Andaç Barkin Bavbek, Arife Dogan, Murat Cavit Cehreli
{"title":"种植体-牙支撑假体的生物力学:中远端种植体角度和假体连接方式的影响。","authors":"Andaç Barkin Bavbek, Arife Dogan, Murat Cavit Cehreli","doi":"10.5301/JABB.2011.8565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of implant angulation and its possible influence on prosthetic connection as regards implant/tooth strains in a combined implant and natural tooth abutment fixed partial denture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A natural tooth was embedded between vertically-aligned and 17° angulated implants in a polymethyl methacrylate acrylic resin model. Three designs (Group 1: tooth and vertically-aligned implant; Group 2: tooth and 17° angulated implant, Group 3: tooth and vertically-aligned implant having a different prosthetic connection to Group 1) of tooth-implant supported prostheses (n=4) were fabricated. Strain gauges were bonded on the prostheses and on the approximal sides of the natural tooth abutment and implants. Once the test fixed partial dentures were seated, a static load of 150 N was applied to each prosthesis. During testing, strain-gauge signals were digitalized by a data acquisition system and this signal was stored and assessed with corresponding software at a sample rate of 10 KHz.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data were then evaluated using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests at 95% confidence level. Mesiodistal tilting of implants increased peri-implant strains in implant-tooth supported prostheses during torque-tightening and under load. The mode of prosthesis connection may affect strains within the prosthesis and natural tooth abutments, although its impact under static loading conditions seems negligible.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This investigation suggests that mesiodistal tilting of implants may have a biomechanical effect in tooth-implant supported prostheses.</p>","PeriodicalId":51074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics","volume":"9 2","pages":"118-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5301/JABB.2011.8565","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanics of implant-tooth supported prostheses: effects of mesiodistal implant angulation and mode of prosthesis connection.\",\"authors\":\"Andaç Barkin Bavbek, Arife Dogan, Murat Cavit Cehreli\",\"doi\":\"10.5301/JABB.2011.8565\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of implant angulation and its possible influence on prosthetic connection as regards implant/tooth strains in a combined implant and natural tooth abutment fixed partial denture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A natural tooth was embedded between vertically-aligned and 17° angulated implants in a polymethyl methacrylate acrylic resin model. Three designs (Group 1: tooth and vertically-aligned implant; Group 2: tooth and 17° angulated implant, Group 3: tooth and vertically-aligned implant having a different prosthetic connection to Group 1) of tooth-implant supported prostheses (n=4) were fabricated. Strain gauges were bonded on the prostheses and on the approximal sides of the natural tooth abutment and implants. Once the test fixed partial dentures were seated, a static load of 150 N was applied to each prosthesis. During testing, strain-gauge signals were digitalized by a data acquisition system and this signal was stored and assessed with corresponding software at a sample rate of 10 KHz.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data were then evaluated using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests at 95% confidence level. Mesiodistal tilting of implants increased peri-implant strains in implant-tooth supported prostheses during torque-tightening and under load. The mode of prosthesis connection may affect strains within the prosthesis and natural tooth abutments, although its impact under static loading conditions seems negligible.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This investigation suggests that mesiodistal tilting of implants may have a biomechanical effect in tooth-implant supported prostheses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"118-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5301/JABB.2011.8565\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5301/JABB.2011.8565\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5301/JABB.2011.8565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Biomechanics of implant-tooth supported prostheses: effects of mesiodistal implant angulation and mode of prosthesis connection.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of implant angulation and its possible influence on prosthetic connection as regards implant/tooth strains in a combined implant and natural tooth abutment fixed partial denture.
Methods: A natural tooth was embedded between vertically-aligned and 17° angulated implants in a polymethyl methacrylate acrylic resin model. Three designs (Group 1: tooth and vertically-aligned implant; Group 2: tooth and 17° angulated implant, Group 3: tooth and vertically-aligned implant having a different prosthetic connection to Group 1) of tooth-implant supported prostheses (n=4) were fabricated. Strain gauges were bonded on the prostheses and on the approximal sides of the natural tooth abutment and implants. Once the test fixed partial dentures were seated, a static load of 150 N was applied to each prosthesis. During testing, strain-gauge signals were digitalized by a data acquisition system and this signal was stored and assessed with corresponding software at a sample rate of 10 KHz.
Results: The data were then evaluated using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests at 95% confidence level. Mesiodistal tilting of implants increased peri-implant strains in implant-tooth supported prostheses during torque-tightening and under load. The mode of prosthesis connection may affect strains within the prosthesis and natural tooth abutments, although its impact under static loading conditions seems negligible.
Conclusions: This investigation suggests that mesiodistal tilting of implants may have a biomechanical effect in tooth-implant supported prostheses.