教学物体-图片匹配提高发育障碍个体对物体和图片偏好的一致性:初步研究。

Duong Minh Nguyen, C T Yu, Toby L Martin, Pamela Fregeau, Cheryl Pogorzelec, Garry L Martin
{"title":"教学物体-图片匹配提高发育障碍个体对物体和图片偏好的一致性:初步研究。","authors":"Duong Minh Nguyen,&nbsp;C T Yu,&nbsp;Toby L Martin,&nbsp;Pamela Fregeau,&nbsp;Cheryl Pogorzelec,&nbsp;Garry L Martin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We evaluated teaching object-picture matching to improve concordance between preference assessments using objects and pictures of the same objects. Three participants with developmental disabilities who showed high and low preferences during assessments with objects but not with pictures were taught object-picture matching tasks unrelated to the items used during preference assessments. Training was evaluated in a modified multiple-baseline design and preference assessments with objects and pictures were repeated after training each object-picture matching task. Two participants showed improved concordance after mastering two and three training tasks, respectively. The third participant did not show concordance between object and picture preference assessments after mastering two tasks and after additional training. Our findings suggested that object-picture matching might be a prerequisite for picture preference assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":93663,"journal":{"name":"Journal on developmental disabilities = Le journal sur les handicaps du development [sic.]","volume":"15 1","pages":"53-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3607582/pdf/nihms2615.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching Object-Picture Matching to Improve Concordance between Object and Picture Preferences for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities: Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Duong Minh Nguyen,&nbsp;C T Yu,&nbsp;Toby L Martin,&nbsp;Pamela Fregeau,&nbsp;Cheryl Pogorzelec,&nbsp;Garry L Martin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We evaluated teaching object-picture matching to improve concordance between preference assessments using objects and pictures of the same objects. Three participants with developmental disabilities who showed high and low preferences during assessments with objects but not with pictures were taught object-picture matching tasks unrelated to the items used during preference assessments. Training was evaluated in a modified multiple-baseline design and preference assessments with objects and pictures were repeated after training each object-picture matching task. Two participants showed improved concordance after mastering two and three training tasks, respectively. The third participant did not show concordance between object and picture preference assessments after mastering two tasks and after additional training. Our findings suggested that object-picture matching might be a prerequisite for picture preference assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal on developmental disabilities = Le journal sur les handicaps du development [sic.]\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"53-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3607582/pdf/nihms2615.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal on developmental disabilities = Le journal sur les handicaps du development [sic.]\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on developmental disabilities = Le journal sur les handicaps du development [sic.]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们评估了教学对象-图片匹配,以提高使用相同对象的对象和图片的偏好评估之间的一致性。三名发育障碍的参与者在对物体而不是图片的偏好评估中表现出高偏好和低偏好,他们被教导与偏好评估中使用的项目无关的物体-图片匹配任务。在改进的多基线设计中对训练进行评估,并在训练每个物体-图像匹配任务后重复对物体和图像进行偏好评估。两名参与者分别在掌握了两个和三个训练任务后表现出了改善的一致性。第三个被试在掌握了两项任务和额外的训练后,在物体和图像偏好评估中没有表现出一致性。我们的研究结果表明,物体-图像匹配可能是图像偏好评估的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teaching Object-Picture Matching to Improve Concordance between Object and Picture Preferences for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities: Pilot Study.

We evaluated teaching object-picture matching to improve concordance between preference assessments using objects and pictures of the same objects. Three participants with developmental disabilities who showed high and low preferences during assessments with objects but not with pictures were taught object-picture matching tasks unrelated to the items used during preference assessments. Training was evaluated in a modified multiple-baseline design and preference assessments with objects and pictures were repeated after training each object-picture matching task. Two participants showed improved concordance after mastering two and three training tasks, respectively. The third participant did not show concordance between object and picture preference assessments after mastering two tasks and after additional training. Our findings suggested that object-picture matching might be a prerequisite for picture preference assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信