中国儿童和青少年代谢综合征筛查中的肥胖措施。

Zhaoxie Tang, Chen Yang, Hao Zheng, Jiajia Jing, Xiuhong Li, Yanna Zhu
{"title":"中国儿童和青少年代谢综合征筛查中的肥胖措施。","authors":"Zhaoxie Tang,&nbsp;Chen Yang,&nbsp;Hao Zheng,&nbsp;Jiajia Jing,&nbsp;Xiuhong Li,&nbsp;Yanna Zhu","doi":"10.1515/jpem-2021-0307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing various and complicated metabolic syndrome (MetS) definitions have contributed to the difficulty in assessing MetS in children and adolescents, and therefore it is urgently needed to develop a convenient and effective screening tool for pediatric MetS. This study aimed to identify the optimal adiposity measure to screen for pediatric MetS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional data was collected from 8,150 children and adolescents aged 7-17 y living in southern China. Anthropometric indices, blood lipids, and serum glucose were determined. Results of two commonly used MetS definitions were compared: International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel Ⅲ (NCEP-ATP) modified by Cook. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed and areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated to determine the optimal index for MetS screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MetS prevalence assessed by NCEP-ATP was significantly higher than that by IDF (6.2% vs. 1.5%, p<0.001). Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) showed the highest screening power for MetS defined by both IDF and NCEP-ATP (AUC 0.932 and 0.900, respectively), and its optimal cut-off point was 0.48 by both IDF and NCEP-ATP definition (sensitivity 0.944 and 0.847, specificity 0.800 and 0.830, respectively), regardless of age or sex. When taking sex diversity into account, the optimal WHtR cut-off point was 0.49 (IDF) or 0.50 (NCEP-ATP) in boys, and 0.46 (both definitions) in girls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among children and adolescents aged 7-17 y in southern China, a WHtR greater than 0.48 can be a simple but effective screening tool for MetS.</p>","PeriodicalId":520684,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM","volume":" ","pages":"617-625"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adiposity measures in screening for metabolic syndrome among Chinese children and adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Zhaoxie Tang,&nbsp;Chen Yang,&nbsp;Hao Zheng,&nbsp;Jiajia Jing,&nbsp;Xiuhong Li,&nbsp;Yanna Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jpem-2021-0307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing various and complicated metabolic syndrome (MetS) definitions have contributed to the difficulty in assessing MetS in children and adolescents, and therefore it is urgently needed to develop a convenient and effective screening tool for pediatric MetS. This study aimed to identify the optimal adiposity measure to screen for pediatric MetS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional data was collected from 8,150 children and adolescents aged 7-17 y living in southern China. Anthropometric indices, blood lipids, and serum glucose were determined. Results of two commonly used MetS definitions were compared: International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel Ⅲ (NCEP-ATP) modified by Cook. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed and areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated to determine the optimal index for MetS screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MetS prevalence assessed by NCEP-ATP was significantly higher than that by IDF (6.2% vs. 1.5%, p<0.001). Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) showed the highest screening power for MetS defined by both IDF and NCEP-ATP (AUC 0.932 and 0.900, respectively), and its optimal cut-off point was 0.48 by both IDF and NCEP-ATP definition (sensitivity 0.944 and 0.847, specificity 0.800 and 0.830, respectively), regardless of age or sex. When taking sex diversity into account, the optimal WHtR cut-off point was 0.49 (IDF) or 0.50 (NCEP-ATP) in boys, and 0.46 (both definitions) in girls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among children and adolescents aged 7-17 y in southern China, a WHtR greater than 0.48 can be a simple but effective screening tool for MetS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"617-625\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem-2021-0307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric endocrinology & metabolism : JPEM","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpem-2021-0307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:现有的各种复杂的代谢综合征(MetS)定义给儿童和青少年的MetS评估带来了困难,因此迫切需要开发一种方便有效的儿童MetS筛查工具。本研究旨在确定最佳的肥胖措施,以筛查儿童MetS。方法:收集南方地区8150名7-17岁儿童和青少年的横断面数据。测定人体测量指标、血脂和血清葡萄糖。比较了两种常用的MetS定义:国际糖尿病联合会(IDF)和Cook修改的国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗小组Ⅲ(NCEP-ATP)。进行受试者工作特征曲线分析,并计算曲线下面积(auc),以确定MetS筛选的最佳指标。结果:NCEP-ATP评估的MetS患病率显著高于IDF (6.2% vs. 1.5%)。结论:在中国南方7-17岁的儿童和青少年中,WHtR大于0.48可以是一种简单而有效的MetS筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adiposity measures in screening for metabolic syndrome among Chinese children and adolescents.

Background: Existing various and complicated metabolic syndrome (MetS) definitions have contributed to the difficulty in assessing MetS in children and adolescents, and therefore it is urgently needed to develop a convenient and effective screening tool for pediatric MetS. This study aimed to identify the optimal adiposity measure to screen for pediatric MetS.

Methods: The cross-sectional data was collected from 8,150 children and adolescents aged 7-17 y living in southern China. Anthropometric indices, blood lipids, and serum glucose were determined. Results of two commonly used MetS definitions were compared: International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel Ⅲ (NCEP-ATP) modified by Cook. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were performed and areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated to determine the optimal index for MetS screening.

Results: MetS prevalence assessed by NCEP-ATP was significantly higher than that by IDF (6.2% vs. 1.5%, p<0.001). Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) showed the highest screening power for MetS defined by both IDF and NCEP-ATP (AUC 0.932 and 0.900, respectively), and its optimal cut-off point was 0.48 by both IDF and NCEP-ATP definition (sensitivity 0.944 and 0.847, specificity 0.800 and 0.830, respectively), regardless of age or sex. When taking sex diversity into account, the optimal WHtR cut-off point was 0.49 (IDF) or 0.50 (NCEP-ATP) in boys, and 0.46 (both definitions) in girls.

Conclusions: Among children and adolescents aged 7-17 y in southern China, a WHtR greater than 0.48 can be a simple but effective screening tool for MetS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信