Zeynep Nur Akcaboy, Erkan Yavuz Akcaboy, Ozlem Balkız Soyal, Guldane Turhan, Nermin Gogus
{"title":"麻黄碱预处理能否有效缓解罗库溴铵注射疼痛?","authors":"Zeynep Nur Akcaboy, Erkan Yavuz Akcaboy, Ozlem Balkız Soyal, Guldane Turhan, Nermin Gogus","doi":"10.1159/000336582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the effect of ephedrine pretreatment on the intensity of rocuronium injection pain when rocuronium was applied by timing principle and also to compare this effect with lidocaine and placebo.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>120 American Society of Anesthesiology risk score I-II patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomized into three groups to receive either 70 μg/kg ephedrine (ephedrine group, n = 40) or 0.5 mg/kg lidocaine (lidocaine group, n = 40) or 5 ml NaCl 0.9% (placebo group, n = 40) as pretreatment. Thirty seconds after pretreatment drugs, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was administered by the timing principle and rocuronium injection pain scores were recorded. Twenty seconds after rocuronium administration, anesthesia was induced with thiopental and the patient's trachea was intubated. Hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall frequency of having pain was 82.5, 52.5 and 22.5% in placebo, ephedrine and lidocaine groups, respectively. Although the frequency of mild and moderate pain scores was higher in the ephedrine group than in the lidocaine group, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.032 and p = 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although not as effective as lidocaine 0.5 mg/kg, 70 μg/kg ephedrine pretreatment was able to alleviate rocuronium injection pain when rocuronium was applied by timing principle.</p>","PeriodicalId":520708,"journal":{"name":"Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre","volume":" ","pages":"323-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000336582","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can ephedrine pretreatment be effective in alleviating rocuronium injection pain?\",\"authors\":\"Zeynep Nur Akcaboy, Erkan Yavuz Akcaboy, Ozlem Balkız Soyal, Guldane Turhan, Nermin Gogus\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000336582\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the effect of ephedrine pretreatment on the intensity of rocuronium injection pain when rocuronium was applied by timing principle and also to compare this effect with lidocaine and placebo.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>120 American Society of Anesthesiology risk score I-II patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomized into three groups to receive either 70 μg/kg ephedrine (ephedrine group, n = 40) or 0.5 mg/kg lidocaine (lidocaine group, n = 40) or 5 ml NaCl 0.9% (placebo group, n = 40) as pretreatment. Thirty seconds after pretreatment drugs, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was administered by the timing principle and rocuronium injection pain scores were recorded. Twenty seconds after rocuronium administration, anesthesia was induced with thiopental and the patient's trachea was intubated. Hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall frequency of having pain was 82.5, 52.5 and 22.5% in placebo, ephedrine and lidocaine groups, respectively. Although the frequency of mild and moderate pain scores was higher in the ephedrine group than in the lidocaine group, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.032 and p = 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although not as effective as lidocaine 0.5 mg/kg, 70 μg/kg ephedrine pretreatment was able to alleviate rocuronium injection pain when rocuronium was applied by timing principle.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"323-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000336582\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000336582\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/3/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000336582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
目的:本研究采用随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的方法,评价麻黄碱预处理对罗库溴铵定时应用时注射疼痛强度的影响,并与利多卡因、安慰剂进行比较。对象和方法:120例美国麻醉学会风险评分I-II分的全麻择期手术患者随机分为3组,分别给予70 μg/kg麻黄碱(麻黄碱组,n = 40)或0.5 mg/kg利多卡因(利多卡因组,n = 40)或5 ml NaCl 0.9%(安慰剂组,n = 40)作为预处理。预处理用药后30秒,按定时原则给药罗库溴铵0.6 mg/kg,记录罗库溴铵注射疼痛评分。罗库溴铵给药后20秒,用硫喷妥钠诱导麻醉,插管。记录血流动力学参数及不良反应。结果:安慰剂组、麻黄碱组和利多卡因组疼痛发生率分别为82.5%、52.5%和22.5%。虽然麻黄碱组轻度和中度疼痛评分频率高于利多卡因组,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.032, p = 0.001)。结论:70 μg/kg麻黄碱预处理虽不如0.5 mg/kg利多卡因有效,但在罗库溴铵定时应用的情况下,能有效缓解罗库溴铵注射疼痛。
Can ephedrine pretreatment be effective in alleviating rocuronium injection pain?
Objective: The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the effect of ephedrine pretreatment on the intensity of rocuronium injection pain when rocuronium was applied by timing principle and also to compare this effect with lidocaine and placebo.
Subjects and methods: 120 American Society of Anesthesiology risk score I-II patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were randomized into three groups to receive either 70 μg/kg ephedrine (ephedrine group, n = 40) or 0.5 mg/kg lidocaine (lidocaine group, n = 40) or 5 ml NaCl 0.9% (placebo group, n = 40) as pretreatment. Thirty seconds after pretreatment drugs, rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg was administered by the timing principle and rocuronium injection pain scores were recorded. Twenty seconds after rocuronium administration, anesthesia was induced with thiopental and the patient's trachea was intubated. Hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects were recorded.
Results: The overall frequency of having pain was 82.5, 52.5 and 22.5% in placebo, ephedrine and lidocaine groups, respectively. Although the frequency of mild and moderate pain scores was higher in the ephedrine group than in the lidocaine group, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.032 and p = 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion: Although not as effective as lidocaine 0.5 mg/kg, 70 μg/kg ephedrine pretreatment was able to alleviate rocuronium injection pain when rocuronium was applied by timing principle.