Fredric M Pieracci, Carlton C Barnett, Nicole Townsend, Ernest E Moore, Jeffery Johnson, Walter Biffl, Denis D Bensard, Clay C Burlew, Andrew Gerber, Christopher C Silliman
{"title":"外科危重病人输血后红细胞压积反应中的性别二态性。","authors":"Fredric M Pieracci, Carlton C Barnett, Nicole Townsend, Ernest E Moore, Jeffery Johnson, Walter Biffl, Denis D Bensard, Clay C Burlew, Andrew Gerber, Christopher C Silliman","doi":"10.5402/2012/298345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The change in hematocrit (ΔHct) following packed red blood cell (pRBCs) transfusion is a clinically relevant measurement of transfusion efficacy that is influenced by post-transfusion hemolysis. Sexual dimorphism has been observed in critical illness and may be related to gender-specific differences in immune response. We investigated the relationship between both donor and recipient gender and ΔHct in an analysis of all pRBCs transfusions in our surgical intensive care unit (2006-2009). The relationship between both donor and recipient gender and ΔHct (% points) was assessed using both univariate and multivariable analysis. A total of 575 units of pRBCs were given to 342 patients; 289 (49.9%) donors were male. By univariate analysis, ΔHct was significantly greater for female as compared to male recipients (3.81% versus 2.82%, resp., P < 0.01). No association was observed between donor gender and ΔHct, which was 3.02% following receipt of female blood versus 3.23% following receipt of male blood (P = 0.21). By multivariable analysis, recipient gender remained associated significantly with ΔHct (P < 0.01). In conclusion, recipient gender is independently associated with ΔHct following pRBCs transfusion. This association does not appear related to either demographic or anthropomorphic factors, raising the possibility of gender-related differences in recipient immune response to transfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":14727,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"298345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2012/298345","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexual dimorphism in hematocrit response following red blood cell transfusion of critically ill surgical patients.\",\"authors\":\"Fredric M Pieracci, Carlton C Barnett, Nicole Townsend, Ernest E Moore, Jeffery Johnson, Walter Biffl, Denis D Bensard, Clay C Burlew, Andrew Gerber, Christopher C Silliman\",\"doi\":\"10.5402/2012/298345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The change in hematocrit (ΔHct) following packed red blood cell (pRBCs) transfusion is a clinically relevant measurement of transfusion efficacy that is influenced by post-transfusion hemolysis. Sexual dimorphism has been observed in critical illness and may be related to gender-specific differences in immune response. We investigated the relationship between both donor and recipient gender and ΔHct in an analysis of all pRBCs transfusions in our surgical intensive care unit (2006-2009). The relationship between both donor and recipient gender and ΔHct (% points) was assessed using both univariate and multivariable analysis. A total of 575 units of pRBCs were given to 342 patients; 289 (49.9%) donors were male. By univariate analysis, ΔHct was significantly greater for female as compared to male recipients (3.81% versus 2.82%, resp., P < 0.01). No association was observed between donor gender and ΔHct, which was 3.02% following receipt of female blood versus 3.23% following receipt of male blood (P = 0.21). By multivariable analysis, recipient gender remained associated significantly with ΔHct (P < 0.01). In conclusion, recipient gender is independently associated with ΔHct following pRBCs transfusion. This association does not appear related to either demographic or anthropomorphic factors, raising the possibility of gender-related differences in recipient immune response to transfusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"298345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2012/298345\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/298345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/3/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/298345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
填充红细胞(prbc)输血后红细胞压积(ΔHct)的变化是输血疗效的临床相关测量,输血后溶血会影响其疗效。在危重疾病中已观察到两性二态现象,这可能与免疫反应的性别特异性差异有关。我们调查了供体和受体性别与ΔHct之间的关系,分析了2006-2009年外科重症监护病房的所有红细胞输注。使用单变量和多变量分析评估供体和受体性别与ΔHct(百分点)之间的关系。342例患者共接受575个单位的红细胞;男性289例(49.9%)。通过单变量分析,ΔHct在女性接受者中显著高于男性接受者(3.81%比2.82%,分别为3.81%和2.82%)。, p < 0.01)。供血者性别与ΔHct之间没有关联,接受女性血液后为3.02%,接受男性血液后为3.23% (P = 0.21)。多变量分析显示,受体性别与ΔHct有显著相关性(P < 0.01)。总之,输血后受体性别与ΔHct独立相关。这种关联似乎与人口统计学或拟人化因素无关,这提高了受体对输血免疫反应的性别相关差异的可能性。
Sexual dimorphism in hematocrit response following red blood cell transfusion of critically ill surgical patients.
The change in hematocrit (ΔHct) following packed red blood cell (pRBCs) transfusion is a clinically relevant measurement of transfusion efficacy that is influenced by post-transfusion hemolysis. Sexual dimorphism has been observed in critical illness and may be related to gender-specific differences in immune response. We investigated the relationship between both donor and recipient gender and ΔHct in an analysis of all pRBCs transfusions in our surgical intensive care unit (2006-2009). The relationship between both donor and recipient gender and ΔHct (% points) was assessed using both univariate and multivariable analysis. A total of 575 units of pRBCs were given to 342 patients; 289 (49.9%) donors were male. By univariate analysis, ΔHct was significantly greater for female as compared to male recipients (3.81% versus 2.82%, resp., P < 0.01). No association was observed between donor gender and ΔHct, which was 3.02% following receipt of female blood versus 3.23% following receipt of male blood (P = 0.21). By multivariable analysis, recipient gender remained associated significantly with ΔHct (P < 0.01). In conclusion, recipient gender is independently associated with ΔHct following pRBCs transfusion. This association does not appear related to either demographic or anthropomorphic factors, raising the possibility of gender-related differences in recipient immune response to transfusion.