{"title":"激光和抗血管内皮生长因子治疗老年性黄斑变性患者类德鲁松色素上皮脱离:24个月的结果。","authors":"Hyeong Min Kim, Na-Kyung Ryoo, Kyu Hyung Park","doi":"10.1007/s00417-022-05625-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>After the 12-month interim safety analysis, we investigated the 24-month primary endpoint outcomes of drusenoid pigment epithelial detachment (dPED) after laser and intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one patients with treatment-naïve bilateral intermediate AMD with dPED and visual acuity ≤ 83 letters (Snellen 20/23) were enrolled. The subject eye received low-energy PASCAL® laser (532 nm) treatment, and the fellow eye was used as the control. Intravitreal injections were administered at 3-month intervals from baseline to 12 months. Treatment outcomes, safety and development of advanced AMD lesions were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean drusen area and dPED height were significantly reduced (17.3 ± 2.7% vs. 112.8 ± 3.1%, P < 0.001 and 11.8 ± 4.7% vs. 119.1 ± 4.6%, P < 0.001, respectively) and the mean BCVA improved (5.11 ± 1.35 vs. 0.83 ± 1.03 letters, P = 0.014) in the study eyes compared to those in the control eyes. Development of parafoveal iRORA (nGA) (67%, 12 of 18 eyes) and cRORA (GA) (22%, 4 of 18 eyes) was observed in the study eyes, whereas three cases of iRORA and cRORA in the control eyes (17%, 3 of 18 eyes; P = 0.010 and P = 0.791, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laser and anti-VEGF treatment may be a potential treatment option for intermediate AMD with dPED. However, considering the relatively high rate of secondary iRORA and cRORA development, long-term follow-up is mandatory to clarify the safety and efficacy of this treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":520634,"journal":{"name":"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie","volume":" ","pages":"2549-2559"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laser and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for drusenoid pigment epithelial detachment in age-related macular degeneration: 24-month outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Hyeong Min Kim, Na-Kyung Ryoo, Kyu Hyung Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00417-022-05625-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>After the 12-month interim safety analysis, we investigated the 24-month primary endpoint outcomes of drusenoid pigment epithelial detachment (dPED) after laser and intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one patients with treatment-naïve bilateral intermediate AMD with dPED and visual acuity ≤ 83 letters (Snellen 20/23) were enrolled. The subject eye received low-energy PASCAL® laser (532 nm) treatment, and the fellow eye was used as the control. Intravitreal injections were administered at 3-month intervals from baseline to 12 months. Treatment outcomes, safety and development of advanced AMD lesions were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean drusen area and dPED height were significantly reduced (17.3 ± 2.7% vs. 112.8 ± 3.1%, P < 0.001 and 11.8 ± 4.7% vs. 119.1 ± 4.6%, P < 0.001, respectively) and the mean BCVA improved (5.11 ± 1.35 vs. 0.83 ± 1.03 letters, P = 0.014) in the study eyes compared to those in the control eyes. Development of parafoveal iRORA (nGA) (67%, 12 of 18 eyes) and cRORA (GA) (22%, 4 of 18 eyes) was observed in the study eyes, whereas three cases of iRORA and cRORA in the control eyes (17%, 3 of 18 eyes; P = 0.010 and P = 0.791, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laser and anti-VEGF treatment may be a potential treatment option for intermediate AMD with dPED. However, considering the relatively high rate of secondary iRORA and cRORA development, long-term follow-up is mandatory to clarify the safety and efficacy of this treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2549-2559\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05625-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05625-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:经过12个月的中期安全性分析,我们研究了激光和玻璃体内抗vegf治疗后24个月的主要终点结局。方法:选取视力≤83字母(Snellen 20/23)的treatment-naïve双侧中度AMD患者21例。受试者眼接受低能量PASCAL®激光(532 nm)治疗,另一只眼作为对照。从基线到12个月,每隔3个月进行玻璃体内注射。分析晚期AMD病变的治疗效果、安全性和发展情况。结果:平均结节面积和dPED高度显著降低(17.3±2.7% vs. 112.8±3.1%)P结论:激光联合抗vegf治疗可能是中度AMD合并dPED的潜在治疗选择。然而,考虑到继发性iora和cRORA的发生率相对较高,必须进行长期随访以明确该治疗的安全性和有效性。
Laser and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for drusenoid pigment epithelial detachment in age-related macular degeneration: 24-month outcomes.
Purpose: After the 12-month interim safety analysis, we investigated the 24-month primary endpoint outcomes of drusenoid pigment epithelial detachment (dPED) after laser and intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment.
Methods: Twenty-one patients with treatment-naïve bilateral intermediate AMD with dPED and visual acuity ≤ 83 letters (Snellen 20/23) were enrolled. The subject eye received low-energy PASCAL® laser (532 nm) treatment, and the fellow eye was used as the control. Intravitreal injections were administered at 3-month intervals from baseline to 12 months. Treatment outcomes, safety and development of advanced AMD lesions were analyzed.
Results: The mean drusen area and dPED height were significantly reduced (17.3 ± 2.7% vs. 112.8 ± 3.1%, P < 0.001 and 11.8 ± 4.7% vs. 119.1 ± 4.6%, P < 0.001, respectively) and the mean BCVA improved (5.11 ± 1.35 vs. 0.83 ± 1.03 letters, P = 0.014) in the study eyes compared to those in the control eyes. Development of parafoveal iRORA (nGA) (67%, 12 of 18 eyes) and cRORA (GA) (22%, 4 of 18 eyes) was observed in the study eyes, whereas three cases of iRORA and cRORA in the control eyes (17%, 3 of 18 eyes; P = 0.010 and P = 0.791, respectively).
Conclusions: Laser and anti-VEGF treatment may be a potential treatment option for intermediate AMD with dPED. However, considering the relatively high rate of secondary iRORA and cRORA development, long-term follow-up is mandatory to clarify the safety and efficacy of this treatment.