慢性腰痛的治疗选择。一项随机盲法临床试验。

Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) Pub Date : 2013-04-01
Mahmoud E Nazzal, Mohammed A Saadah, Loai M Saadah, Mahmoud A Al-Omari, Ziad A Al-Oudat, Mohammed S Nazzal, Mahfoud Y El-Beshari, Amani A Al-Zaabi, Yousif I Alnuaimi
{"title":"慢性腰痛的治疗选择。一项随机盲法临床试验。","authors":"Mahmoud E Nazzal,&nbsp;Mohammed A Saadah,&nbsp;Loai M Saadah,&nbsp;Mahmoud A Al-Omari,&nbsp;Ziad A Al-Oudat,&nbsp;Mohammed S Nazzal,&nbsp;Mahfoud Y El-Beshari,&nbsp;Amani A Al-Zaabi,&nbsp;Yousif I Alnuaimi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare efficacies of 2 active programs in the management of chronic low back pain (CLBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, stratified, randomized single-blinded controlled study was conducted in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, King Abdullah University Hospital, Irbid, Jordan, between February and December 2010. A total of 100 patients were randomized to either 6-weeks of multidisciplinary rehabilitation (group A) or therapist-assisted exercise (group B). At baseline and 6 weeks, the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score was estimated, as a primary outcome measure. McGill pain score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), trunk forward flexion and extension, left and right lateral bending, were applied before and after treatment and were employed as secondary outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All outcome measures significantly improved in group A after treatment, compared with group B. The VAS, McGill, ODI scores, left and right lateral bending decreased significantly, whereas forward and backward bending increased. A significant number of patients returned to work in group A at the end of 6 weeks, compared with group B. These effects were maintained over 12 and 24 weeks of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multidisciplinary rehabilitation improved functional indices and pain scale scores in group A compared with B. This would be an effective strategy in CLBP management.</p>","PeriodicalId":520723,"journal":{"name":"Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)","volume":" ","pages":"152-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management options of chronic low back pain. A randomized blinded clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud E Nazzal,&nbsp;Mohammed A Saadah,&nbsp;Loai M Saadah,&nbsp;Mahmoud A Al-Omari,&nbsp;Ziad A Al-Oudat,&nbsp;Mohammed S Nazzal,&nbsp;Mahfoud Y El-Beshari,&nbsp;Amani A Al-Zaabi,&nbsp;Yousif I Alnuaimi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare efficacies of 2 active programs in the management of chronic low back pain (CLBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, stratified, randomized single-blinded controlled study was conducted in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, King Abdullah University Hospital, Irbid, Jordan, between February and December 2010. A total of 100 patients were randomized to either 6-weeks of multidisciplinary rehabilitation (group A) or therapist-assisted exercise (group B). At baseline and 6 weeks, the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score was estimated, as a primary outcome measure. McGill pain score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), trunk forward flexion and extension, left and right lateral bending, were applied before and after treatment and were employed as secondary outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All outcome measures significantly improved in group A after treatment, compared with group B. The VAS, McGill, ODI scores, left and right lateral bending decreased significantly, whereas forward and backward bending increased. A significant number of patients returned to work in group A at the end of 6 weeks, compared with group B. These effects were maintained over 12 and 24 weeks of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multidisciplinary rehabilitation improved functional indices and pain scale scores in group A compared with B. This would be an effective strategy in CLBP management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"152-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较两种积极方案治疗慢性腰痛(CLBP)的疗效。方法:这项前瞻性、分层、随机、单盲对照研究于2010年2月至12月在约旦伊尔比德阿卜杜拉国王大学医院康复医学部进行。共有100名患者被随机分配到6周的多学科康复(A组)或治疗师辅助运动(B组)。在基线和6周时,评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分,作为主要结局指标。治疗前后应用McGill疼痛评分、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)、躯干前屈和前伸、左右侧屈作为次要观察指标。结果:A组治疗后各项指标均较b组明显改善,VAS评分、McGill评分、ODI评分、左、右侧屈度明显降低,前、后屈度明显升高。与b组相比,A组患者在6周结束时恢复工作的人数显著增加,这些效果在12周和24周的随访中保持不变。结论:与b组相比,多学科康复改善了A组的功能指标和疼痛评分,这将是CLBP治疗的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management options of chronic low back pain. A randomized blinded clinical trial.

Objective: To compare efficacies of 2 active programs in the management of chronic low back pain (CLBP).

Methods: This prospective, stratified, randomized single-blinded controlled study was conducted in the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, King Abdullah University Hospital, Irbid, Jordan, between February and December 2010. A total of 100 patients were randomized to either 6-weeks of multidisciplinary rehabilitation (group A) or therapist-assisted exercise (group B). At baseline and 6 weeks, the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score was estimated, as a primary outcome measure. McGill pain score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), trunk forward flexion and extension, left and right lateral bending, were applied before and after treatment and were employed as secondary outcome measures.

Results: All outcome measures significantly improved in group A after treatment, compared with group B. The VAS, McGill, ODI scores, left and right lateral bending decreased significantly, whereas forward and backward bending increased. A significant number of patients returned to work in group A at the end of 6 weeks, compared with group B. These effects were maintained over 12 and 24 weeks of follow-up.

Conclusion: Multidisciplinary rehabilitation improved functional indices and pain scale scores in group A compared with B. This would be an effective strategy in CLBP management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信