定量超声心动图改善左心室收缩功能的住院医师评估。

Andrew H Wu, Harshika Chowdhary, Matthew Fischer, Ali Salehi, Tristan Grogan, Louis Saddic, Jacques Neelankavil, Reed Harvey
{"title":"定量超声心动图改善左心室收缩功能的住院医师评估。","authors":"Andrew H Wu,&nbsp;Harshika Chowdhary,&nbsp;Matthew Fischer,&nbsp;Ali Salehi,&nbsp;Tristan Grogan,&nbsp;Louis Saddic,&nbsp;Jacques Neelankavil,&nbsp;Reed Harvey","doi":"10.46374/volxxiv_issue2_harvey","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of echocardiography to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an important component of anesthesiology resident education; however, there is no consensus on the most effective method for teaching this skill set. This study investigates the impact and feasibility of teaching a quantitative LVEF assessment method to anesthesiology residents, compared with teaching visual estimation techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included all anesthesiology residents rotating through cardiac anesthesia at our institution from August 2020 through March 2021. Participants completed a pretest to assess baseline ability to accurately estimate LVEF. All tests consisted of transthoracic echocardiography images with standard views from 10 patients. Participants were assigned to either a control group that received teaching on visual estimation of LVEF or an intervention group that was taught quantitative LVEF assessment with the Simpson biplane method of discs. After 4 weeks, all participants were administered a postteaching exam. A retention exam was administered an additional 4 weeks later. LVEF accuracy was measured as the absolute difference between their LVEF estimation and the reference value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Control and intervention groups performed similarly on the preteaching exam of LVEF estimation accuracy. Intervention-group residents demonstrated significantly improved accuracy in LVEF assessment on the postteaching exam (3.6% improvement in accuracy, confidence interval [CI], 1.23-5.97; <i>P</i> = .03) compared with the control group (0.60% improvement inaccuracy, CI, -1.77-2.97; <i>P</i> = .62). The observed improvement was not maintained through the retention exam.<b>Conclusions:</b> Addition of quantitative LVEF assessment to traditional teaching of visual LVEF estimation methods significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of anesthesiology residents' left ventricular systolic function assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"24 2","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426259/pdf/i2333-0406-24-2-Harvey.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Echocardiography Improves Resident Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Function.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew H Wu,&nbsp;Harshika Chowdhary,&nbsp;Matthew Fischer,&nbsp;Ali Salehi,&nbsp;Tristan Grogan,&nbsp;Louis Saddic,&nbsp;Jacques Neelankavil,&nbsp;Reed Harvey\",\"doi\":\"10.46374/volxxiv_issue2_harvey\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of echocardiography to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an important component of anesthesiology resident education; however, there is no consensus on the most effective method for teaching this skill set. This study investigates the impact and feasibility of teaching a quantitative LVEF assessment method to anesthesiology residents, compared with teaching visual estimation techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included all anesthesiology residents rotating through cardiac anesthesia at our institution from August 2020 through March 2021. Participants completed a pretest to assess baseline ability to accurately estimate LVEF. All tests consisted of transthoracic echocardiography images with standard views from 10 patients. Participants were assigned to either a control group that received teaching on visual estimation of LVEF or an intervention group that was taught quantitative LVEF assessment with the Simpson biplane method of discs. After 4 weeks, all participants were administered a postteaching exam. A retention exam was administered an additional 4 weeks later. LVEF accuracy was measured as the absolute difference between their LVEF estimation and the reference value.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Control and intervention groups performed similarly on the preteaching exam of LVEF estimation accuracy. Intervention-group residents demonstrated significantly improved accuracy in LVEF assessment on the postteaching exam (3.6% improvement in accuracy, confidence interval [CI], 1.23-5.97; <i>P</i> = .03) compared with the control group (0.60% improvement inaccuracy, CI, -1.77-2.97; <i>P</i> = .62). The observed improvement was not maintained through the retention exam.<b>Conclusions:</b> Addition of quantitative LVEF assessment to traditional teaching of visual LVEF estimation methods significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of anesthesiology residents' left ventricular systolic function assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9426259/pdf/i2333-0406-24-2-Harvey.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxiv_issue2_harvey\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxiv_issue2_harvey","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超声心动图评估左室射血分数(LVEF)是麻醉学住院医师教育的重要组成部分;然而,对于教授这一技能的最有效方法尚无共识。本研究探讨了LVEF定量评估方法在麻醉科住院医师教学中的影响和可行性,并与视觉评估方法进行了比较。方法:我们纳入了2020年8月至2021年3月在我们机构轮转心脏麻醉的所有麻醉科住院医师。参与者完成了一项预测试,以评估准确估计LVEF的基线能力。所有测试包括10例患者的经胸超声心动图图像和标准视图。参与者被分配到对照组,接受LVEF视觉估计的教学,或干预组,接受辛普森双翼盘法定量评估LVEF的教学。4周后,所有参与者进行教学后考试。4周后再进行记忆力测试。LVEF精度以其LVEF估计值与参考值的绝对差值来衡量。结果:对照组和干预组在教学前LVEF估计准确性测试中表现相似。干预组住院医师在教学后考试中LVEF评估的准确性显著提高(准确性提高3.6%,置信区间[CI], 1.23-5.97;P = .03)与对照组相比(不准确性提高0.60%,CI, -1.77-2.97;P = .62)。观察到的改善并没有通过保留考试得到维持。结论:在传统LVEF视觉估计方法教学中加入定量LVEF评估,显著提高了麻醉科住院医师左室收缩功能评估的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative Echocardiography Improves Resident Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Function.

Background: The use of echocardiography to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is an important component of anesthesiology resident education; however, there is no consensus on the most effective method for teaching this skill set. This study investigates the impact and feasibility of teaching a quantitative LVEF assessment method to anesthesiology residents, compared with teaching visual estimation techniques.

Methods: We included all anesthesiology residents rotating through cardiac anesthesia at our institution from August 2020 through March 2021. Participants completed a pretest to assess baseline ability to accurately estimate LVEF. All tests consisted of transthoracic echocardiography images with standard views from 10 patients. Participants were assigned to either a control group that received teaching on visual estimation of LVEF or an intervention group that was taught quantitative LVEF assessment with the Simpson biplane method of discs. After 4 weeks, all participants were administered a postteaching exam. A retention exam was administered an additional 4 weeks later. LVEF accuracy was measured as the absolute difference between their LVEF estimation and the reference value.

Results: Control and intervention groups performed similarly on the preteaching exam of LVEF estimation accuracy. Intervention-group residents demonstrated significantly improved accuracy in LVEF assessment on the postteaching exam (3.6% improvement in accuracy, confidence interval [CI], 1.23-5.97; P = .03) compared with the control group (0.60% improvement inaccuracy, CI, -1.77-2.97; P = .62). The observed improvement was not maintained through the retention exam.Conclusions: Addition of quantitative LVEF assessment to traditional teaching of visual LVEF estimation methods significantly improved the diagnostic accuracy of anesthesiology residents' left ventricular systolic function assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信