作为咯血患者出血部位预测因素的影像学表现:分丸双能CT血管造影与数字减影血管造影的比较。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Pankaj Meena, Ashu Seith Bhalla, Ankur Goyal, Priyanka Naranje, Korukanti Pradeep Kumar
{"title":"作为咯血患者出血部位预测因素的影像学表现:分丸双能CT血管造影与数字减影血管造影的比较。","authors":"Pankaj Meena,&nbsp;Ashu Seith Bhalla,&nbsp;Ankur Goyal,&nbsp;Priyanka Naranje,&nbsp;Korukanti Pradeep Kumar","doi":"10.5152/dir.2022.20548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PURPOSE Systemic to pulmonary vasculature shunting (SPS) is an important finding to identify the probable site of bleeding, especially in multicentric parenchymal lung disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of imaging findings, which can locate SPS on dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DECTA), and correlate with digital subtraction angiography (DSA), which was considered as a gold standard. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 187 patients (148 males, 39 females, mean age: 43.7 ± 15.1 years) between October 2014 and November 2018 who underwent both DECTA and DSA. Computed tomography angiography was performed using dual-source (80 and 140kV), 2 × 128 slice equipment, using 50-80mL iodinated contrast (400mg iodine/mL). These patients were divided into shunting (group A) and non-shunting groups (group B), based on the presence or absence of signs of shunting on DECTA. Group A had 98 and group B had 89 patients. We analyzed the following imaging signs for identifying SPS: (1) non-tapering pulmonary artery sign, (2) clustering of vessels sign, and (3) significant differential attenuation sign (>25 HU difference in attenuation between segmental pulmonary arteries of shunting side and normal non-shunting side was considered significant). The correlation was done with DSA to identify the presence of SPS. RESULTS In 187 patients, 281 lobes were evaluated to look for the signs of shunting from systemic artery to pulmonary vessels on DECTA. A total of 98 patients who showed signs of shunting on DECTA presented 135 lobes with parenchymal, with or without pleural, abnormalities. Of these, 84 patients had one or more aspergilloma in the lobe where shunting was seen. In one patient, a specific artery could not be cannulated due to a tortuous course; hence, all arteries which were seen on CTA causing shunting were also seen on DSA. Non-tapering pulmonary artery segmental branches were seen in 97 (99%) patients, clustering of systemic vessels was seen in 90 (91.8%) patients, and significant attenuation difference was seen in 74 (75.5%) patients. In the rest of the 89 patients, 146 lobes were assessed but no signs of shunting were seen on DECTA. Nine arteries in 8 patients showed shunting on DSA, while the rest did not show any shunting. Digital subtraction angiography correlation showed 96.4%, 100%, 100%, and 93.8% of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, respectively, for DECTA in detecting SPS on a per artery basis. CONCLUSION The proposed signs on DECTA help in identifying the systemic vessels that cause shunting, and hence, the most likely bleeding site, which aids in planning the endovascular management by targeting specific arteries in case of multicentric disease. Being the gold standard, DSA is an ideal modality for detecting very small SPSs and in classifying the latter.</p>","PeriodicalId":50582,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"344-351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9634921/pdf/dir-28-4-344.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imaging findings as predictors of the site of bleeding in patients with hemoptysis: Comparison between split-bolus dual-energy CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography.\",\"authors\":\"Pankaj Meena,&nbsp;Ashu Seith Bhalla,&nbsp;Ankur Goyal,&nbsp;Priyanka Naranje,&nbsp;Korukanti Pradeep Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/dir.2022.20548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>PURPOSE Systemic to pulmonary vasculature shunting (SPS) is an important finding to identify the probable site of bleeding, especially in multicentric parenchymal lung disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of imaging findings, which can locate SPS on dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DECTA), and correlate with digital subtraction angiography (DSA), which was considered as a gold standard. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 187 patients (148 males, 39 females, mean age: 43.7 ± 15.1 years) between October 2014 and November 2018 who underwent both DECTA and DSA. Computed tomography angiography was performed using dual-source (80 and 140kV), 2 × 128 slice equipment, using 50-80mL iodinated contrast (400mg iodine/mL). These patients were divided into shunting (group A) and non-shunting groups (group B), based on the presence or absence of signs of shunting on DECTA. Group A had 98 and group B had 89 patients. We analyzed the following imaging signs for identifying SPS: (1) non-tapering pulmonary artery sign, (2) clustering of vessels sign, and (3) significant differential attenuation sign (>25 HU difference in attenuation between segmental pulmonary arteries of shunting side and normal non-shunting side was considered significant). The correlation was done with DSA to identify the presence of SPS. RESULTS In 187 patients, 281 lobes were evaluated to look for the signs of shunting from systemic artery to pulmonary vessels on DECTA. A total of 98 patients who showed signs of shunting on DECTA presented 135 lobes with parenchymal, with or without pleural, abnormalities. Of these, 84 patients had one or more aspergilloma in the lobe where shunting was seen. In one patient, a specific artery could not be cannulated due to a tortuous course; hence, all arteries which were seen on CTA causing shunting were also seen on DSA. Non-tapering pulmonary artery segmental branches were seen in 97 (99%) patients, clustering of systemic vessels was seen in 90 (91.8%) patients, and significant attenuation difference was seen in 74 (75.5%) patients. In the rest of the 89 patients, 146 lobes were assessed but no signs of shunting were seen on DECTA. Nine arteries in 8 patients showed shunting on DSA, while the rest did not show any shunting. Digital subtraction angiography correlation showed 96.4%, 100%, 100%, and 93.8% of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, respectively, for DECTA in detecting SPS on a per artery basis. CONCLUSION The proposed signs on DECTA help in identifying the systemic vessels that cause shunting, and hence, the most likely bleeding site, which aids in planning the endovascular management by targeting specific arteries in case of multicentric disease. Being the gold standard, DSA is an ideal modality for detecting very small SPSs and in classifying the latter.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"344-351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9634921/pdf/dir-28-4-344.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2022.20548\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2022.20548","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:全身到肺血管分流(SPS)是鉴别可能出血部位的重要发现,特别是在多中心肺实质疾病中。本研究的目的是评估成像结果的价值,这些发现可以在双能计算机断层血管造影(DECTA)上定位SPS,并与被认为是金标准的数字减影血管造影(DSA)相关联。方法回顾性分析2014年10月至2018年11月同时行DECTA和DSA治疗的187例患者(男性148例,女性39例,平均年龄43.7±15.1岁)。计算机断层血管造影采用双源(80和140kV), 2 × 128片设备,使用50-80mL碘化造影剂(400mg碘/mL)。根据DECTA上是否存在分流迹象,将这些患者分为分流组(A组)和非分流组(B组)。A组98例,B组89例。我们分析了识别SPS的以下影像学征象:(1)非锥形肺动脉征象,(2)血管聚集征象,(3)明显的差异衰减征象(分流侧与正常非分流侧肺段动脉衰减>25 HU的差异被认为是显著的)。与DSA进行相关性以确定SPS的存在。结果在187例患者中,281个肺叶在DECTA上被评估以寻找从全身动脉到肺血管分流的迹象。共有98例患者在DECTA上显示分流迹象,其中135个肺叶伴实质,伴或不伴胸膜异常。其中,84例患者的肺叶有一个或多个曲菌瘤。在一名患者中,由于路程曲折,某一特定动脉无法插管;因此,所有在CTA上看到的引起分流的动脉在DSA上也能看到。97例(99%)患者出现肺动脉节段性分支未变细,90例(91.8%)患者出现全身血管聚集,74例(75.5%)患者出现明显的衰减差异。在其余89例患者中,对146个肺叶进行了评估,但在DECTA上没有发现分流的迹象。8例患者中9例动脉在DSA上显示分流,其余未显示分流。数字减影血管造影相关性显示,以每条动脉为基础,DECTA检测SPS的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为96.4%、100%、100%和93.8%。结论:在多中心疾病的情况下,DECTA上提出的体征有助于识别引起分流的全身血管,从而确定最可能的出血部位,这有助于制定针对特定动脉的血管内治疗计划。作为金标准,DSA是检测非常小的SPSs并对后者进行分类的理想方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Imaging findings as predictors of the site of bleeding in patients with hemoptysis: Comparison between split-bolus dual-energy CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

Imaging findings as predictors of the site of bleeding in patients with hemoptysis: Comparison between split-bolus dual-energy CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

PURPOSE Systemic to pulmonary vasculature shunting (SPS) is an important finding to identify the probable site of bleeding, especially in multicentric parenchymal lung disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of imaging findings, which can locate SPS on dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DECTA), and correlate with digital subtraction angiography (DSA), which was considered as a gold standard. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 187 patients (148 males, 39 females, mean age: 43.7 ± 15.1 years) between October 2014 and November 2018 who underwent both DECTA and DSA. Computed tomography angiography was performed using dual-source (80 and 140kV), 2 × 128 slice equipment, using 50-80mL iodinated contrast (400mg iodine/mL). These patients were divided into shunting (group A) and non-shunting groups (group B), based on the presence or absence of signs of shunting on DECTA. Group A had 98 and group B had 89 patients. We analyzed the following imaging signs for identifying SPS: (1) non-tapering pulmonary artery sign, (2) clustering of vessels sign, and (3) significant differential attenuation sign (>25 HU difference in attenuation between segmental pulmonary arteries of shunting side and normal non-shunting side was considered significant). The correlation was done with DSA to identify the presence of SPS. RESULTS In 187 patients, 281 lobes were evaluated to look for the signs of shunting from systemic artery to pulmonary vessels on DECTA. A total of 98 patients who showed signs of shunting on DECTA presented 135 lobes with parenchymal, with or without pleural, abnormalities. Of these, 84 patients had one or more aspergilloma in the lobe where shunting was seen. In one patient, a specific artery could not be cannulated due to a tortuous course; hence, all arteries which were seen on CTA causing shunting were also seen on DSA. Non-tapering pulmonary artery segmental branches were seen in 97 (99%) patients, clustering of systemic vessels was seen in 90 (91.8%) patients, and significant attenuation difference was seen in 74 (75.5%) patients. In the rest of the 89 patients, 146 lobes were assessed but no signs of shunting were seen on DECTA. Nine arteries in 8 patients showed shunting on DSA, while the rest did not show any shunting. Digital subtraction angiography correlation showed 96.4%, 100%, 100%, and 93.8% of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value, respectively, for DECTA in detecting SPS on a per artery basis. CONCLUSION The proposed signs on DECTA help in identifying the systemic vessels that cause shunting, and hence, the most likely bleeding site, which aids in planning the endovascular management by targeting specific arteries in case of multicentric disease. Being the gold standard, DSA is an ideal modality for detecting very small SPSs and in classifying the latter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信