原发性或人工主动脉瓣心内膜炎患者的侵入性冠状动脉造影。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-18 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1757600
Tim Berger, Dominik Dees, Matthias Siepe, Clarence Pingpoh, Albi Fagu, Wolfgang Zeh, Friedhelm Beyersdorf, Franz-Josef Neumann, Martin Czerny, Maximilian Kreibich
{"title":"原发性或人工主动脉瓣心内膜炎患者的侵入性冠状动脉造影。","authors":"Tim Berger, Dominik Dees, Matthias Siepe, Clarence Pingpoh, Albi Fagu, Wolfgang Zeh, Friedhelm Beyersdorf, Franz-Josef Neumann, Martin Czerny, Maximilian Kreibich","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1757600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is essential to detect significant coronary artery disease (CAD) but is generally not recommended in patients with infective aortic valve endocarditis. This study aimed to evaluate the risks and benefits of preoperative ICA in patients before aortic valve replacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Between March 2008 and September 2020, 232 patients were surgically treated for infectious endocarditis of the aortic valve. Sixty-seven (29%) of them underwent preoperative diagnostic ICA and were compared with the patients without preoperative ICA. We collected their baseline characteristics, including the neurological status, previous cardiac surgical procedures, and reviewed the preoperative echocardiograms and the ICA data. The intraoperative data and clinical outcomes after ICA and after surgery were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> ICA revealed a CAD in the majority of our patients (<i>n</i> = 36; 54%): One-vessel disease <i>n</i> = 19 (28%), two-vessel disease <i>n</i> = 6 (9%), and three-vessel disease <i>n</i> = 11 (16%). We observed no adverse events following preoperative diagnostic ICA, particularly no thromboembolic complications, including stroke, visceral, or lower body ischemia were detected. During surgical aortic valve replacement, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 20 patients (30%). In patients with preoperative ICA, postoperative in-hospital mortality was significantly lower (<i>n</i> = 8 [12%] vs. <i>n</i> = 30 [18%]; <i>p</i> < 0.001), while the incidence of postoperative bleeding was higher (<i>n</i> = 18 [27%] vs. <i>n</i> = 22 [13%]; <i>p</i> = 0.022). The new-onset stroke incidence was 5% in each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Taking a multidisciplinary team approach, ICA is safe in selected patients with aortic valve infectious endocarditis with no adverse clinical outcomes, but significant clinical implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"579-586"},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients with Native or Prosthetic Aortic Valve Endocarditis.\",\"authors\":\"Tim Berger, Dominik Dees, Matthias Siepe, Clarence Pingpoh, Albi Fagu, Wolfgang Zeh, Friedhelm Beyersdorf, Franz-Josef Neumann, Martin Czerny, Maximilian Kreibich\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1757600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is essential to detect significant coronary artery disease (CAD) but is generally not recommended in patients with infective aortic valve endocarditis. This study aimed to evaluate the risks and benefits of preoperative ICA in patients before aortic valve replacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Between March 2008 and September 2020, 232 patients were surgically treated for infectious endocarditis of the aortic valve. Sixty-seven (29%) of them underwent preoperative diagnostic ICA and were compared with the patients without preoperative ICA. We collected their baseline characteristics, including the neurological status, previous cardiac surgical procedures, and reviewed the preoperative echocardiograms and the ICA data. The intraoperative data and clinical outcomes after ICA and after surgery were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> ICA revealed a CAD in the majority of our patients (<i>n</i> = 36; 54%): One-vessel disease <i>n</i> = 19 (28%), two-vessel disease <i>n</i> = 6 (9%), and three-vessel disease <i>n</i> = 11 (16%). We observed no adverse events following preoperative diagnostic ICA, particularly no thromboembolic complications, including stroke, visceral, or lower body ischemia were detected. During surgical aortic valve replacement, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 20 patients (30%). In patients with preoperative ICA, postoperative in-hospital mortality was significantly lower (<i>n</i> = 8 [12%] vs. <i>n</i> = 30 [18%]; <i>p</i> < 0.001), while the incidence of postoperative bleeding was higher (<i>n</i> = 18 [27%] vs. <i>n</i> = 22 [13%]; <i>p</i> = 0.022). The new-onset stroke incidence was 5% in each group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Taking a multidisciplinary team approach, ICA is safe in selected patients with aortic valve infectious endocarditis with no adverse clinical outcomes, but significant clinical implications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"579-586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757600\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757600","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)是检测严重冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的必要手段,但一般不建议感染性主动脉瓣心内膜炎患者进行ICA检查。本研究旨在评估主动脉瓣置换术前患者术前冠状动脉造影的风险和益处:2008年3月至2020年9月期间,232名主动脉瓣感染性心内膜炎患者接受了手术治疗。其中 67 人(29%)接受了术前诊断性 ICA,并与未接受术前 ICA 的患者进行了比较。我们收集了他们的基线特征,包括神经系统状况、既往心脏外科手术情况,并查看了术前超声心动图和 ICA 数据。对术中数据和 ICA 术后临床结果进行了评估:结果:大多数患者(36 例,54%)的 ICA 显示存在 CAD:单血管疾病 19 例(28%),双血管疾病 6 例(9%),三血管疾病 11 例(16%)。我们没有观察到术前诊断性主动脉瓣置换术后的不良事件,尤其是没有发现血栓栓塞并发症,包括中风、内脏或下半身缺血。在主动脉瓣置换手术中,有 20 名患者(30%)同时进行了冠状动脉旁路移植术。在术前接受了冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者中,术后院内死亡率明显降低(n = 8 [12%] vs. n = 30 [18%];p n = 18 [27%] vs. n = 22 [13%];p = 0.022)。两组的新发中风发生率均为 5%:结论:采取多学科团队合作的方法,对选定的主动脉瓣感染性心内膜炎患者进行 ICA 是安全的,不会出现不良临床结果,但临床意义重大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients with Native or Prosthetic Aortic Valve Endocarditis.

Background:  Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is essential to detect significant coronary artery disease (CAD) but is generally not recommended in patients with infective aortic valve endocarditis. This study aimed to evaluate the risks and benefits of preoperative ICA in patients before aortic valve replacement.

Methods:  Between March 2008 and September 2020, 232 patients were surgically treated for infectious endocarditis of the aortic valve. Sixty-seven (29%) of them underwent preoperative diagnostic ICA and were compared with the patients without preoperative ICA. We collected their baseline characteristics, including the neurological status, previous cardiac surgical procedures, and reviewed the preoperative echocardiograms and the ICA data. The intraoperative data and clinical outcomes after ICA and after surgery were evaluated.

Results:  ICA revealed a CAD in the majority of our patients (n = 36; 54%): One-vessel disease n = 19 (28%), two-vessel disease n = 6 (9%), and three-vessel disease n = 11 (16%). We observed no adverse events following preoperative diagnostic ICA, particularly no thromboembolic complications, including stroke, visceral, or lower body ischemia were detected. During surgical aortic valve replacement, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 20 patients (30%). In patients with preoperative ICA, postoperative in-hospital mortality was significantly lower (n = 8 [12%] vs. n = 30 [18%]; p < 0.001), while the incidence of postoperative bleeding was higher (n = 18 [27%] vs. n = 22 [13%]; p = 0.022). The new-onset stroke incidence was 5% in each group.

Conclusion:  Taking a multidisciplinary team approach, ICA is safe in selected patients with aortic valve infectious endocarditis with no adverse clinical outcomes, but significant clinical implications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信