德国儿童疼痛灾难化量表(PCS-C) -构式的心理测量分析与评价。

Psycho-social medicine Pub Date : 2013-08-02 Print Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.3205/psm000097
Birgit Kröner-Herwig, Jennifer Maas
{"title":"德国儿童疼痛灾难化量表(PCS-C) -构式的心理测量分析与评价。","authors":"Birgit Kröner-Herwig,&nbsp;Jennifer Maas","doi":"10.3205/psm000097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, adapted for children (PCS-C) by Crombez et al. (2003), was translated into German (SKS-D) and evaluated regarding its factorial structure, its reliability and validity. The association of catastrophizing with various pain characteristics and disability measures was examined as well as its association to neighboring constructs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The paper-and-pencil version of the SKS-D was used in two different samples of children and adolescents. Analyses were conducted on a subgroup of participants from an epidemiological sample [n=898; age: M=12.9 (SD=1.4)] who had experienced monthly headaches in the 6-months period before and a clinical sample [n=60; age: M=12.6 (SD=0.8)] seeking treatment for recurrent headaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis (PCA) suggested a one-factor model in contrast to the 3-factor model suggested by Crombez et al. (2003). The unidimensional scale showed distinct homogeneity and satisfying reliability. The clinical sample showed significantly higher scores than the epidemiological group. Also girls scored higher than boys. The catastrophizing explained a considerable amount of variance in pain and disability parameters in both samples thus underlining its validity. The psychological variables internalising, anxiety sensitivity and somatosensory amplification showed significant small to moderate associations with pain catastrophizing and also with pain and disability. After controlling for the above mentioned psychological variables, catastrophizing still yielded an independent contribution to the explanation of variance in pain and disability parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PCS-C in its German form is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing catastrophizing in children with recurrent pain, in particular headache, in the age of 10-16 years. Pain catastrophizing is suggested to be assessed especially in pediatric pain patients as it is a significant moderator of pain and disability. In children with a distinct tendency to catastrophize cognitive restructuring should become a target of pediatric pain therapy, as a reduction of catastrophizing cognitions may indirectly help to ameliorate pain and disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":88305,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-social medicine","volume":" ","pages":"Doc07"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/psm000097","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The German Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS-C) - psychometric analysis and evaluation of the construct.\",\"authors\":\"Birgit Kröner-Herwig,&nbsp;Jennifer Maas\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/psm000097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, adapted for children (PCS-C) by Crombez et al. (2003), was translated into German (SKS-D) and evaluated regarding its factorial structure, its reliability and validity. The association of catastrophizing with various pain characteristics and disability measures was examined as well as its association to neighboring constructs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The paper-and-pencil version of the SKS-D was used in two different samples of children and adolescents. Analyses were conducted on a subgroup of participants from an epidemiological sample [n=898; age: M=12.9 (SD=1.4)] who had experienced monthly headaches in the 6-months period before and a clinical sample [n=60; age: M=12.6 (SD=0.8)] seeking treatment for recurrent headaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploratory factor analysis (PCA) suggested a one-factor model in contrast to the 3-factor model suggested by Crombez et al. (2003). The unidimensional scale showed distinct homogeneity and satisfying reliability. The clinical sample showed significantly higher scores than the epidemiological group. Also girls scored higher than boys. The catastrophizing explained a considerable amount of variance in pain and disability parameters in both samples thus underlining its validity. The psychological variables internalising, anxiety sensitivity and somatosensory amplification showed significant small to moderate associations with pain catastrophizing and also with pain and disability. After controlling for the above mentioned psychological variables, catastrophizing still yielded an independent contribution to the explanation of variance in pain and disability parameters.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PCS-C in its German form is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing catastrophizing in children with recurrent pain, in particular headache, in the age of 10-16 years. Pain catastrophizing is suggested to be assessed especially in pediatric pain patients as it is a significant moderator of pain and disability. In children with a distinct tendency to catastrophize cognitive restructuring should become a target of pediatric pain therapy, as a reduction of catastrophizing cognitions may indirectly help to ameliorate pain and disability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho-social medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"Doc07\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/psm000097\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho-social medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/psm000097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-social medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/psm000097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

目的:将Crombez等人(2003)编写的儿童疼痛灾难化量表(PCS-C)翻译成德文量表(SKS-D),并对其析因结构、信度和效度进行评估。灾难化与各种疼痛特征和残疾措施的关联,以及其与邻近构象的关联进行了研究。方法:采用纸笔版的SKS-D对两种不同的儿童和青少年样本进行测试。对来自流行病学样本的一个亚组参与者进行分析[n=898;年龄:M=12.9 (SD=1.4)],在此之前的6个月期间有每月头痛的患者和临床样本[n=60;年龄:M=12.6 (SD=0.8)]因复发性头痛寻求治疗。结果:与Crombez et al.(2003)提出的三因素模型相比,探索性因子分析(Exploratory factor analysis, PCA)建议采用单因素模型。单维量表具有明显的同质性和良好的信度。临床样本得分明显高于流行病学组。此外,女孩的得分也高于男孩。灾难化解释了两个样本中疼痛和残疾参数的相当大的差异,从而强调了其有效性。心理变量内化、焦虑敏感性和体感放大与疼痛灾难化以及疼痛和残疾有显著的小到中度的关联。在控制了上述心理变量后,灾难化仍然对疼痛和残疾参数的差异产生了独立的解释。结论:德文形式的PCS-C是评估10-16岁复发性疼痛,特别是头痛的儿童灾难化的有效和可靠的工具。建议评估疼痛灾难化,特别是在儿童疼痛患者中,因为它是疼痛和残疾的重要调节因素。在具有明显的认知灾难化重构倾向的儿童中,应成为儿童疼痛治疗的目标,因为减少认知灾难化可能间接有助于改善疼痛和残疾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The German Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS-C) - psychometric analysis and evaluation of the construct.

The German Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS-C) - psychometric analysis and evaluation of the construct.

The German Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS-C) - psychometric analysis and evaluation of the construct.

The German Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS-C) - psychometric analysis and evaluation of the construct.

Objective: The Pain Catastrophizing Scale, adapted for children (PCS-C) by Crombez et al. (2003), was translated into German (SKS-D) and evaluated regarding its factorial structure, its reliability and validity. The association of catastrophizing with various pain characteristics and disability measures was examined as well as its association to neighboring constructs.

Method: The paper-and-pencil version of the SKS-D was used in two different samples of children and adolescents. Analyses were conducted on a subgroup of participants from an epidemiological sample [n=898; age: M=12.9 (SD=1.4)] who had experienced monthly headaches in the 6-months period before and a clinical sample [n=60; age: M=12.6 (SD=0.8)] seeking treatment for recurrent headaches.

Results: Exploratory factor analysis (PCA) suggested a one-factor model in contrast to the 3-factor model suggested by Crombez et al. (2003). The unidimensional scale showed distinct homogeneity and satisfying reliability. The clinical sample showed significantly higher scores than the epidemiological group. Also girls scored higher than boys. The catastrophizing explained a considerable amount of variance in pain and disability parameters in both samples thus underlining its validity. The psychological variables internalising, anxiety sensitivity and somatosensory amplification showed significant small to moderate associations with pain catastrophizing and also with pain and disability. After controlling for the above mentioned psychological variables, catastrophizing still yielded an independent contribution to the explanation of variance in pain and disability parameters.

Conclusions: The PCS-C in its German form is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing catastrophizing in children with recurrent pain, in particular headache, in the age of 10-16 years. Pain catastrophizing is suggested to be assessed especially in pediatric pain patients as it is a significant moderator of pain and disability. In children with a distinct tendency to catastrophize cognitive restructuring should become a target of pediatric pain therapy, as a reduction of catastrophizing cognitions may indirectly help to ameliorate pain and disability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信