在体外和体内系统中对瘤胃厌氧真菌种群进行相对量化的定量竞争性PCR检测的开发和使用

Mohammad H. Sekhavati , Mohsen Danesh Mesgaran , Mohammad R. Nassiri , Tahereh Mohammadabadi , Farkhondeh Rezaii , Adham Fani Maleki
{"title":"在体外和体内系统中对瘤胃厌氧真菌种群进行相对量化的定量竞争性PCR检测的开发和使用","authors":"Mohammad H. Sekhavati ,&nbsp;Mohsen Danesh Mesgaran ,&nbsp;Mohammad R. Nassiri ,&nbsp;Tahereh Mohammadabadi ,&nbsp;Farkhondeh Rezaii ,&nbsp;Adham Fani Maleki","doi":"10.1016/j.mycres.2009.07.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper describes the use of a quantitative competitive polymerase chain reaction (QC-PCR) assay; using PCR primers to the rRNA locus of rumen fungi and a standard-control DNA including design and validation. In order to test the efficiency of this method for quantifying anaerobic rumen fungi, it has been attempted to evaluate this method in <em>in vitro</em> conditions by comparing with an assay based on measuring cell wall chitin. The changes in fungal growth have been studied when they are grown in <em>in vitro</em> on either untreated (US) or sodium hydroxide treated wheat straw (TS). Results showed that rumen fungi growth was significantly higher in treated samples compared with untreated during the 12<!--> <!-->d incubation (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) and plotting the chitin assay's results against the competitive PCR's showed high positive correlation (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->0.87). The low mean values of the coefficients of variance in repeatability in the QC-PCR method against the chitin assay demonstrated more reliability of this new approach. And finally, the efficiency of this method was investigated in <em>in vivo</em> conditions. Samples of rumen fluid were collected from four fistulated Holstein steers which were fed four different diets (basal diet, high starch, high sucrose and starch plus sucrose) in rotation. The results of QC-PCR showed that addition of these non-structural carbohydrates to the basal diets caused a significant decrease in rumen anaerobic fungi biomass. The QC-PCR method appears to be a reliable and can be used for rumen samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19045,"journal":{"name":"Mycological research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mycres.2009.07.017","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and use of quantitative competitive PCR assays for relative quantifying rumen anaerobic fungal populations in both in vitro and in vivo systems\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad H. Sekhavati ,&nbsp;Mohsen Danesh Mesgaran ,&nbsp;Mohammad R. Nassiri ,&nbsp;Tahereh Mohammadabadi ,&nbsp;Farkhondeh Rezaii ,&nbsp;Adham Fani Maleki\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mycres.2009.07.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper describes the use of a quantitative competitive polymerase chain reaction (QC-PCR) assay; using PCR primers to the rRNA locus of rumen fungi and a standard-control DNA including design and validation. In order to test the efficiency of this method for quantifying anaerobic rumen fungi, it has been attempted to evaluate this method in <em>in vitro</em> conditions by comparing with an assay based on measuring cell wall chitin. The changes in fungal growth have been studied when they are grown in <em>in vitro</em> on either untreated (US) or sodium hydroxide treated wheat straw (TS). Results showed that rumen fungi growth was significantly higher in treated samples compared with untreated during the 12<!--> <!-->d incubation (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.05) and plotting the chitin assay's results against the competitive PCR's showed high positive correlation (<em>R</em><sup>2</sup> <!-->≥<!--> <!-->0.87). The low mean values of the coefficients of variance in repeatability in the QC-PCR method against the chitin assay demonstrated more reliability of this new approach. And finally, the efficiency of this method was investigated in <em>in vivo</em> conditions. Samples of rumen fluid were collected from four fistulated Holstein steers which were fed four different diets (basal diet, high starch, high sucrose and starch plus sucrose) in rotation. The results of QC-PCR showed that addition of these non-structural carbohydrates to the basal diets caused a significant decrease in rumen anaerobic fungi biomass. The QC-PCR method appears to be a reliable and can be used for rumen samples.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mycological research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mycres.2009.07.017\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mycological research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953756209001336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycological research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953756209001336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

本文介绍了定量竞争性聚合酶链反应(QC-PCR)测定的使用;利用PCR引物对瘤胃真菌的rRNA位点和标准对照DNA进行设计和验证。为了检验该方法定量瘤胃厌氧真菌的有效性,我们尝试在体外条件下,通过与细胞壁甲壳素测定法进行比较,对该方法进行评价。当真菌在未经处理(US)或氢氧化钠处理的麦秸(TS)上体外生长时,研究了真菌生长的变化。结果表明,在12 d的培养过程中,处理样品的瘤胃真菌生长显著高于未处理样品(P <0.05),几丁质测定结果与竞争性PCR结果呈高度正相关(R2≥0.87)。与几丁质分析相比,QC-PCR方法重复性方差系数平均值较低,表明该方法具有较高的可靠性。最后,在体内条件下考察了该方法的有效性。选取4头有瘘管的荷斯坦阉牛,轮流饲喂基础饲粮、高淀粉饲粮、高蔗糖饲粮和淀粉加蔗糖饲粮。QC-PCR结果表明,在基础饲粮中添加这些非结构性碳水化合物可显著降低瘤胃厌氧真菌生物量。QC-PCR方法可靠,可用于瘤胃样品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and use of quantitative competitive PCR assays for relative quantifying rumen anaerobic fungal populations in both in vitro and in vivo systems

This paper describes the use of a quantitative competitive polymerase chain reaction (QC-PCR) assay; using PCR primers to the rRNA locus of rumen fungi and a standard-control DNA including design and validation. In order to test the efficiency of this method for quantifying anaerobic rumen fungi, it has been attempted to evaluate this method in in vitro conditions by comparing with an assay based on measuring cell wall chitin. The changes in fungal growth have been studied when they are grown in in vitro on either untreated (US) or sodium hydroxide treated wheat straw (TS). Results showed that rumen fungi growth was significantly higher in treated samples compared with untreated during the 12 d incubation (P < 0.05) and plotting the chitin assay's results against the competitive PCR's showed high positive correlation (R2  0.87). The low mean values of the coefficients of variance in repeatability in the QC-PCR method against the chitin assay demonstrated more reliability of this new approach. And finally, the efficiency of this method was investigated in in vivo conditions. Samples of rumen fluid were collected from four fistulated Holstein steers which were fed four different diets (basal diet, high starch, high sucrose and starch plus sucrose) in rotation. The results of QC-PCR showed that addition of these non-structural carbohydrates to the basal diets caused a significant decrease in rumen anaerobic fungi biomass. The QC-PCR method appears to be a reliable and can be used for rumen samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信