治疗进行性近视会使眼科护理人员不堪重负吗?劳动力模型研究。

IF 2.4
Gareth Lingham, James Loughman, Stella Kuzmenko, Matilda Biba, Daniel Ian Flitcroft
{"title":"治疗进行性近视会使眼科护理人员不堪重负吗?劳动力模型研究。","authors":"Gareth Lingham,&nbsp;James Loughman,&nbsp;Stella Kuzmenko,&nbsp;Matilda Biba,&nbsp;Daniel Ian Flitcroft","doi":"10.1111/opo.13019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Treatments for myopia progression are now available, but implementing these into clinical practice will place a burden on the eye care workforce. This study estimated the full-time equivalent (FTE) workforce required to implement myopia control treatments in the UK and Ireland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To estimate the number of 6- to 21-year-olds with myopia, two models utilising separate data sources were developed. The examination-based model used: (1) the number of primary care eye examinations conducted annually and (2) the proportion of these that are for myopic young people. The prevalence-based model used epidemiological data on the age-specific prevalence of myopia. The proportion of myopic young people progressing ≥0.25 dioptres (D)/year or ≥0.50 D/year was obtained from Irish electronic health records and the recommended review schedule from clinical management guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the examination and prevalence models, respectively, the estimated number of young people with myopia was 2,469,943 and 2,235,713. The extra workforce required to provide comprehensive myopia management for this target population was estimated at 226-317 FTE at the 0.50 D/year threshold and 433-630 FTE at the 0.25 D/year threshold. Extra visits required for myopia control treatment represented approximately 2.6% of current primary eye care examinations versus 13.6% of hospital examinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing new myopia control treatments in primary care settings over the medium-term is unlikely to overwhelm the eye care workforce completely. Further increases to workforce, upskilling of current workforce and tools to reduce chair time will help to ensure sustainability of the eye care workforce into the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":520731,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","volume":" ","pages":"1092-1102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/25/OPO-42-1092.PMC9543528.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Will treating progressive myopia overwhelm the eye care workforce? A workforce modelling study.\",\"authors\":\"Gareth Lingham,&nbsp;James Loughman,&nbsp;Stella Kuzmenko,&nbsp;Matilda Biba,&nbsp;Daniel Ian Flitcroft\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/opo.13019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Treatments for myopia progression are now available, but implementing these into clinical practice will place a burden on the eye care workforce. This study estimated the full-time equivalent (FTE) workforce required to implement myopia control treatments in the UK and Ireland.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To estimate the number of 6- to 21-year-olds with myopia, two models utilising separate data sources were developed. The examination-based model used: (1) the number of primary care eye examinations conducted annually and (2) the proportion of these that are for myopic young people. The prevalence-based model used epidemiological data on the age-specific prevalence of myopia. The proportion of myopic young people progressing ≥0.25 dioptres (D)/year or ≥0.50 D/year was obtained from Irish electronic health records and the recommended review schedule from clinical management guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the examination and prevalence models, respectively, the estimated number of young people with myopia was 2,469,943 and 2,235,713. The extra workforce required to provide comprehensive myopia management for this target population was estimated at 226-317 FTE at the 0.50 D/year threshold and 433-630 FTE at the 0.25 D/year threshold. Extra visits required for myopia control treatment represented approximately 2.6% of current primary eye care examinations versus 13.6% of hospital examinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing new myopia control treatments in primary care settings over the medium-term is unlikely to overwhelm the eye care workforce completely. Further increases to workforce, upskilling of current workforce and tools to reduce chair time will help to ensure sustainability of the eye care workforce into the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1092-1102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/25/OPO-42-1092.PMC9543528.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:近视进展的治疗方法现在是可用的,但是在临床实践中实施这些方法会给眼科护理人员带来负担。这项研究估计了在英国和爱尔兰实施近视控制治疗所需的全职等效劳动力(FTE)。方法:为了估计6- 21岁近视人群的数量,我们利用不同的数据来源建立了两个模型。基于检查的模型使用:(1)每年进行的初级保健眼科检查次数和(2)这些检查中针对近视年轻人的比例。基于患病率的模型使用了特定年龄段近视患病率的流行病学数据。近视年轻人进展≥0.25屈光度(D)/年或≥0.50 D/年的比例从爱尔兰电子健康记录和临床管理指南推荐的审查时间表中获得。结果:使用检查模型和患病率模型,估计青少年近视人数分别为2,469,943人和2,235,713人。据估计,为这一目标人群提供全面近视治疗所需的额外劳动力为226-317名FTE (0.50 D/年阈值)和433-630名FTE (0.25 D/年阈值)。近视控制治疗所需的额外就诊约占目前初级眼科检查的2.6%,而医院检查占13.6%。结论:中期在初级保健机构实施新的近视控制治疗不太可能完全压倒眼科护理人员。进一步增加劳动力,提高现有劳动力的技能,并使用工具减少坐在椅子上的时间,将有助于确保眼科护理人员在未来的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Will treating progressive myopia overwhelm the eye care workforce? A workforce modelling study.

Will treating progressive myopia overwhelm the eye care workforce? A workforce modelling study.

Will treating progressive myopia overwhelm the eye care workforce? A workforce modelling study.

Will treating progressive myopia overwhelm the eye care workforce? A workforce modelling study.

Purpose: Treatments for myopia progression are now available, but implementing these into clinical practice will place a burden on the eye care workforce. This study estimated the full-time equivalent (FTE) workforce required to implement myopia control treatments in the UK and Ireland.

Methods: To estimate the number of 6- to 21-year-olds with myopia, two models utilising separate data sources were developed. The examination-based model used: (1) the number of primary care eye examinations conducted annually and (2) the proportion of these that are for myopic young people. The prevalence-based model used epidemiological data on the age-specific prevalence of myopia. The proportion of myopic young people progressing ≥0.25 dioptres (D)/year or ≥0.50 D/year was obtained from Irish electronic health records and the recommended review schedule from clinical management guidelines.

Results: Using the examination and prevalence models, respectively, the estimated number of young people with myopia was 2,469,943 and 2,235,713. The extra workforce required to provide comprehensive myopia management for this target population was estimated at 226-317 FTE at the 0.50 D/year threshold and 433-630 FTE at the 0.25 D/year threshold. Extra visits required for myopia control treatment represented approximately 2.6% of current primary eye care examinations versus 13.6% of hospital examinations.

Conclusions: Implementing new myopia control treatments in primary care settings over the medium-term is unlikely to overwhelm the eye care workforce completely. Further increases to workforce, upskilling of current workforce and tools to reduce chair time will help to ensure sustainability of the eye care workforce into the future.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信