开发多种基于虚拟现实的色彩轨迹测试简表。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-19 DOI:10.1080/23279095.2022.2130067
Noam Galor, Meytal Wilf, Meir Plotnik
{"title":"开发多种基于虚拟现实的色彩轨迹测试简表。","authors":"Noam Galor, Meytal Wilf, Meir Plotnik","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2022.2130067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Color Trails Test (CTT) is a pencil-and-paper (P&P) neuropsychological test. The CTT is divided into two parts that assess sustained visual attention (Trails A) and divided attention (Trails B). The CTT can also be performed in a virtual reality setting (VR-CTT) introducing a wider spatial range of targets. In cases of multiple assessments, repeating the same CTT configuration can bias the results due to fatigue and learning effects. The aim of this study is to create five different short versions of the VR-CTT. The different forms were created by rotating or flipping the original targets spatial layout on one of the axes and by ending it at ball #13. Healthy young participants (<i>N</i> = 15) performed the shortened VR-CTT forms (in a counterbalanced order), the P&P CTT and the original VR-CTT. We found no difference between the completion times of the five forms (<i>p</i> > 0.2), and a significant difference between Trails A and B across all forms (<i>p</i> < 0.04). Additionally, there was no evidence of a learning effect between trials (<i>p</i> > 0.4). Moreover, the shortened VR-CTT forms showed correlations with the P&P CTT (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and with the original VR-CTT (<i>p</i> < 0.06). These findings suggest that all five forms have an equal level of difficulty and that the different forms managed to mitigate the learning effects reported for repeated testing of the same spatial layout. This opens the possibility of applying the shortened VR-CTT forms for research settings and sets the basis for developing it into a clinical diagnostics tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing multiple shortened forms of virtual reality-based color trails test.\",\"authors\":\"Noam Galor, Meytal Wilf, Meir Plotnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2022.2130067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Color Trails Test (CTT) is a pencil-and-paper (P&P) neuropsychological test. The CTT is divided into two parts that assess sustained visual attention (Trails A) and divided attention (Trails B). The CTT can also be performed in a virtual reality setting (VR-CTT) introducing a wider spatial range of targets. In cases of multiple assessments, repeating the same CTT configuration can bias the results due to fatigue and learning effects. The aim of this study is to create five different short versions of the VR-CTT. The different forms were created by rotating or flipping the original targets spatial layout on one of the axes and by ending it at ball #13. Healthy young participants (<i>N</i> = 15) performed the shortened VR-CTT forms (in a counterbalanced order), the P&P CTT and the original VR-CTT. We found no difference between the completion times of the five forms (<i>p</i> > 0.2), and a significant difference between Trails A and B across all forms (<i>p</i> < 0.04). Additionally, there was no evidence of a learning effect between trials (<i>p</i> > 0.4). Moreover, the shortened VR-CTT forms showed correlations with the P&P CTT (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and with the original VR-CTT (<i>p</i> < 0.06). These findings suggest that all five forms have an equal level of difficulty and that the different forms managed to mitigate the learning effects reported for repeated testing of the same spatial layout. This opens the possibility of applying the shortened VR-CTT forms for research settings and sets the basis for developing it into a clinical diagnostics tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2130067\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2130067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

色彩轨迹测验(CTT)是一种纸笔神经心理测验。CTT 分为两部分,分别评估持续视觉注意力(轨迹 A)和分散注意力(轨迹 B)。CTT 还可以在虚拟现实环境中进行(VR-CTT),引入更多空间范围的目标。在多次评估的情况下,重复相同的 CTT 配置可能会因疲劳和学习效应而导致结果偏差。本研究的目的是创建五种不同的 VR-CTT 简版。通过旋转或翻转原始目标的空间布局轴之一,并以 13 号球为终点,创建了不同的形式。健康的年轻参与者(15 人)分别完成了缩短版 VR-CTT(平衡顺序)、P&P CTT 和原始 VR-CTT。我们发现这五种形式的完成时间没有差异(P > 0.2),而在所有形式中,路径 A 和路径 B 的完成时间有显著差异(P > 0.4)。此外,缩短后的 VR-CTT 表单与 P&P CTT 显示出相关性(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing multiple shortened forms of virtual reality-based color trails test.

The Color Trails Test (CTT) is a pencil-and-paper (P&P) neuropsychological test. The CTT is divided into two parts that assess sustained visual attention (Trails A) and divided attention (Trails B). The CTT can also be performed in a virtual reality setting (VR-CTT) introducing a wider spatial range of targets. In cases of multiple assessments, repeating the same CTT configuration can bias the results due to fatigue and learning effects. The aim of this study is to create five different short versions of the VR-CTT. The different forms were created by rotating or flipping the original targets spatial layout on one of the axes and by ending it at ball #13. Healthy young participants (N = 15) performed the shortened VR-CTT forms (in a counterbalanced order), the P&P CTT and the original VR-CTT. We found no difference between the completion times of the five forms (p > 0.2), and a significant difference between Trails A and B across all forms (p < 0.04). Additionally, there was no evidence of a learning effect between trials (p > 0.4). Moreover, the shortened VR-CTT forms showed correlations with the P&P CTT (p < 0.05) and with the original VR-CTT (p < 0.06). These findings suggest that all five forms have an equal level of difficulty and that the different forms managed to mitigate the learning effects reported for repeated testing of the same spatial layout. This opens the possibility of applying the shortened VR-CTT forms for research settings and sets the basis for developing it into a clinical diagnostics tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信