在认知听力科学中实施的听觉Stroop测试:发展和规范数据。

IF 1.2 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Katrien Kestens, Sofie Degeest, Marijke Miatton, Hannah Keppler
{"title":"在认知听力科学中实施的听觉Stroop测试:发展和规范数据。","authors":"Katrien Kestens,&nbsp;Sofie Degeest,&nbsp;Marijke Miatton,&nbsp;Hannah Keppler","doi":"10.21500/20112084.5118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study developed and gained insight in an auditory Stroop test, implementable in cognitive hearing sciences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An auditory Stroop test was developed and performed in 178 participants, aged between 18 and 69 years. This Auditory Stroop test consisted of two tests: Stroop-tones and Stroop-words whereby the pitch of pure-tones and spoken words (i.e., the words high and low) had to be identified by high or low, respectively. An interference score was calculated as a measure of verbal executive functioning. Regression models were conducted to examine the effect of age, sex, education, awakeness, hearing, as well as visual and verbal working memory, and processing speed on the auditory Stroop scores. Normative data were obtained per age decade.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the visual counterparts, the auditory Stroop outcomes were better predicted by verbal working memory and processing speed. A trend was observed showing a decrease in performances with increasing age. No other participant-related variables had a significant relationship with the auditory Stroop test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This auditory Stroop test was considered a good test for measuring executive functioning using auditory stimuli. Implementing this auditory Stroop test within cognitive hearing sciences will contribute to unravel the auditory-cognitive perspective of speech understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":46542,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychological Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d6/6e/2011-2084-ijpr-14-02-37.PMC8794330.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Auditory Stroop Test to Implement in Cognitive Hearing Sciences: Development and Normative Data.\",\"authors\":\"Katrien Kestens,&nbsp;Sofie Degeest,&nbsp;Marijke Miatton,&nbsp;Hannah Keppler\",\"doi\":\"10.21500/20112084.5118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study developed and gained insight in an auditory Stroop test, implementable in cognitive hearing sciences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An auditory Stroop test was developed and performed in 178 participants, aged between 18 and 69 years. This Auditory Stroop test consisted of two tests: Stroop-tones and Stroop-words whereby the pitch of pure-tones and spoken words (i.e., the words high and low) had to be identified by high or low, respectively. An interference score was calculated as a measure of verbal executive functioning. Regression models were conducted to examine the effect of age, sex, education, awakeness, hearing, as well as visual and verbal working memory, and processing speed on the auditory Stroop scores. Normative data were obtained per age decade.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the visual counterparts, the auditory Stroop outcomes were better predicted by verbal working memory and processing speed. A trend was observed showing a decrease in performances with increasing age. No other participant-related variables had a significant relationship with the auditory Stroop test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This auditory Stroop test was considered a good test for measuring executive functioning using auditory stimuli. Implementing this auditory Stroop test within cognitive hearing sciences will contribute to unravel the auditory-cognitive perspective of speech understanding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychological Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d6/6e/2011-2084-ijpr-14-02-37.PMC8794330.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5118\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.5118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:本研究开发并获得了听觉Stroop测试的见解,可在认知听力科学中实施。方法:对178名年龄在18岁至69岁之间的参与者进行了听觉Stroop测试。这个听觉Stroop测试包括两个测试:Stroop-tones和Stroop-words,其中纯音和口语单词(即high和low单词)的音高必须分别由high或low来识别。干扰得分作为言语执行功能的衡量标准。采用回归模型检验年龄、性别、教育程度、清醒程度、听力、视觉和言语工作记忆以及处理速度对听觉Stroop得分的影响。标准数据按年龄10年计算。结果:言语工作记忆和加工速度能较好地预测听觉Stroop结果。随着年龄的增长,表现出性能下降的趋势。没有其他与参与者相关的变量与听觉Stroop测试有显著的关系。结论:该听觉Stroop测验被认为是使用听觉刺激测量执行功能的一个很好的测验。在认知听力科学中实施这种听觉Stroop测试将有助于揭示言语理解的听觉认知视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Auditory Stroop Test to Implement in Cognitive Hearing Sciences: Development and Normative Data.

Objective: This study developed and gained insight in an auditory Stroop test, implementable in cognitive hearing sciences.

Methods: An auditory Stroop test was developed and performed in 178 participants, aged between 18 and 69 years. This Auditory Stroop test consisted of two tests: Stroop-tones and Stroop-words whereby the pitch of pure-tones and spoken words (i.e., the words high and low) had to be identified by high or low, respectively. An interference score was calculated as a measure of verbal executive functioning. Regression models were conducted to examine the effect of age, sex, education, awakeness, hearing, as well as visual and verbal working memory, and processing speed on the auditory Stroop scores. Normative data were obtained per age decade.

Results: Compared to the visual counterparts, the auditory Stroop outcomes were better predicted by verbal working memory and processing speed. A trend was observed showing a decrease in performances with increasing age. No other participant-related variables had a significant relationship with the auditory Stroop test.

Conclusion: This auditory Stroop test was considered a good test for measuring executive functioning using auditory stimuli. Implementing this auditory Stroop test within cognitive hearing sciences will contribute to unravel the auditory-cognitive perspective of speech understanding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychological Research
International Journal of Psychological Research PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychological Research (Int.j.psychol.res) is the Faculty of Psychology’s official publication of San Buenaventura University in Medellin, Colombia. Int.j.psychol.res relies on a vast and diverse theoretical and thematic publishing material, which includes unpublished productions of diverse psychological issues and behavioral human areas such as psychiatry, neurosciences, mental health, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信