本体感觉训练与视觉反馈改善中风患者上肢功能:一项初步研究。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Neural Plasticity Pub Date : 2022-01-15 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/1588090
Jieying He, Chong Li, Jiali Lin, Beibei Shu, Bin Ye, Jianhui Wang, Yifang Lin, Jie Jia
{"title":"本体感觉训练与视觉反馈改善中风患者上肢功能:一项初步研究。","authors":"Jieying He,&nbsp;Chong Li,&nbsp;Jiali Lin,&nbsp;Beibei Shu,&nbsp;Bin Ye,&nbsp;Jianhui Wang,&nbsp;Yifang Lin,&nbsp;Jie Jia","doi":"10.1155/2022/1588090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proprioceptive deficit is one of the common sensory impairments following stroke and has a negative impact on motor performance. However, evidence-based training procedures and cost-efficient training setups for patients with poststroke are still limited. We compared the effects of proprioceptive training versus nonspecific sensory stimulation on upper limb proprioception and motor function rehabilitation. In this multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 40 participants with poststroke hemiparesis were enrolled from 3 hospitals in China. Participants were assigned randomly to receive proprioceptive training involving passive and active movements with visual feedback (proprioceptive training group [PG]; <i>n</i> = 20) or nonspecific sensory stimulation (control group [CG]; <i>n</i> = 20) 20 times in four weeks. Each session lasted 30 minutes. A clinical assessor blinded to group assignment evaluated patients before and after the intervention. The primary outcome was the change in the motor subscale of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE-M). Secondary outcomes were changes in box and block test (BBT), thumb localization test (TLT), the sensory subscale of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE-S), and Barthel Index (BI). The results showed that the mean change scores of FMA-UE were significantly greater in the PG than in the CG (<i>p</i> = 0.010 for FMA-UE-M, <i>p</i> = 0.033 for FMA-UE-S). The PG group was improved significantly in TLT (<i>p</i> = 0.010) and BBT (<i>p</i> = 0.027), while there was no significant improvement in TLT (<i>p</i> = 0.083) and BBT (<i>p</i> = 0.107) for the CG group. The results showed that proprioceptive training was effective in improving proprioception and motor function of the upper extremity in patients with poststroke. This trial is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000037808).</p>","PeriodicalId":51299,"journal":{"name":"Neural Plasticity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783730/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proprioceptive Training with Visual Feedback Improves Upper Limb Function in Stroke Patients: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jieying He,&nbsp;Chong Li,&nbsp;Jiali Lin,&nbsp;Beibei Shu,&nbsp;Bin Ye,&nbsp;Jianhui Wang,&nbsp;Yifang Lin,&nbsp;Jie Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/1588090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Proprioceptive deficit is one of the common sensory impairments following stroke and has a negative impact on motor performance. However, evidence-based training procedures and cost-efficient training setups for patients with poststroke are still limited. We compared the effects of proprioceptive training versus nonspecific sensory stimulation on upper limb proprioception and motor function rehabilitation. In this multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 40 participants with poststroke hemiparesis were enrolled from 3 hospitals in China. Participants were assigned randomly to receive proprioceptive training involving passive and active movements with visual feedback (proprioceptive training group [PG]; <i>n</i> = 20) or nonspecific sensory stimulation (control group [CG]; <i>n</i> = 20) 20 times in four weeks. Each session lasted 30 minutes. A clinical assessor blinded to group assignment evaluated patients before and after the intervention. The primary outcome was the change in the motor subscale of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE-M). Secondary outcomes were changes in box and block test (BBT), thumb localization test (TLT), the sensory subscale of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE-S), and Barthel Index (BI). The results showed that the mean change scores of FMA-UE were significantly greater in the PG than in the CG (<i>p</i> = 0.010 for FMA-UE-M, <i>p</i> = 0.033 for FMA-UE-S). The PG group was improved significantly in TLT (<i>p</i> = 0.010) and BBT (<i>p</i> = 0.027), while there was no significant improvement in TLT (<i>p</i> = 0.083) and BBT (<i>p</i> = 0.107) for the CG group. The results showed that proprioceptive training was effective in improving proprioception and motor function of the upper extremity in patients with poststroke. This trial is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000037808).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neural Plasticity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783730/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neural Plasticity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1588090\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Plasticity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1588090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本体感觉缺陷是脑卒中后常见的感觉障碍之一,对运动表现有负面影响。然而,卒中后患者的循证培训程序和成本效益培训设置仍然有限。我们比较了本体感觉训练与非特异性感觉刺激对上肢本体感觉和运动功能康复的影响。在这项多中心、单盲、随机对照试验中,来自中国3家医院的40名卒中后偏瘫患者入组。参与者被随机分配接受本体感觉训练,包括被动和主动运动和视觉反馈(本体感觉训练组[PG];n = 20)或非特异性感觉刺激(对照组[CG];N = 20) 4周内20次。每节课持续30分钟。一名临床评估员在干预前后对患者进行盲法分组评估。主要结果是Fugl-Meyer上肢运动量表(FMA-UE-M)的变化。次要结果为盒块测试(BBT)、拇指定位测试(TLT)、Fugl-Meyer上肢感觉分量表(FMA-UE-S)和Barthel指数(BI)的变化。结果显示,PG组FMA-UE的平均变化评分显著高于CG组(FMA-UE- m组p = 0.010, FMA-UE- s组p = 0.033)。PG组TLT (p = 0.010)和BBT (p = 0.027)均有显著改善,而CG组TLT (p = 0.083)和BBT (p = 0.107)无显著改善。结果表明,本体感觉训练能有效改善脑卒中后患者的本体感觉和上肢运动功能。该试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2000037808)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Proprioceptive Training with Visual Feedback Improves Upper Limb Function in Stroke Patients: A Pilot Study.

Proprioceptive Training with Visual Feedback Improves Upper Limb Function in Stroke Patients: A Pilot Study.

Proprioceptive Training with Visual Feedback Improves Upper Limb Function in Stroke Patients: A Pilot Study.

Proprioceptive Training with Visual Feedback Improves Upper Limb Function in Stroke Patients: A Pilot Study.

Proprioceptive deficit is one of the common sensory impairments following stroke and has a negative impact on motor performance. However, evidence-based training procedures and cost-efficient training setups for patients with poststroke are still limited. We compared the effects of proprioceptive training versus nonspecific sensory stimulation on upper limb proprioception and motor function rehabilitation. In this multicenter, single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 40 participants with poststroke hemiparesis were enrolled from 3 hospitals in China. Participants were assigned randomly to receive proprioceptive training involving passive and active movements with visual feedback (proprioceptive training group [PG]; n = 20) or nonspecific sensory stimulation (control group [CG]; n = 20) 20 times in four weeks. Each session lasted 30 minutes. A clinical assessor blinded to group assignment evaluated patients before and after the intervention. The primary outcome was the change in the motor subscale of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE-M). Secondary outcomes were changes in box and block test (BBT), thumb localization test (TLT), the sensory subscale of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE-S), and Barthel Index (BI). The results showed that the mean change scores of FMA-UE were significantly greater in the PG than in the CG (p = 0.010 for FMA-UE-M, p = 0.033 for FMA-UE-S). The PG group was improved significantly in TLT (p = 0.010) and BBT (p = 0.027), while there was no significant improvement in TLT (p = 0.083) and BBT (p = 0.107) for the CG group. The results showed that proprioceptive training was effective in improving proprioception and motor function of the upper extremity in patients with poststroke. This trial is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000037808).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neural Plasticity
Neural Plasticity NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Neural Plasticity is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles related to all aspects of neural plasticity, with special emphasis on its functional significance as reflected in behavior and in psychopathology. Neural Plasticity publishes research and review articles from the entire range of relevant disciplines, including basic neuroscience, behavioral neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, biological psychology, and biological psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信