作为人类的许多方式,斯蒂芬·j·古尔德对古人类学的遗产(2002-2012)。

Telmo Pievani
{"title":"作为人类的许多方式,斯蒂芬·j·古尔德对古人类学的遗产(2002-2012)。","authors":"Telmo Pievani","doi":"10.4436/jass.90016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As an invertebrate palaeontologist and evolutionary theorist, Stephen J. Gould did not publish any direct experimental results in palaeo-anthropology (with the exception of Pilbeam and Gould, 1974), but he did prepare the stage for many debates within the discipline. We argue here that his scientific legacy in the anthropological fields has a clear and coherent conceptual structure. It is based on four main pillars: (1) the famed deconstruction of the \"ladder of progress\" as an influential metaphor in human evolution; (2) Punctuated Equilibria and their significance in human macro-evolution viewed as a directionless \"bushy tree\" of species; (3) the trade-offs between functional and structural factors in evolution and the notion of exaptation; (4) delayed growth, or neoteny, as an evidence in human evolution. These keystones should be considered as consequences of the enduring theoretical legacy of the eminent Harvard evolutionist: the proposal of an extended and revised Darwinism, coherently outlined in the last twenty years of his life (1982-2002) and set out in 2002 in his final work, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. It is in the light of his \"Darwinian pluralism\", able to integrate in a new frame the multiplicity of explanatory patterns emerging from different evolutionary fields, that we understand Stephen J. Gould's legacy in palaeo-anthropology today, both in terms of provocative shocks to comfortable visions of human evolution and, above all, in terms of specific scientific predictions about future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":171465,"journal":{"name":"Journal of anthropological sciences = Rivista di antropologia : JASS","volume":" ","pages":"133-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4436/jass.90016","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Many ways of being human, the Stephen J. Gould's legacy to Palaeo-Anthropology (2002-2012).\",\"authors\":\"Telmo Pievani\",\"doi\":\"10.4436/jass.90016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As an invertebrate palaeontologist and evolutionary theorist, Stephen J. Gould did not publish any direct experimental results in palaeo-anthropology (with the exception of Pilbeam and Gould, 1974), but he did prepare the stage for many debates within the discipline. We argue here that his scientific legacy in the anthropological fields has a clear and coherent conceptual structure. It is based on four main pillars: (1) the famed deconstruction of the \\\"ladder of progress\\\" as an influential metaphor in human evolution; (2) Punctuated Equilibria and their significance in human macro-evolution viewed as a directionless \\\"bushy tree\\\" of species; (3) the trade-offs between functional and structural factors in evolution and the notion of exaptation; (4) delayed growth, or neoteny, as an evidence in human evolution. These keystones should be considered as consequences of the enduring theoretical legacy of the eminent Harvard evolutionist: the proposal of an extended and revised Darwinism, coherently outlined in the last twenty years of his life (1982-2002) and set out in 2002 in his final work, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. It is in the light of his \\\"Darwinian pluralism\\\", able to integrate in a new frame the multiplicity of explanatory patterns emerging from different evolutionary fields, that we understand Stephen J. Gould's legacy in palaeo-anthropology today, both in terms of provocative shocks to comfortable visions of human evolution and, above all, in terms of specific scientific predictions about future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":171465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of anthropological sciences = Rivista di antropologia : JASS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"133-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4436/jass.90016\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of anthropological sciences = Rivista di antropologia : JASS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4436/jass.90016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of anthropological sciences = Rivista di antropologia : JASS","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4436/jass.90016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

作为一名无脊椎古生物学家和进化理论家,斯蒂芬·j·古尔德(Stephen J. Gould)没有发表任何古人类学的直接实验结果(除了Pilbeam和Gould, 1974),但他确实为该学科内的许多辩论做好了准备。我们认为,他在人类学领域的科学遗产具有清晰而连贯的概念结构。它基于四个主要支柱:(1)著名的“进步阶梯”解构,作为人类进化的一个有影响力的隐喻;(2)间断平衡及其在人类宏观进化中的意义,被视为一棵没有方向的物种“灌木树”;(3)演化过程中功能因素与结构因素之间的权衡关系;(4)作为人类进化证据的生长迟缓或发育迟缓。这些基石应该被视为这位杰出的哈佛进化论者持久的理论遗产的结果:他提出了一种扩展和修正的达尔文主义,在他生命的最后二十年(1982-2002)中进行了连贯的概述,并在2002年在他的最后一部作品《进化论的结构》中提出。正是在他的“达尔文多元主义”的指引下,我们才能将不同进化领域出现的多种解释模式整合到一个新的框架中,从而理解斯蒂芬·j·古尔德在今天的古人类学遗产,无论是从对人类进化的舒适愿景的挑衅冲击,还是最重要的,从对未来研究的具体科学预测方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Many ways of being human, the Stephen J. Gould's legacy to Palaeo-Anthropology (2002-2012).

As an invertebrate palaeontologist and evolutionary theorist, Stephen J. Gould did not publish any direct experimental results in palaeo-anthropology (with the exception of Pilbeam and Gould, 1974), but he did prepare the stage for many debates within the discipline. We argue here that his scientific legacy in the anthropological fields has a clear and coherent conceptual structure. It is based on four main pillars: (1) the famed deconstruction of the "ladder of progress" as an influential metaphor in human evolution; (2) Punctuated Equilibria and their significance in human macro-evolution viewed as a directionless "bushy tree" of species; (3) the trade-offs between functional and structural factors in evolution and the notion of exaptation; (4) delayed growth, or neoteny, as an evidence in human evolution. These keystones should be considered as consequences of the enduring theoretical legacy of the eminent Harvard evolutionist: the proposal of an extended and revised Darwinism, coherently outlined in the last twenty years of his life (1982-2002) and set out in 2002 in his final work, The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. It is in the light of his "Darwinian pluralism", able to integrate in a new frame the multiplicity of explanatory patterns emerging from different evolutionary fields, that we understand Stephen J. Gould's legacy in palaeo-anthropology today, both in terms of provocative shocks to comfortable visions of human evolution and, above all, in terms of specific scientific predictions about future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信