COVID-19大流行期间急性胆囊炎的管理-系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 0.7
Iraj Shahramian, Fateme Parooie, Morteza Salarzaei
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间急性胆囊炎的管理-系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Iraj Shahramian,&nbsp;Fateme Parooie,&nbsp;Morteza Salarzaei","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.7099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of acute cholecystitis (AC) and review its possible management options during the COVID-19 pandemic.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; The present systematic review and meta-analysis was done in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. In August 2021, two independent reviewers reviewed a number of articles with the aim of finding studies on the management of acute cholecystitis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Articles were searched in the Cochrane, Embassies, and Medline libraries. Using the Stata statistical software 14, the estimated pooled rates were calculated. Funnel plot and I2 indices were applied for evaluating the heterogeneity between the studies.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; An overall of 8 studies consisting of 654 patients suspected for AC were included. The prevalence of COVID-19 among our included patients was 82% (95% CI: 79-84%, I2: 99.2%). Regarding the type of management, 35% (95% CI: 26-45%, I2: 46.9%) of patients undergone cholecystectomy, 47% (95% CI: 43-51%, I2: 54.4%) were managed by non-surgical methods, and 19% (95% CI: 14-23%, I2: 68.1%) of patients were treated by percutaneous cholecystostomy. The prevalence of grade 2 and 3 among our patients was 44 and 15%, respectively.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; Considering the fact that due to the current pandemic, the number of patients referring with higher grades is assumed to be increased, early cholecystectomy remains the best management option for AC patients. However, LC seems not to be the most favorable option since it is associated with a relatively higher risk of contamination with COVID-19. PC can also be considered as a temporary and safe method in high-risk patients which might enable us to protect both patients and healthcare providers.&lt;/br&gt.</p>","PeriodicalId":501107,"journal":{"name":"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny","volume":" ","pages":"6-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute Cholecystitis Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Iraj Shahramian,&nbsp;Fateme Parooie,&nbsp;Morteza Salarzaei\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0015.7099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of acute cholecystitis (AC) and review its possible management options during the COVID-19 pandemic.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Methods:&lt;/b&gt; The present systematic review and meta-analysis was done in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. In August 2021, two independent reviewers reviewed a number of articles with the aim of finding studies on the management of acute cholecystitis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Articles were searched in the Cochrane, Embassies, and Medline libraries. Using the Stata statistical software 14, the estimated pooled rates were calculated. Funnel plot and I2 indices were applied for evaluating the heterogeneity between the studies.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; An overall of 8 studies consisting of 654 patients suspected for AC were included. The prevalence of COVID-19 among our included patients was 82% (95% CI: 79-84%, I2: 99.2%). Regarding the type of management, 35% (95% CI: 26-45%, I2: 46.9%) of patients undergone cholecystectomy, 47% (95% CI: 43-51%, I2: 54.4%) were managed by non-surgical methods, and 19% (95% CI: 14-23%, I2: 68.1%) of patients were treated by percutaneous cholecystostomy. The prevalence of grade 2 and 3 among our patients was 44 and 15%, respectively.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Conclusions:&lt;/b&gt; Considering the fact that due to the current pandemic, the number of patients referring with higher grades is assumed to be increased, early cholecystectomy remains the best management option for AC patients. However, LC seems not to be the most favorable option since it is associated with a relatively higher risk of contamination with COVID-19. PC can also be considered as a temporary and safe method in high-risk patients which might enable us to protect both patients and healthcare providers.&lt;/br&gt.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"6-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.7099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.7099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

& lt; br> & lt; b>目的:& lt; / b>本研究的目的是评估COVID-19大流行期间急性胆囊炎(AC)的患病率,并审查其可能的管理方案。& lt; br> & lt; b>方法:& lt; / b>本系统评价和荟萃分析是按照PRISMA指南进行的。2021年8月,两名独立审稿人审查了一些文章,目的是找到关于COVID-19大流行期间急性胆囊炎管理的研究。文章在Cochrane、embassy和Medline图书馆进行了检索。使用Stata统计软件14,计算估计的合并率。采用漏斗图和I2指数评价研究间的异质性。</br>& lt; br> & lt; b>结果:& lt; / b>总共纳入了8项研究,包括654例疑似AC患者。我们纳入的患者中COVID-19的患病率为82% (95% CI: 79-84%, I2: 99.2%)。处理方式方面,35% (95% CI: 26-45%, I2: 46.9%)的患者行胆囊切除术,47% (95% CI: 43-51%, I2: 54.4%)的患者采用非手术方式,19% (95% CI: 14-23%, I2: 68.1%)的患者采用经皮胆囊造口术。在我们的患者中,2级和3级的患病率分别为44%和15%。& lt; br> & lt; b>结论:& lt; / b>考虑到由于当前的大流行,推测转诊级别较高的患者数量会增加,因此早期胆囊切除术仍然是AC患者的最佳治疗选择。然而,LC似乎不是最有利的选择,因为它与COVID-19污染的风险相对较高有关。PC也可以被认为是高风险患者的一种临时和安全的方法,这可能使我们能够保护患者和医疗保健提供者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acute Cholecystitis Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

<br><b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study is to evaluate the prevalence of acute cholecystitis (AC) and review its possible management options during the COVID-19 pandemic.</br> <br><b>Methods:</b> The present systematic review and meta-analysis was done in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. In August 2021, two independent reviewers reviewed a number of articles with the aim of finding studies on the management of acute cholecystitis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Articles were searched in the Cochrane, Embassies, and Medline libraries. Using the Stata statistical software 14, the estimated pooled rates were calculated. Funnel plot and I2 indices were applied for evaluating the heterogeneity between the studies.</br> <br><b>Results:</b> An overall of 8 studies consisting of 654 patients suspected for AC were included. The prevalence of COVID-19 among our included patients was 82% (95% CI: 79-84%, I2: 99.2%). Regarding the type of management, 35% (95% CI: 26-45%, I2: 46.9%) of patients undergone cholecystectomy, 47% (95% CI: 43-51%, I2: 54.4%) were managed by non-surgical methods, and 19% (95% CI: 14-23%, I2: 68.1%) of patients were treated by percutaneous cholecystostomy. The prevalence of grade 2 and 3 among our patients was 44 and 15%, respectively.</br> <br><b>Conclusions:</b> Considering the fact that due to the current pandemic, the number of patients referring with higher grades is assumed to be increased, early cholecystectomy remains the best management option for AC patients. However, LC seems not to be the most favorable option since it is associated with a relatively higher risk of contamination with COVID-19. PC can also be considered as a temporary and safe method in high-risk patients which might enable us to protect both patients and healthcare providers.</br>.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信