比较不同的计划干预对超重和肥胖个体脂肪消耗变化的促进作用:一项随机对照试验。

Urte Scholz, Sibylle Ochsner, Aleksandra Luszczynska
{"title":"比较不同的计划干预对超重和肥胖个体脂肪消耗变化的促进作用:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Urte Scholz,&nbsp;Sibylle Ochsner,&nbsp;Aleksandra Luszczynska","doi":"10.1080/00207594.2012.661061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Single planning interventions have been found to promote short-term dietary change. Repeated planning interventions may foster long-term effects on behavior change. It remains unknown whether there is a critical number of boosters to establish long-term maintenance of behavioral changes. This study aimed at investigating what social-cognitive variables mediate the effects of the interventions on dietary behavior change. Overall, 373 participants (n = 270 women, 72.4%; age M = 52.42, SD = 12.79) were randomly allocated to one of five groups: a control group, a single planning group, and three groups with 3, 6, or 9 weeks' repeated planning interventions. Follow-ups took place 4, 6, and 12 months after baseline. Change in fat consumption was not promoted by any of the interventions. In terms of social-cognitive variables, intentions, self-efficacy and coping planning displayed a time × group interaction, with the 9 weeks' planning group showing the most beneficial effects. Effect sizes, however, were very small. None of the tested planning interventions successfully promoted change in fat consumption across the 12 month period. This, however, could not be explained by problems with adherence to the intervention protocol. Potential explanations for this unexpected result are discussed. </p>","PeriodicalId":351827,"journal":{"name":"International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie","volume":" ","pages":"604-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00207594.2012.661061","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing different boosters of planning interventions on changes in fat consumption in overweight and obese individuals: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Urte Scholz,&nbsp;Sibylle Ochsner,&nbsp;Aleksandra Luszczynska\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00207594.2012.661061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Single planning interventions have been found to promote short-term dietary change. Repeated planning interventions may foster long-term effects on behavior change. It remains unknown whether there is a critical number of boosters to establish long-term maintenance of behavioral changes. This study aimed at investigating what social-cognitive variables mediate the effects of the interventions on dietary behavior change. Overall, 373 participants (n = 270 women, 72.4%; age M = 52.42, SD = 12.79) were randomly allocated to one of five groups: a control group, a single planning group, and three groups with 3, 6, or 9 weeks' repeated planning interventions. Follow-ups took place 4, 6, and 12 months after baseline. Change in fat consumption was not promoted by any of the interventions. In terms of social-cognitive variables, intentions, self-efficacy and coping planning displayed a time × group interaction, with the 9 weeks' planning group showing the most beneficial effects. Effect sizes, however, were very small. None of the tested planning interventions successfully promoted change in fat consumption across the 12 month period. This, however, could not be explained by problems with adherence to the intervention protocol. Potential explanations for this unexpected result are discussed. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":351827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"604-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00207594.2012.661061\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.661061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/4/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.661061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

单一计划干预已被发现可促进短期饮食改变。重复的计划干预可能会对行为改变产生长期影响。目前尚不清楚是否有一定数量的助推器来建立行为改变的长期维持。本研究旨在探讨社会认知变量介导干预对饮食行为改变的影响。总共有373名参与者(n = 270名女性,占72.4%;年龄M = 52.42, SD = 12.79),随机分为5组:对照组、单一计划组和3组,分别进行3、6、9周的重复计划干预。随访在基线后4、6和12个月进行。任何干预措施都没有促进脂肪消耗的变化。在社会认知变量方面,意向、自我效能感和应对计划表现出时间×组的交互作用,其中以9周计划组效果最好。然而,效应量非常小。经过测试的计划干预措施中,没有一项成功地促进了12个月期间脂肪消耗的变化。然而,这不能用遵守干预方案的问题来解释。对这一意外结果的可能解释进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing different boosters of planning interventions on changes in fat consumption in overweight and obese individuals: a randomized controlled trial.

Single planning interventions have been found to promote short-term dietary change. Repeated planning interventions may foster long-term effects on behavior change. It remains unknown whether there is a critical number of boosters to establish long-term maintenance of behavioral changes. This study aimed at investigating what social-cognitive variables mediate the effects of the interventions on dietary behavior change. Overall, 373 participants (n = 270 women, 72.4%; age M = 52.42, SD = 12.79) were randomly allocated to one of five groups: a control group, a single planning group, and three groups with 3, 6, or 9 weeks' repeated planning interventions. Follow-ups took place 4, 6, and 12 months after baseline. Change in fat consumption was not promoted by any of the interventions. In terms of social-cognitive variables, intentions, self-efficacy and coping planning displayed a time × group interaction, with the 9 weeks' planning group showing the most beneficial effects. Effect sizes, however, were very small. None of the tested planning interventions successfully promoted change in fat consumption across the 12 month period. This, however, could not be explained by problems with adherence to the intervention protocol. Potential explanations for this unexpected result are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信