在复发或难治性大b细胞淋巴瘤(TRANSFORM)患者中,Lisocabtagene maraleucel与标准护理与补救性化疗后自体干细胞移植作为二线治疗:一项开放标签、随机化、3期试验的中期分析结果。

IF 2.7 3区 化学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Manali Kamdar, Scott R Solomon, Jon Arnason, Patrick B Johnston, Bertram Glass, Veronika Bachanova, Sami Ibrahimi, Stephan Mielke, Pim Mutsaers, Francisco Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, Koji Izutsu, Franck Morschhauser, Matthew Lunning, David G Maloney, Alessandro Crotta, Sandrine Montheard, Alessandro Previtali, Lara Stepan, Ken Ogasawara, Timothy Mack, Jeremy S Abramson
{"title":"在复发或难治性大b细胞淋巴瘤(TRANSFORM)患者中,Lisocabtagene maraleucel与标准护理与补救性化疗后自体干细胞移植作为二线治疗:一项开放标签、随机化、3期试验的中期分析结果。","authors":"Manali Kamdar,&nbsp;Scott R Solomon,&nbsp;Jon Arnason,&nbsp;Patrick B Johnston,&nbsp;Bertram Glass,&nbsp;Veronika Bachanova,&nbsp;Sami Ibrahimi,&nbsp;Stephan Mielke,&nbsp;Pim Mutsaers,&nbsp;Francisco Hernandez-Ilizaliturri,&nbsp;Koji Izutsu,&nbsp;Franck Morschhauser,&nbsp;Matthew Lunning,&nbsp;David G Maloney,&nbsp;Alessandro Crotta,&nbsp;Sandrine Montheard,&nbsp;Alessandro Previtali,&nbsp;Lara Stepan,&nbsp;Ken Ogasawara,&nbsp;Timothy Mack,&nbsp;Jeremy S Abramson","doi":"10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00662-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) primary refractory to or relapsed within 12 months of first-line therapy are at high risk for poor outcomes with current standard of care, platinum-based salvage immunochemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), an autologous, CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, has previously demonstrated efficacy and manageable safety in third-line or later LBCL. In this Article, we report a prespecified interim analysis of liso-cel versus standard of care as second-line treatment for primary refractory or early relapsed (within 12 months after response to initial therapy) LBCL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TRANSFORM is a global, phase 3 study, conducted in 47 sites in the USA, Europe, and Japan, comparing liso-cel with standard of care as second-line therapy in patients with primary refractory or early (≤12 months) relapsed LBCL. Adults aged 18-75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 1 or less, adequate organ function, PET-positive disease per Lugano 2014 criteria, and candidates for autologous HSCT were randomly assigned (1:1), by use of interactive response technology, to liso-cel (100 × 10<sup>6</sup> CAR<sup>+</sup> T cells intravenously) or standard of care. Standard of care consisted of three cycles of salvage immunochemotherapy delivered intravenously-R-DHAP (rituximab 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, two infusions of cytarabine 2000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 2, and cisplatin 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1), R-ICE (rituximab 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1, ifosfamide 5000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 2, etoposide 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1-3, and carboplatin area under the curve 5 [maximum dose of 800 mg] on day 2), or R-GDP (rituximab 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1)-followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT in responders. Primary endpoint was event-free survival, with response assessments by an independent review committee per Lugano 2014 criteria. Efficacy was assessed per intention-to-treat (ie, all randomly assigned patients) and safety in patients who received any treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03575351, and is ongoing.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Oct 23, 2018, and Dec 8, 2020, 232 patients were screened and 184 were assigned to the liso-cel (n=92) or standard of care (n=92) groups. At the data cutoff for this interim analysis, March 8, 2021, the median follow-up was 6·2 months (IQR 4·4-11·5). Median event-free survival was significantly improved in the liso-cel group (10·1 months [95% CI 6·1-not reached]) compared with the standard-of-care group (2·3 months [2·2-4·3]; stratified hazard ratio 0·35; 95% CI 0·23-0·53; stratified Cox proportional hazards model one-sided p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (74 [80%] of 92 patients in the liso-cel group vs 46 [51%] of 91 patients in the standard-of-care group), anaemia (45 [49%] vs 45 [49%]), thrombocytopenia (45 [49%] vs 58 [64%]), and prolonged cytopenia (40 [43%] vs three [3%]). Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events, which are associated with CAR T-cell therapy, occurred in one (1%) and four (4%) of 92 patients in the liso-cel group, respectively (no grade 4 or 5 events). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 44 (48%) patients in the liso-cel group and 44 (48%) in the standard-of-care group. No new liso-cel safety concerns were identified in the second-line setting. There were no treatment-related deaths in the liso-cel group and one treatment-related death due to sepsis in the standard-of-care group.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>These results support liso-cel as a new second-line treatment recommendation in patients with early relapsed or refractory LBCL.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.</p>","PeriodicalId":98,"journal":{"name":"Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"2294-2308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"144","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lisocabtagene maraleucel versus standard of care with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as second-line treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (TRANSFORM): results from an interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.\",\"authors\":\"Manali Kamdar,&nbsp;Scott R Solomon,&nbsp;Jon Arnason,&nbsp;Patrick B Johnston,&nbsp;Bertram Glass,&nbsp;Veronika Bachanova,&nbsp;Sami Ibrahimi,&nbsp;Stephan Mielke,&nbsp;Pim Mutsaers,&nbsp;Francisco Hernandez-Ilizaliturri,&nbsp;Koji Izutsu,&nbsp;Franck Morschhauser,&nbsp;Matthew Lunning,&nbsp;David G Maloney,&nbsp;Alessandro Crotta,&nbsp;Sandrine Montheard,&nbsp;Alessandro Previtali,&nbsp;Lara Stepan,&nbsp;Ken Ogasawara,&nbsp;Timothy Mack,&nbsp;Jeremy S Abramson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00662-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) primary refractory to or relapsed within 12 months of first-line therapy are at high risk for poor outcomes with current standard of care, platinum-based salvage immunochemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), an autologous, CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, has previously demonstrated efficacy and manageable safety in third-line or later LBCL. In this Article, we report a prespecified interim analysis of liso-cel versus standard of care as second-line treatment for primary refractory or early relapsed (within 12 months after response to initial therapy) LBCL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>TRANSFORM is a global, phase 3 study, conducted in 47 sites in the USA, Europe, and Japan, comparing liso-cel with standard of care as second-line therapy in patients with primary refractory or early (≤12 months) relapsed LBCL. Adults aged 18-75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 1 or less, adequate organ function, PET-positive disease per Lugano 2014 criteria, and candidates for autologous HSCT were randomly assigned (1:1), by use of interactive response technology, to liso-cel (100 × 10<sup>6</sup> CAR<sup>+</sup> T cells intravenously) or standard of care. Standard of care consisted of three cycles of salvage immunochemotherapy delivered intravenously-R-DHAP (rituximab 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, two infusions of cytarabine 2000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 2, and cisplatin 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1), R-ICE (rituximab 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1, ifosfamide 5000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 2, etoposide 100 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1-3, and carboplatin area under the curve 5 [maximum dose of 800 mg] on day 2), or R-GDP (rituximab 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 75 mg/m<sup>2</sup> on day 1)-followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT in responders. Primary endpoint was event-free survival, with response assessments by an independent review committee per Lugano 2014 criteria. Efficacy was assessed per intention-to-treat (ie, all randomly assigned patients) and safety in patients who received any treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03575351, and is ongoing.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Oct 23, 2018, and Dec 8, 2020, 232 patients were screened and 184 were assigned to the liso-cel (n=92) or standard of care (n=92) groups. At the data cutoff for this interim analysis, March 8, 2021, the median follow-up was 6·2 months (IQR 4·4-11·5). Median event-free survival was significantly improved in the liso-cel group (10·1 months [95% CI 6·1-not reached]) compared with the standard-of-care group (2·3 months [2·2-4·3]; stratified hazard ratio 0·35; 95% CI 0·23-0·53; stratified Cox proportional hazards model one-sided p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (74 [80%] of 92 patients in the liso-cel group vs 46 [51%] of 91 patients in the standard-of-care group), anaemia (45 [49%] vs 45 [49%]), thrombocytopenia (45 [49%] vs 58 [64%]), and prolonged cytopenia (40 [43%] vs three [3%]). Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events, which are associated with CAR T-cell therapy, occurred in one (1%) and four (4%) of 92 patients in the liso-cel group, respectively (no grade 4 or 5 events). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 44 (48%) patients in the liso-cel group and 44 (48%) in the standard-of-care group. No new liso-cel safety concerns were identified in the second-line setting. There were no treatment-related deaths in the liso-cel group and one treatment-related death due to sepsis in the standard-of-care group.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>These results support liso-cel as a new second-line treatment recommendation in patients with early relapsed or refractory LBCL.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":98,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2294-2308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"144\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00662-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00662-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 144

摘要

背景:大b细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)原发性难治性或在一线治疗12个月内复发的患者,采用目前的护理标准、铂基补救性免疫化疗和自体造血干细胞移植(HSCT),预后不良的风险很高。Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso- cell)是一种自体cd19定向嵌合抗原受体(CAR) t细胞疗法,先前已证明用于三线或晚期LBCL的有效性和可管理的安全性。在这篇文章中,我们报告了一项预先指定的中期分析,将liso- cell与标准护理作为原发性难治性或早期复发(对初始治疗有反应后12个月内)LBCL的二线治疗。方法:TRANSFORM是一项全球性的3期研究,在美国、欧洲和日本的47个地点进行,比较lso -cel与标准护理作为原发性难治性或早期(≤12个月)复发LBCL患者的二线治疗。年龄在18-75岁、东部肿瘤合作组织(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group)表现状态评分为1分或更低、器官功能正常、Lugano 2014标准pet阳性疾病和自体HSCT候选者被随机分配(1:1),通过使用互动反应技术,分配到liso-cel(静脉注射100 × 106 CAR+ T细胞)或标准护理组。标准包括三个救助immunochemotherapy intravenously-R-DHAP交付周期(美罗华375 mg / m2 1天,地塞米松40毫克1 - 4天,两种注入阿糖胞苷2000 mg / m2 2天,第一天,顺铂100 mg / m2), R-ICE(美罗华375 mg / m2 1天,2天异环磷酰胺5000 mg / m2,依托泊苷100 mg / m2在1 - 3天,和卡铂曲线下面积5天(最大剂量800毫克)2),或R-GDP(美罗华375 mg / m2 1天,地塞米松40mg(第1-4天),吉西他滨1000mg /m2(第1天和第8天),顺铂75mg /m2(第1天)-应答者随后进行大剂量化疗和自体造血干细胞移植。主要终点为无事件生存期,由独立审查委员会根据Lugano 2014标准进行反应评估。根据意向治疗(即所有随机分配的患者)和接受任何治疗的患者的安全性评估疗效。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT03575351,并正在进行中。在2018年10月23日至2020年12月8日期间,对232名患者进行了筛查,其中184名患者被分配到liso- cell组(n=92)或标准治疗组(n=92)。在此中期分析的数据截止日期为2021年3月8日,中位随访时间为6.2个月(IQR 4.4 - 11.5)。与标准治疗组(2·3个月[2·4 - 3])相比,liso- cell组(10·1个月[95% CI 6.1 -未达到])的中位无事件生存期显著提高;分层风险比0·35;95% ci 0.23 - 0.53;解释:这些结果支持liso- cell作为早期复发或难治性LBCL患者的新的二线治疗推荐。融资:百时美施贵宝公司旗下的Celgene公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lisocabtagene maraleucel versus standard of care with salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as second-line treatment in patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (TRANSFORM): results from an interim analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

Background: Patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) primary refractory to or relapsed within 12 months of first-line therapy are at high risk for poor outcomes with current standard of care, platinum-based salvage immunochemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), an autologous, CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, has previously demonstrated efficacy and manageable safety in third-line or later LBCL. In this Article, we report a prespecified interim analysis of liso-cel versus standard of care as second-line treatment for primary refractory or early relapsed (within 12 months after response to initial therapy) LBCL.

Methods: TRANSFORM is a global, phase 3 study, conducted in 47 sites in the USA, Europe, and Japan, comparing liso-cel with standard of care as second-line therapy in patients with primary refractory or early (≤12 months) relapsed LBCL. Adults aged 18-75 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 1 or less, adequate organ function, PET-positive disease per Lugano 2014 criteria, and candidates for autologous HSCT were randomly assigned (1:1), by use of interactive response technology, to liso-cel (100 × 106 CAR+ T cells intravenously) or standard of care. Standard of care consisted of three cycles of salvage immunochemotherapy delivered intravenously-R-DHAP (rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, two infusions of cytarabine 2000 mg/m2 on day 2, and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1), R-ICE (rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1, ifosfamide 5000 mg/m2 on day 2, etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1-3, and carboplatin area under the curve 5 [maximum dose of 800 mg] on day 2), or R-GDP (rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1, dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1)-followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT in responders. Primary endpoint was event-free survival, with response assessments by an independent review committee per Lugano 2014 criteria. Efficacy was assessed per intention-to-treat (ie, all randomly assigned patients) and safety in patients who received any treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03575351, and is ongoing.

Findings: Between Oct 23, 2018, and Dec 8, 2020, 232 patients were screened and 184 were assigned to the liso-cel (n=92) or standard of care (n=92) groups. At the data cutoff for this interim analysis, March 8, 2021, the median follow-up was 6·2 months (IQR 4·4-11·5). Median event-free survival was significantly improved in the liso-cel group (10·1 months [95% CI 6·1-not reached]) compared with the standard-of-care group (2·3 months [2·2-4·3]; stratified hazard ratio 0·35; 95% CI 0·23-0·53; stratified Cox proportional hazards model one-sided p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (74 [80%] of 92 patients in the liso-cel group vs 46 [51%] of 91 patients in the standard-of-care group), anaemia (45 [49%] vs 45 [49%]), thrombocytopenia (45 [49%] vs 58 [64%]), and prolonged cytopenia (40 [43%] vs three [3%]). Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events, which are associated with CAR T-cell therapy, occurred in one (1%) and four (4%) of 92 patients in the liso-cel group, respectively (no grade 4 or 5 events). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 44 (48%) patients in the liso-cel group and 44 (48%) in the standard-of-care group. No new liso-cel safety concerns were identified in the second-line setting. There were no treatment-related deaths in the liso-cel group and one treatment-related death due to sepsis in the standard-of-care group.

Interpretation: These results support liso-cel as a new second-line treatment recommendation in patients with early relapsed or refractory LBCL.

Funding: Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
201
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: A society-owned journal publishing high quality research on all aspects of photochemistry and photobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信