你被陷害了!信息需要的先决条件如何调节风险沟通信息的效果。

T Terpstra, R Zaalberg, J de Boer, W J W Botzen
{"title":"你被陷害了!信息需要的先决条件如何调节风险沟通信息的效果。","authors":"T Terpstra,&nbsp;R Zaalberg,&nbsp;J de Boer,&nbsp;W J W Botzen","doi":"10.1111/risa.12181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates the processes that mediate the effects of framing flood risks on people's information needs. Insight into the effects of risk frames is important for developing balanced risk communication that explains both risks and benefits of living near water. The research was inspired by the risk information seeking and processing model and related models. In a web-based survey, respondents (n = 1,457) were randomly assigned to one of three communication frames or a control frame (experimental conditions). Each frame identically explained flood risk and additionally refined the message by emphasizing climate change, the quality of flood risk management, or the amenities of living near water. We tested the extent to which risk perceptions, trust, and affective responses mediate the framing effects on information need. As expected, the frames on average resulted in higher information need than the control frame. Attempts to lower fear appeal by stressing safety or amenities instead of climate change were marginally successful, a phenomenon that is known as a \"negativity bias.\" Framing effects were mediated by negative attributes (risk perception and negative affect) but not by positive attributes (trust and positive affect). This finding calls for theoretical refinement. Practically, communication messages will be more effective when they stimulate risk perceptions and evoke negative affect. However, arousal of fear may have unwanted side effects. For instance, fear arousal could lead to lower levels of trust in risk management among citizens. Regular monitoring of citizens' attitudes is important to prevent extreme levels of distrust or cynicism. </p>","PeriodicalId":517072,"journal":{"name":"Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis","volume":" ","pages":"1506-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/risa.12181","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"You have been framed! How antecedents of information need mediate the effects of risk communication messages.\",\"authors\":\"T Terpstra,&nbsp;R Zaalberg,&nbsp;J de Boer,&nbsp;W J W Botzen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/risa.12181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates the processes that mediate the effects of framing flood risks on people's information needs. Insight into the effects of risk frames is important for developing balanced risk communication that explains both risks and benefits of living near water. The research was inspired by the risk information seeking and processing model and related models. In a web-based survey, respondents (n = 1,457) were randomly assigned to one of three communication frames or a control frame (experimental conditions). Each frame identically explained flood risk and additionally refined the message by emphasizing climate change, the quality of flood risk management, or the amenities of living near water. We tested the extent to which risk perceptions, trust, and affective responses mediate the framing effects on information need. As expected, the frames on average resulted in higher information need than the control frame. Attempts to lower fear appeal by stressing safety or amenities instead of climate change were marginally successful, a phenomenon that is known as a \\\"negativity bias.\\\" Framing effects were mediated by negative attributes (risk perception and negative affect) but not by positive attributes (trust and positive affect). This finding calls for theoretical refinement. Practically, communication messages will be more effective when they stimulate risk perceptions and evoke negative affect. However, arousal of fear may have unwanted side effects. For instance, fear arousal could lead to lower levels of trust in risk management among citizens. Regular monitoring of citizens' attitudes is important to prevent extreme levels of distrust or cynicism. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":517072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1506-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/risa.12181\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

本研究探讨了洪水风险框架对人们信息需求影响的中介过程。深入了解风险框架的影响对于发展平衡的风险沟通非常重要,这种沟通可以解释生活在水边的风险和好处。本文的研究受到了风险信息寻找与处理模型及相关模型的启发。在一项基于网络的调查中,受访者(n = 1457)被随机分配到三个通信框架或控制框架(实验条件)中的一个。每个框架都相同地解释了洪水风险,并通过强调气候变化、洪水风险管理的质量或生活在水附近的便利设施来进一步完善信息。我们测试了风险感知、信任和情感反应在多大程度上调解了信息需求的框架效应。正如预期的那样,这些帧平均比控制帧产生更高的信息需求。试图通过强调安全或舒适而不是气候变化来降低恐惧吸引力的尝试收效甚微,这种现象被称为“消极偏见”。框架效应受负性属性(风险感知和负性情感)的调节,而不受正性属性(信任和正性情感)的调节。这一发现需要理论上的改进。实际上,当沟通信息刺激风险认知并引起负面影响时,沟通信息将更有效。然而,恐惧的唤起可能会产生意想不到的副作用。例如,恐惧唤起可能导致公民对风险管理的信任度降低。定期监测公民的态度对于防止极端程度的不信任或玩世不恭非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
You have been framed! How antecedents of information need mediate the effects of risk communication messages.

This study investigates the processes that mediate the effects of framing flood risks on people's information needs. Insight into the effects of risk frames is important for developing balanced risk communication that explains both risks and benefits of living near water. The research was inspired by the risk information seeking and processing model and related models. In a web-based survey, respondents (n = 1,457) were randomly assigned to one of three communication frames or a control frame (experimental conditions). Each frame identically explained flood risk and additionally refined the message by emphasizing climate change, the quality of flood risk management, or the amenities of living near water. We tested the extent to which risk perceptions, trust, and affective responses mediate the framing effects on information need. As expected, the frames on average resulted in higher information need than the control frame. Attempts to lower fear appeal by stressing safety or amenities instead of climate change were marginally successful, a phenomenon that is known as a "negativity bias." Framing effects were mediated by negative attributes (risk perception and negative affect) but not by positive attributes (trust and positive affect). This finding calls for theoretical refinement. Practically, communication messages will be more effective when they stimulate risk perceptions and evoke negative affect. However, arousal of fear may have unwanted side effects. For instance, fear arousal could lead to lower levels of trust in risk management among citizens. Regular monitoring of citizens' attitudes is important to prevent extreme levels of distrust or cynicism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信