麻醉对大鼠蛛网膜下腔出血后病理生理及死亡率的影响。

Konstantin Hockel, Raimund Trabold, Karsten Schöller, Elisabeth Török, Nikolaus Plesnila
{"title":"麻醉对大鼠蛛网膜下腔出血后病理生理及死亡率的影响。","authors":"Konstantin Hockel,&nbsp;Raimund Trabold,&nbsp;Karsten Schöller,&nbsp;Elisabeth Török,&nbsp;Nikolaus Plesnila","doi":"10.1186/2040-7378-4-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anesthesia is indispensable for in vivo research but has the intrinsic potential to alter study results. The aim of the current study was to investigate the impact of three common anesthesia protocols on physiological parameters and outcome following the most common experimental model for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), endovascular perforation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 38) were randomly assigned to (1) chloral hydrate, (2) isoflurane or (3) midazolam/medetomidine/fentanyl (MMF) anesthesia. Arterial blood gases, intracranial pressure (ICP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) were monitored before and for 3 hours after SAH. Brain water content, mortality and rate of secondary bleeding were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under baseline conditions isoflurane anesthesia resulted in deterioration of respiratory parameters (arterial pCO2 and pO2) and increased brain water content. After SAH, isoflurane and chloral hydrate were associated with reduced MAP, incomplete recovery of post-hemorrhagic rCBF (23 ± 13% and 87 ± 18% of baseline, respectively) and a high anesthesia-related mortality (17 and 50%, respectively). Anesthesia with MMF provided stable hemodynamics (MAP between 100-110 mmHg), high post-hemorrhagic rCBF values, and a high rate of re-bleedings (> 50%), a phenomenon often observed after SAH in humans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these findings we recommend anesthesia with MMF for the endovascular perforation model of SAH.</p>","PeriodicalId":12158,"journal":{"name":"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2040-7378-4-5","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of anesthesia on pathophysiology and mortality following subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantin Hockel,&nbsp;Raimund Trabold,&nbsp;Karsten Schöller,&nbsp;Elisabeth Török,&nbsp;Nikolaus Plesnila\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/2040-7378-4-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anesthesia is indispensable for in vivo research but has the intrinsic potential to alter study results. The aim of the current study was to investigate the impact of three common anesthesia protocols on physiological parameters and outcome following the most common experimental model for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), endovascular perforation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 38) were randomly assigned to (1) chloral hydrate, (2) isoflurane or (3) midazolam/medetomidine/fentanyl (MMF) anesthesia. Arterial blood gases, intracranial pressure (ICP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) were monitored before and for 3 hours after SAH. Brain water content, mortality and rate of secondary bleeding were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Under baseline conditions isoflurane anesthesia resulted in deterioration of respiratory parameters (arterial pCO2 and pO2) and increased brain water content. After SAH, isoflurane and chloral hydrate were associated with reduced MAP, incomplete recovery of post-hemorrhagic rCBF (23 ± 13% and 87 ± 18% of baseline, respectively) and a high anesthesia-related mortality (17 and 50%, respectively). Anesthesia with MMF provided stable hemodynamics (MAP between 100-110 mmHg), high post-hemorrhagic rCBF values, and a high rate of re-bleedings (> 50%), a phenomenon often observed after SAH in humans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on these findings we recommend anesthesia with MMF for the endovascular perforation model of SAH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/2040-7378-4-5\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-7378-4-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2040-7378-4-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

背景:麻醉在体内研究中是必不可少的,但也有改变研究结果的内在潜力。本研究的目的是探讨三种常见麻醉方案对蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)最常见的实验模型(血管内穿孔)的生理参数和结果的影响。方法:将38只sd - dawley大鼠随机分为(1)水合氯醛、(2)异氟醚和(3)咪达唑仑/美托咪定/芬太尼(MMF)麻醉组。监测动脉血气、颅内压(ICP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、脑灌注压(CPP)、脑区域血流量(rCBF)。脑含水量、死亡率和继发性出血率也进行了评估。结果:在基线条件下,异氟醚麻醉导致呼吸参数(动脉pCO2和pO2)恶化,脑含水量增加。SAH后,异氟醚和水合氯醛与MAP降低、出血性rCBF不完全恢复(分别为基线的23±13%和87±18%)和高麻醉相关死亡率(分别为17%和50%)相关。MMF麻醉提供稳定的血流动力学(MAP在100-110 mmHg之间),高出血性rCBF值和高再出血率(> 50%),这是人类SAH后经常观察到的现象。结论:基于这些发现,我们推荐MMF麻醉用于SAH血管内穿孔模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of anesthesia on pathophysiology and mortality following subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats.

Impact of anesthesia on pathophysiology and mortality following subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats.

Impact of anesthesia on pathophysiology and mortality following subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats.

Impact of anesthesia on pathophysiology and mortality following subarachnoid hemorrhage in rats.

Background: Anesthesia is indispensable for in vivo research but has the intrinsic potential to alter study results. The aim of the current study was to investigate the impact of three common anesthesia protocols on physiological parameters and outcome following the most common experimental model for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), endovascular perforation.

Methods: Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 38) were randomly assigned to (1) chloral hydrate, (2) isoflurane or (3) midazolam/medetomidine/fentanyl (MMF) anesthesia. Arterial blood gases, intracranial pressure (ICP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) were monitored before and for 3 hours after SAH. Brain water content, mortality and rate of secondary bleeding were also evaluated.

Results: Under baseline conditions isoflurane anesthesia resulted in deterioration of respiratory parameters (arterial pCO2 and pO2) and increased brain water content. After SAH, isoflurane and chloral hydrate were associated with reduced MAP, incomplete recovery of post-hemorrhagic rCBF (23 ± 13% and 87 ± 18% of baseline, respectively) and a high anesthesia-related mortality (17 and 50%, respectively). Anesthesia with MMF provided stable hemodynamics (MAP between 100-110 mmHg), high post-hemorrhagic rCBF values, and a high rate of re-bleedings (> 50%), a phenomenon often observed after SAH in humans.

Conclusion: Based on these findings we recommend anesthesia with MMF for the endovascular perforation model of SAH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信