigated as potential molecular biomarkers for DFU outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fb/80/10.1177_20420188221118747.PMC9424883.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ankle brachial indices and anaerobes: is peripheral arterial disease associated with anaerobic bacteria in diabetic foot ulcers?\",\"authors\":\"J Z Alex Cheong, Jessica M Irvine, Shane Roesemann, Anna Nora, Courtney E Morgan, Christopher Daniele, Lindsay R Kalan, Meghan B Brennan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20420188221118747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lower extremity amputations from diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are rebounding, and new biomarkers that predict wound healing are urgently needed. Anaerobic bacteria have been associated with persistent ulcers and may be a promising biomarker beyond currently recommended vascular assessments. It is unknown whether anaerobic markers are simply a downstream outcome of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and ischemia, however. Here, we evaluate associations between two measures of anaerobic bacteria-abundance and metabolic activity-and PAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We built a prospective cohort of 37 patients with baseline ankle brachial index (ABI) results. Anaerobic bacteria were measured in two ways: DNA-based total anaerobic abundance using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and resulting summed relative abundance, and RNA-based metabolic activity based on bacterial read annotation of metatranscriptomic sequencing. PAD was defined three ways: PAD diagnosis, ABI results, and a dichotomous definition of mild ischemia (<i>versus</i> normal) based on ABI values. Statistical associations between anaerobes and PAD were evaluated using univariate odds ratios (ORs) or Spearman's correlations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Total anaerobe abundance was not significantly associated with PAD diagnosis, ABI results, or mild ischemia (OR<sub>PAD</sub> = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.023-7.23, <i>p</i> = 0.60; Spearman's correlation coefficient<sub>ABI</sub> = 0.24, <i>p</i> = 0.17; OR<sub>mild ischemia</sub> = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.005-5.86, <i>p</i> = 0.42). Anaerobic metabolic activity was not significantly associated with PAD diagnosis, ABI results, or mild ischemia (OR<sub>PAD</sub> = 1.99, 95% CI = 0.17-21.44, <i>p</i> = 0.57; Spearman's correlation coefficient<sub>ABI</sub> = 0.12, <i>p</i> = 0.52; OR<sub>mild ischemia</sub> = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.03-15.16, <i>p</i> = 0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Neither anaerobic abundance nor metabolic activity was strongly associated with our three definitions of PAD. Therefore, anaerobic bacteria may offer additional prognostic value when assessing wound healing potential and should be investigated as potential molecular biomarkers for DFU outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fb/80/10.1177_20420188221118747.PMC9424883.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420188221118747\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420188221118747","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs)导致的下肢截肢正在反弹,因此急需能预测伤口愈合的新生物标志物。厌氧菌与顽固性溃疡有关,可能是目前推荐的血管评估之外的一种有前途的生物标志物。然而,厌氧菌标记物是否只是外周动脉疾病(PAD)和缺血的下游结果还不得而知。在此,我们评估了厌氧菌的两种测量指标--数量和代谢活性--与 PAD 之间的关联:方法:我们建立了一个前瞻性队列,包含 37 名有基线踝肱指数(ABI)结果的患者。厌氧菌的测量有两种方法:使用 16S rRNA 基因扩增子测序和由此得出的相对丰度总和,以 DNA 为基础测量厌氧菌的总丰度;使用元转录组测序的细菌读数注释,以 RNA 为基础测量代谢活性。PAD 有三种定义方式:PAD诊断、ABI结果和基于ABI值的轻度缺血(与正常)二分法定义。厌氧菌与PAD之间的统计学关联采用单变量几率比(ORs)或斯皮尔曼相关性进行评估:结果:厌氧菌总数与 PAD 诊断、ABI 结果或轻度缺血无明显关联(ORPAD = 0.47,95% CI = 0.023-7.23,p = 0.60;Spearman 相关系数ABI = 0.24,p = 0.17;ORmild ischemia = 0.25,95% CI = 0.005-5.86,p = 0.42)。无氧代谢活动与PAD诊断、ABI结果或轻度缺血无明显相关性(ORPAD = 1.99,95% CI = 0.17-21.44,p = 0.57;Spearman相关系数ABI = 0.12,p = 0.52;ORmild ischemia = 0.90,95% CI = 0.03-15.16,p = 0.94):结论:厌氧细菌的丰度和代谢活性均与 PAD 的三种定义无关。因此,厌氧菌可能会在评估伤口愈合潜力时提供额外的预后价值,并应作为 DFU 结果的潜在分子生物标记物进行研究。
Ankle brachial indices and anaerobes: is peripheral arterial disease associated with anaerobic bacteria in diabetic foot ulcers?
Background: Lower extremity amputations from diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are rebounding, and new biomarkers that predict wound healing are urgently needed. Anaerobic bacteria have been associated with persistent ulcers and may be a promising biomarker beyond currently recommended vascular assessments. It is unknown whether anaerobic markers are simply a downstream outcome of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and ischemia, however. Here, we evaluate associations between two measures of anaerobic bacteria-abundance and metabolic activity-and PAD.
Methods: We built a prospective cohort of 37 patients with baseline ankle brachial index (ABI) results. Anaerobic bacteria were measured in two ways: DNA-based total anaerobic abundance using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and resulting summed relative abundance, and RNA-based metabolic activity based on bacterial read annotation of metatranscriptomic sequencing. PAD was defined three ways: PAD diagnosis, ABI results, and a dichotomous definition of mild ischemia (versus normal) based on ABI values. Statistical associations between anaerobes and PAD were evaluated using univariate odds ratios (ORs) or Spearman's correlations.
Results: Total anaerobe abundance was not significantly associated with PAD diagnosis, ABI results, or mild ischemia (ORPAD = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.023-7.23, p = 0.60; Spearman's correlation coefficientABI = 0.24, p = 0.17; ORmild ischemia = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.005-5.86, p = 0.42). Anaerobic metabolic activity was not significantly associated with PAD diagnosis, ABI results, or mild ischemia (ORPAD = 1.99, 95% CI = 0.17-21.44, p = 0.57; Spearman's correlation coefficientABI = 0.12, p = 0.52; ORmild ischemia = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.03-15.16, p = 0.94).
Conclusion: Neither anaerobic abundance nor metabolic activity was strongly associated with our three definitions of PAD. Therefore, anaerobic bacteria may offer additional prognostic value when assessing wound healing potential and should be investigated as potential molecular biomarkers for DFU outcomes.