系统性抗生素和益生菌治疗作为牙周炎龈下器械辅助治疗的效果:一项随机对照临床研究。

Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB Pub Date : 2022-03-23 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0583
Tatiane Caroline de Souza Ramos, Mariéllen Longo Vilas Boas, Camilla Magnoni Moretto Nunes, Camila Lopes Ferreira, Cláudio Mendes Pannuti, Mauro Pedrine Santamaria, Maria Aparecida Neves Jardini
{"title":"系统性抗生素和益生菌治疗作为牙周炎龈下器械辅助治疗的效果:一项随机对照临床研究。","authors":"Tatiane Caroline de Souza Ramos,&nbsp;Mariéllen Longo Vilas Boas,&nbsp;Camilla Magnoni Moretto Nunes,&nbsp;Camila Lopes Ferreira,&nbsp;Cláudio Mendes Pannuti,&nbsp;Mauro Pedrine Santamaria,&nbsp;Maria Aparecida Neves Jardini","doi":"10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the efficacy of two adjunct therapies (antibiotic and probiotic) for periodontal treatment based on clinical and immunological parameters in patients with Stage II and III Grade B periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>45 patients were randomly allocated into three groups: control group (CG); antibiotic group (GAtb), in which 500 mg amoxicillin + 400 mg metronidazole were used; and probiotic group (GProb), for which Lactobacillus reuteri was used. Patients received medications after undergoing periodontal debridement. Clinical and immunological parameters were assessed at baseline, 30 days, and 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All therapies reduced bleeding on probing (BoP) in the evaluated periods, and the GAtb had a greater reduction at 90 days (p=0.03). The GProb group showed better results for plaque index (PI) and gingival recession (GR) compared to the GAtb at 90 days (p=0.0014; p=0.006). The area of inflammation (PISA Index) significantly decreased in all therapies in the evaluated periods. Therapies had no significant differences regarding moderate pockets. The GAtb had a greater reduction in probing depth (PD) for deep pockets (p=0.03) at 90 days and in the number of deep pocket sites at 30 days (p=0.04). The occurrence of adverse effects was commonly reported in the GAtb as a percentage per patient. The GAtb had a significant reduction in the concentration of interleukins IL-1β and IL-8 and an increase in IL-10 and TNF-α. The CG had a reduction in IL-6 and IL-1 β, whereas in the GProb there was no difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After three months, none of the adjuvant therapies provided any additional benefit for subgingival instrumentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":321675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB","volume":" ","pages":"e20210583"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8963390/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of systemic antibiotic and probiotic therapies as adjuvant treatments of subgingival instrumentation for periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical study.\",\"authors\":\"Tatiane Caroline de Souza Ramos,&nbsp;Mariéllen Longo Vilas Boas,&nbsp;Camilla Magnoni Moretto Nunes,&nbsp;Camila Lopes Ferreira,&nbsp;Cláudio Mendes Pannuti,&nbsp;Mauro Pedrine Santamaria,&nbsp;Maria Aparecida Neves Jardini\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the efficacy of two adjunct therapies (antibiotic and probiotic) for periodontal treatment based on clinical and immunological parameters in patients with Stage II and III Grade B periodontitis.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>45 patients were randomly allocated into three groups: control group (CG); antibiotic group (GAtb), in which 500 mg amoxicillin + 400 mg metronidazole were used; and probiotic group (GProb), for which Lactobacillus reuteri was used. Patients received medications after undergoing periodontal debridement. Clinical and immunological parameters were assessed at baseline, 30 days, and 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All therapies reduced bleeding on probing (BoP) in the evaluated periods, and the GAtb had a greater reduction at 90 days (p=0.03). The GProb group showed better results for plaque index (PI) and gingival recession (GR) compared to the GAtb at 90 days (p=0.0014; p=0.006). The area of inflammation (PISA Index) significantly decreased in all therapies in the evaluated periods. Therapies had no significant differences regarding moderate pockets. The GAtb had a greater reduction in probing depth (PD) for deep pockets (p=0.03) at 90 days and in the number of deep pocket sites at 30 days (p=0.04). The occurrence of adverse effects was commonly reported in the GAtb as a percentage per patient. The GAtb had a significant reduction in the concentration of interleukins IL-1β and IL-8 and an increase in IL-10 and TNF-α. The CG had a reduction in IL-6 and IL-1 β, whereas in the GProb there was no difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After three months, none of the adjuvant therapies provided any additional benefit for subgingival instrumentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e20210583\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8963390/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0583\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究基于临床和免疫学参数评估两种辅助治疗方法(抗生素和益生菌)对II期和III期B级牙周炎患者牙周治疗的疗效。方法:将45例患者随机分为3组:对照组(CG);抗生素组(GAtb),阿莫西林500 mg +甲硝唑400 mg;益生菌组(GProb),以罗伊氏乳杆菌为组。患者在牙周清创后接受药物治疗。在基线、30天和90天评估临床和免疫学参数。结果:所有治疗方法均可在评估期内减少探查出血(BoP),且在第90天时gab降低幅度更大(p=0.03)。在第90天,GProb组在菌斑指数(PI)和牙龈萎缩(GR)方面的结果优于gtab组(p=0.0014;p = 0.006)。在评估期间,所有治疗方法的炎症面积(PISA指数)均显著降低。治疗方法在中度口袋方面没有显著差异。在第90天,GAtb对深袋的探测深度(PD)有更大的减少(p=0.03),在第30天,深袋部位的数量有更大的减少(p=0.04)。不良反应的发生通常以每个患者的百分比报告。gath显著降低白细胞介素IL-1β和IL-8的浓度,增加IL-10和TNF-α的浓度。CG降低了IL-6和IL-1 β,而在GProb中没有差异。结论:三个月后,没有任何辅助治疗为龈下内固定提供任何额外的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of systemic antibiotic and probiotic therapies as adjuvant treatments of subgingival instrumentation for periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical study.

Effect of systemic antibiotic and probiotic therapies as adjuvant treatments of subgingival instrumentation for periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical study.

Effect of systemic antibiotic and probiotic therapies as adjuvant treatments of subgingival instrumentation for periodontitis: a randomized controlled clinical study.

Objective: This study assessed the efficacy of two adjunct therapies (antibiotic and probiotic) for periodontal treatment based on clinical and immunological parameters in patients with Stage II and III Grade B periodontitis.

Methodology: 45 patients were randomly allocated into three groups: control group (CG); antibiotic group (GAtb), in which 500 mg amoxicillin + 400 mg metronidazole were used; and probiotic group (GProb), for which Lactobacillus reuteri was used. Patients received medications after undergoing periodontal debridement. Clinical and immunological parameters were assessed at baseline, 30 days, and 90 days.

Results: All therapies reduced bleeding on probing (BoP) in the evaluated periods, and the GAtb had a greater reduction at 90 days (p=0.03). The GProb group showed better results for plaque index (PI) and gingival recession (GR) compared to the GAtb at 90 days (p=0.0014; p=0.006). The area of inflammation (PISA Index) significantly decreased in all therapies in the evaluated periods. Therapies had no significant differences regarding moderate pockets. The GAtb had a greater reduction in probing depth (PD) for deep pockets (p=0.03) at 90 days and in the number of deep pocket sites at 30 days (p=0.04). The occurrence of adverse effects was commonly reported in the GAtb as a percentage per patient. The GAtb had a significant reduction in the concentration of interleukins IL-1β and IL-8 and an increase in IL-10 and TNF-α. The CG had a reduction in IL-6 and IL-1 β, whereas in the GProb there was no difference.

Conclusion: After three months, none of the adjuvant therapies provided any additional benefit for subgingival instrumentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信