早期声门癌激光切除后与放疗、放化疗后语音质量的比较。

IF 1.3
Masayuki Tomifuji, Koji Araki, Katsuki Niwa, Yoshihiro Miyagawa, Daisuke Mizokami, Yoko Kitagawa, Taku Yamashita, Takeshi Matsunobu, Akihiro Shiotani
{"title":"早期声门癌激光切除后与放疗、放化疗后语音质量的比较。","authors":"Masayuki Tomifuji,&nbsp;Koji Araki,&nbsp;Katsuki Niwa,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Miyagawa,&nbsp;Daisuke Mizokami,&nbsp;Yoko Kitagawa,&nbsp;Taku Yamashita,&nbsp;Takeshi Matsunobu,&nbsp;Akihiro Shiotani","doi":"10.1159/000346934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>The present study aimed to compare the voice quality after each type of cordectomy with that after radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for early glottic carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Procedures: </strong>The GRBAS perceptive scale [consisting of 5 domains: grade (G), roughness (R), breathiness (B), asthenia (A), and strain (S)], aerodynamic tests and acoustic analyses, and the Voice Handicap Index questionnaire were evaluated for 58 laser cordectomy cases and 40 RT or CRT cases. Multiple comparison tests were conducted between each type of cordectomy and RT or CRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical difference was found between type I/II cordectomy and RT for T1 glottic carcinoma (T1RT), whereas T1RT showed a significantly better outcome than type III cordectomy (G score: p = 0.016, maximum phonation time: p < 0.01, mean flow rate: p < 0.01). Type IV cordectomy was equivalent to RT or CRT for T2 glottic carcinoma (T2RT/CRT), while types V and VI showed a worse voice quality than T2RT/CRT (G score: p = 0.038 to type VI, B score: p = 0.025 to type V and p = 0.032 to type VI, A score: p = 0.017 to type VI).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Voice quality after laser cordectomy differs according to the type of cordectomy. Surgeons should inform patients about the expected voice quality after each treatment modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":520736,"journal":{"name":"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties","volume":" ","pages":"18-26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000346934","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of voice quality after laser cordectomy with that after radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for early glottic carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Masayuki Tomifuji,&nbsp;Koji Araki,&nbsp;Katsuki Niwa,&nbsp;Yoshihiro Miyagawa,&nbsp;Daisuke Mizokami,&nbsp;Yoko Kitagawa,&nbsp;Taku Yamashita,&nbsp;Takeshi Matsunobu,&nbsp;Akihiro Shiotani\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000346934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>The present study aimed to compare the voice quality after each type of cordectomy with that after radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for early glottic carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Procedures: </strong>The GRBAS perceptive scale [consisting of 5 domains: grade (G), roughness (R), breathiness (B), asthenia (A), and strain (S)], aerodynamic tests and acoustic analyses, and the Voice Handicap Index questionnaire were evaluated for 58 laser cordectomy cases and 40 RT or CRT cases. Multiple comparison tests were conducted between each type of cordectomy and RT or CRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistical difference was found between type I/II cordectomy and RT for T1 glottic carcinoma (T1RT), whereas T1RT showed a significantly better outcome than type III cordectomy (G score: p = 0.016, maximum phonation time: p < 0.01, mean flow rate: p < 0.01). Type IV cordectomy was equivalent to RT or CRT for T2 glottic carcinoma (T2RT/CRT), while types V and VI showed a worse voice quality than T2RT/CRT (G score: p = 0.038 to type VI, B score: p = 0.025 to type V and p = 0.032 to type VI, A score: p = 0.017 to type VI).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Voice quality after laser cordectomy differs according to the type of cordectomy. Surgeons should inform patients about the expected voice quality after each treatment modality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"18-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000346934\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000346934\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000346934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

研究目的:本研究旨在比较早期声门癌各种类型的声带切除术后与放疗(RT)或放化疗(CRT)后的语音质量。方法:采用GRBAS感知量表(由等级(G)、粗糙度(R)、呼吸(B)、乏力(A)和张力(S) 5个域组成)、空气动力学测试和声学分析以及语音障碍指数问卷对58例激光corectomy和40例RT或CRT患者进行评估。各种类型的脊髓切除术与RT或CRT进行了多次比较试验。结果:T1级声门癌(T1RT) I/II型声带切除术与RT治疗效果无统计学差异,而T1RT治疗效果明显优于III型声带切除术(G评分:p = 0.016,最大发声时间:p < 0.01,平均流速:p < 0.01)。T2声门癌(T2RT/CRT)的IV型声带切除术与RT或CRT相当,而V型和VI型患者的语音质量较T2RT/CRT差(G评分:p = 0.038至VI型,B评分:p = 0.025至V型,p = 0.032至VI型,a评分:p = 0.017至VI型)。结论:激光声带切除术后的语音质量因声带切除术类型不同而不同。外科医生应告知患者在每种治疗方式后预期的语音质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of voice quality after laser cordectomy with that after radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for early glottic carcinoma.

Purpose of the study: The present study aimed to compare the voice quality after each type of cordectomy with that after radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for early glottic carcinoma.

Procedures: The GRBAS perceptive scale [consisting of 5 domains: grade (G), roughness (R), breathiness (B), asthenia (A), and strain (S)], aerodynamic tests and acoustic analyses, and the Voice Handicap Index questionnaire were evaluated for 58 laser cordectomy cases and 40 RT or CRT cases. Multiple comparison tests were conducted between each type of cordectomy and RT or CRT.

Results: No statistical difference was found between type I/II cordectomy and RT for T1 glottic carcinoma (T1RT), whereas T1RT showed a significantly better outcome than type III cordectomy (G score: p = 0.016, maximum phonation time: p < 0.01, mean flow rate: p < 0.01). Type IV cordectomy was equivalent to RT or CRT for T2 glottic carcinoma (T2RT/CRT), while types V and VI showed a worse voice quality than T2RT/CRT (G score: p = 0.038 to type VI, B score: p = 0.025 to type V and p = 0.032 to type VI, A score: p = 0.017 to type VI).

Conclusions: Voice quality after laser cordectomy differs according to the type of cordectomy. Surgeons should inform patients about the expected voice quality after each treatment modality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信