Andrew H Wu, Harshika Chowdhary, Matthew Fischer, Ali Salehi, Tristan Grogan, Louis Saddic, Jacques Neelankavil, Reed Harvey
{"title":"定量超声心动图改善左心室收缩功能的住院医师评估。","authors":"Andrew H Wu, Harshika Chowdhary, Matthew Fischer, Ali Salehi, Tristan Grogan, Louis Saddic, Jacques Neelankavil, Reed Harvey","doi":"10.46374/volxxiv_issue2_harvey","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of echocardiography to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an important component of anesthesiology resident education; however, there is no consensus on the most effective method for teaching this skill set. This study investigates the impact and feasibility of teaching a quantitative LVEF assessment method to anesthesiology residents, compared with teaching visual estimation techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included all anesthesiology residents rotating through cardiac anesthesia at our institution from August 2020 through March 2021. Participants completed a pretest to assess baseline ability to accurately estimate LVEF. All tests consisted of transthoracic echocardiography images with standard views from 10 patients. Participants were assigned to either a control group that received teaching on visual estimation of LVEF or an intervention group that was taught quantitative LVEF assessment with the Simpson biplane method of discs. After 4 weeks, all participants were administered a postteaching exam. A retention exam was administered an additional 4 weeks later. LVEF accuracy was measured as the absolute difference between their LVEF estimation and the reference value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Control and intervention groups performed similarly on the preteaching exam of LVEF estimation accuracy. Intervention-group residents demonstrated significantly improved accuracy in LVEF assessment on the postteaching exam (3.6% improvement in accuracy, confidence interval [CI], 1.23-5.97; <i>P</i> = .03) compared with the control group (0.60% improvement inaccuracy, CI, -1.77-2.97; <i>P</i> = .62). The observed improvement was not maintained through the retention exam.<b>Conclusions:</b> Addition of quantitative LVEF assessment to traditional teaching of visual LVEF estimation methods significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of anesthesiology residents' left ventricular systolic function assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"24 2","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426259/pdf/i2333-0406-24-2-Harvey.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Echocardiography Improves Resident Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Function.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew H Wu, Harshika Chowdhary, Matthew Fischer, Ali Salehi, Tristan Grogan, Louis Saddic, Jacques Neelankavil, Reed Harvey\",\"doi\":\"10.46374/volxxiv_issue2_harvey\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of echocardiography to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an important component of anesthesiology resident education; however, there is no consensus on the most effective method for teaching this skill set. This study investigates the impact and feasibility of teaching a quantitative LVEF assessment method to anesthesiology residents, compared with teaching visual estimation techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included all anesthesiology residents rotating through cardiac anesthesia at our institution from August 2020 through March 2021. Participants completed a pretest to assess baseline ability to accurately estimate LVEF. All tests consisted of transthoracic echocardiography images with standard views from 10 patients. Participants were assigned to either a control group that received teaching on visual estimation of LVEF or an intervention group that was taught quantitative LVEF assessment with the Simpson biplane method of discs. After 4 weeks, all participants were administered a postteaching exam. A retention exam was administered an additional 4 weeks later. LVEF accuracy was measured as the absolute difference between their LVEF estimation and the reference value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Control and intervention groups performed similarly on the preteaching exam of LVEF estimation accuracy. Intervention-group residents demonstrated significantly improved accuracy in LVEF assessment on the postteaching exam (3.6% improvement in accuracy, confidence interval [CI], 1.23-5.97; <i>P</i> = .03) compared with the control group (0.60% improvement inaccuracy, CI, -1.77-2.97; <i>P</i> = .62). The observed improvement was not maintained through the retention exam.<b>Conclusions:</b> Addition of quantitative LVEF assessment to traditional teaching of visual LVEF estimation methods significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of anesthesiology residents' left ventricular systolic function assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426259/pdf/i2333-0406-24-2-Harvey.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxiv_issue2_harvey\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxiv_issue2_harvey","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quantitative Echocardiography Improves Resident Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Function.
Background: The use of echocardiography to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an important component of anesthesiology resident education; however, there is no consensus on the most effective method for teaching this skill set. This study investigates the impact and feasibility of teaching a quantitative LVEF assessment method to anesthesiology residents, compared with teaching visual estimation techniques.
Methods: We included all anesthesiology residents rotating through cardiac anesthesia at our institution from August 2020 through March 2021. Participants completed a pretest to assess baseline ability to accurately estimate LVEF. All tests consisted of transthoracic echocardiography images with standard views from 10 patients. Participants were assigned to either a control group that received teaching on visual estimation of LVEF or an intervention group that was taught quantitative LVEF assessment with the Simpson biplane method of discs. After 4 weeks, all participants were administered a postteaching exam. A retention exam was administered an additional 4 weeks later. LVEF accuracy was measured as the absolute difference between their LVEF estimation and the reference value.
Results: Control and intervention groups performed similarly on the preteaching exam of LVEF estimation accuracy. Intervention-group residents demonstrated significantly improved accuracy in LVEF assessment on the postteaching exam (3.6% improvement in accuracy, confidence interval [CI], 1.23-5.97; P = .03) compared with the control group (0.60% improvement inaccuracy, CI, -1.77-2.97; P = .62). The observed improvement was not maintained through the retention exam.Conclusions: Addition of quantitative LVEF assessment to traditional teaching of visual LVEF estimation methods significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of anesthesiology residents' left ventricular systolic function assessment.