经皮宫颈和经腹超声检查作为儿童胃食管反流的诊断工具。

IF 1.3
Bilge Karabulut, Ilknur Bostanci, Mahmut Kacar, Gokhan Karaca, Pinar Kosar
{"title":"经皮宫颈和经腹超声检查作为儿童胃食管反流的诊断工具。","authors":"Bilge Karabulut,&nbsp;Ilknur Bostanci,&nbsp;Mahmut Kacar,&nbsp;Gokhan Karaca,&nbsp;Pinar Kosar","doi":"10.1159/000319900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The aim of this study is to investigate if there is a diagnostic expressive difference in the angle of His, upper and lower esophageal diameter (UED and LED), wall thickness of cervical esophagus (WTCE) measured by cervical and transabdominal ultrasonography (USG) between children with (+) and without gastroesophageal reflux (GER-).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>50 children were separated into 2 groups. Group 1 was the control group (n = 30) consisting of children who had no symptoms of GER and had no GER detected in USG. Group 2 was the study group (n = 20) consisting of children with complaints related to GER, and who were GER+ by USG and esophageal pH monitoring. The USG examinations were completed after having observed 3 episodes of reflux or after 30 min if no reflux was detected. The angle of His, UED, LED and WTCE were measured. In 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, acid contact to the proximal or distal probe greater than 5.0% of the total time below pH 4 was accepted as pathologic reflux.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age range of the 50 children (30 boys) was 4-13 years. Between the 2 groups there were no differences with regard to age and gender. Values of UED, LED and WTCE were statistically higher in group 2 compared with group 1. The angle of His was higher in the control group, but this was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study is the first in the literature that shows that measuring UED, LED and WTCE by USG, which is a noninvasive, readily available repeatable, cheap and fast technique, has a high diagnostic value in children with suspected GER.</p>","PeriodicalId":520736,"journal":{"name":"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties","volume":" ","pages":"300-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000319900","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcutaneous cervical and transabdominal ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool in gastroesophageal reflux in childhood.\",\"authors\":\"Bilge Karabulut,&nbsp;Ilknur Bostanci,&nbsp;Mahmut Kacar,&nbsp;Gokhan Karaca,&nbsp;Pinar Kosar\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000319900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The aim of this study is to investigate if there is a diagnostic expressive difference in the angle of His, upper and lower esophageal diameter (UED and LED), wall thickness of cervical esophagus (WTCE) measured by cervical and transabdominal ultrasonography (USG) between children with (+) and without gastroesophageal reflux (GER-).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>50 children were separated into 2 groups. Group 1 was the control group (n = 30) consisting of children who had no symptoms of GER and had no GER detected in USG. Group 2 was the study group (n = 20) consisting of children with complaints related to GER, and who were GER+ by USG and esophageal pH monitoring. The USG examinations were completed after having observed 3 episodes of reflux or after 30 min if no reflux was detected. The angle of His, UED, LED and WTCE were measured. In 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, acid contact to the proximal or distal probe greater than 5.0% of the total time below pH 4 was accepted as pathologic reflux.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age range of the 50 children (30 boys) was 4-13 years. Between the 2 groups there were no differences with regard to age and gender. Values of UED, LED and WTCE were statistically higher in group 2 compared with group 1. The angle of His was higher in the control group, but this was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study is the first in the literature that shows that measuring UED, LED and WTCE by USG, which is a noninvasive, readily available repeatable, cheap and fast technique, has a high diagnostic value in children with suspected GER.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"300-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000319900\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000319900\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2010/9/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000319900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/9/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

背景/目的:本研究的目的是探讨胃食管反流(GER-)患儿(+)与非(+)患儿的His角度、食管上、下径(UED和LED)、颈段超声及经腹超声(USG)测量的食管壁厚(WTCE)是否有诊断性差异。方法:50例患儿分为两组。第1组为对照组(n = 30),由无GER症状且USG未检测到GER的儿童组成。第2组为研究组(n = 20),由与GER相关的主诉儿童组成,USG和食管pH监测均为GER+。USG检查在观察到3次反流发作后完成,如果未检测到反流,则在30分钟后完成。测量了His、UED、LED和WTCE的角度。在24小时食管pH监测中,酸接触近端或远端探头的时间低于pH 4的总时间超过5.0%被认为是病理性反流。结果:50例患儿(男30例)年龄4 ~ 13岁。两组之间在年龄和性别方面没有差异。2组UED、LED、WTCE值均高于1组,差异有统计学意义。对照组His的角度较高,但无统计学意义。结论:我们的研究在文献中首次显示USG测量UED、LED和WTCE,是一种无创、容易获得、可重复、廉价、快速的技术,对疑似GER患儿具有较高的诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcutaneous cervical and transabdominal ultrasonography as a diagnostic tool in gastroesophageal reflux in childhood.

Background/aim: The aim of this study is to investigate if there is a diagnostic expressive difference in the angle of His, upper and lower esophageal diameter (UED and LED), wall thickness of cervical esophagus (WTCE) measured by cervical and transabdominal ultrasonography (USG) between children with (+) and without gastroesophageal reflux (GER-).

Methods: 50 children were separated into 2 groups. Group 1 was the control group (n = 30) consisting of children who had no symptoms of GER and had no GER detected in USG. Group 2 was the study group (n = 20) consisting of children with complaints related to GER, and who were GER+ by USG and esophageal pH monitoring. The USG examinations were completed after having observed 3 episodes of reflux or after 30 min if no reflux was detected. The angle of His, UED, LED and WTCE were measured. In 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, acid contact to the proximal or distal probe greater than 5.0% of the total time below pH 4 was accepted as pathologic reflux.

Results: The age range of the 50 children (30 boys) was 4-13 years. Between the 2 groups there were no differences with regard to age and gender. Values of UED, LED and WTCE were statistically higher in group 2 compared with group 1. The angle of His was higher in the control group, but this was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Our study is the first in the literature that shows that measuring UED, LED and WTCE by USG, which is a noninvasive, readily available repeatable, cheap and fast technique, has a high diagnostic value in children with suspected GER.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信