采用概率方法设计和体外测试一种新型患者特异性全膝关节假体。

Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering Pub Date : 2022-05-09 Print Date: 2022-08-26 DOI:10.1515/bmt-2021-0136
İsmail H Korkmaz, İrfan Kaymaz, Ömer S Yıldırım, Fahri Murat, Halim Kovacı
{"title":"采用概率方法设计和体外测试一种新型患者特异性全膝关节假体。","authors":"İsmail H Korkmaz,&nbsp;İrfan Kaymaz,&nbsp;Ömer S Yıldırım,&nbsp;Fahri Murat,&nbsp;Halim Kovacı","doi":"10.1515/bmt-2021-0136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to prevent failure as well as ensure comfort, patient-specific modelling for prostheses has been gaining interest. However, deterministic analyses have been widely used in the design process without considering any variation/uncertainties related to the design parameters of such prostheses. Therefore, this study aims to compare the performance of patient-specific anatomic Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with off-the-shelf TKA. In the patient-specific model, the femoral condyle curves were considered in the femoral component's inner and outer surface design. The tibial component was designed to completely cover the tibia cutting surface. <i>In vitro</i> experiments were conducted to compare these two models in terms of loosening of the components. A probabilistic approach based on the finite element method was also used to compute the probability of failure of both models. According to the deterministic analysis results, 103.10 and 21.67 MPa von Mises stress values were obtained for the femoral component and cement in the anatomical model, while these values were 175.86 and 25.76 MPa, respectively, for the conventional model. In order to predict loosening damage due to local osteolysis or stress shield, it was determined that the deformation values in the examined cement structures were 15% lower in the anatomical model. According to probabilistic analysis results, it was observed that the probability of encountering an extreme value for the anatomical model is far less than that of the conventional model. This indicates that the anatomical model is safer than the conventional model, considering the failure scenarios in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":93905,"journal":{"name":"Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering","volume":" ","pages":"295-305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing and <i>in vitro</i> testing of a novel patient-specific total knee prosthesis using the probabilistic approach.\",\"authors\":\"İsmail H Korkmaz,&nbsp;İrfan Kaymaz,&nbsp;Ömer S Yıldırım,&nbsp;Fahri Murat,&nbsp;Halim Kovacı\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/bmt-2021-0136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In order to prevent failure as well as ensure comfort, patient-specific modelling for prostheses has been gaining interest. However, deterministic analyses have been widely used in the design process without considering any variation/uncertainties related to the design parameters of such prostheses. Therefore, this study aims to compare the performance of patient-specific anatomic Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with off-the-shelf TKA. In the patient-specific model, the femoral condyle curves were considered in the femoral component's inner and outer surface design. The tibial component was designed to completely cover the tibia cutting surface. <i>In vitro</i> experiments were conducted to compare these two models in terms of loosening of the components. A probabilistic approach based on the finite element method was also used to compute the probability of failure of both models. According to the deterministic analysis results, 103.10 and 21.67 MPa von Mises stress values were obtained for the femoral component and cement in the anatomical model, while these values were 175.86 and 25.76 MPa, respectively, for the conventional model. In order to predict loosening damage due to local osteolysis or stress shield, it was determined that the deformation values in the examined cement structures were 15% lower in the anatomical model. According to probabilistic analysis results, it was observed that the probability of encountering an extreme value for the anatomical model is far less than that of the conventional model. This indicates that the anatomical model is safer than the conventional model, considering the failure scenarios in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"295-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2021-0136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2021-0136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了防止失败并确保舒适,针对患者的假肢建模已经引起了人们的兴趣。然而,确定性分析在设计过程中被广泛使用,而没有考虑与此类假体设计参数相关的任何变化/不确定性。因此,本研究旨在比较患者特异性解剖全膝关节置换术(TKA)与现成的全膝关节置换术(TKA)的性能。在患者特异性模型中,股骨髁曲线在股骨假体的内外表面设计中被考虑。胫骨组件被设计成完全覆盖胫骨切割面。通过体外实验比较两种模型在构件松动方面的差异。采用基于有限元法的概率方法计算了两种模型的失效概率。根据确定性分析结果,解剖模型股骨假体和骨水泥的von Mises应力值分别为103.10和21.67 MPa,而常规模型的von Mises应力值分别为175.86和25.76 MPa。为了预测由于局部骨溶解或应力屏蔽引起的松动损伤,我们确定在解剖模型中所检查的水泥结构中的变形值要低15%。从概率分析结果可以看出,该解剖模型遇到极值的概率远小于常规模型。这表明,考虑到本研究的失效情况,该解剖模型比传统模型更安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing and in vitro testing of a novel patient-specific total knee prosthesis using the probabilistic approach.

In order to prevent failure as well as ensure comfort, patient-specific modelling for prostheses has been gaining interest. However, deterministic analyses have been widely used in the design process without considering any variation/uncertainties related to the design parameters of such prostheses. Therefore, this study aims to compare the performance of patient-specific anatomic Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) with off-the-shelf TKA. In the patient-specific model, the femoral condyle curves were considered in the femoral component's inner and outer surface design. The tibial component was designed to completely cover the tibia cutting surface. In vitro experiments were conducted to compare these two models in terms of loosening of the components. A probabilistic approach based on the finite element method was also used to compute the probability of failure of both models. According to the deterministic analysis results, 103.10 and 21.67 MPa von Mises stress values were obtained for the femoral component and cement in the anatomical model, while these values were 175.86 and 25.76 MPa, respectively, for the conventional model. In order to predict loosening damage due to local osteolysis or stress shield, it was determined that the deformation values in the examined cement structures were 15% lower in the anatomical model. According to probabilistic analysis results, it was observed that the probability of encountering an extreme value for the anatomical model is far less than that of the conventional model. This indicates that the anatomical model is safer than the conventional model, considering the failure scenarios in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信