提高风险调整系统的性能:限制回归、再保险和变量选择》(Constrained Regressions, Reinsurance, and Variable Selection.

IF 3.1 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
American Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-10-04 DOI:10.1086/716199
Thomas G McGuire, Anna L Zink, Sherri Rose
{"title":"提高风险调整系统的性能:限制回归、再保险和变量选择》(Constrained Regressions, Reinsurance, and Variable Selection.","authors":"Thomas G McGuire, Anna L Zink, Sherri Rose","doi":"10.1086/716199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modifications of risk-adjustment systems used to pay health plans in individual health insurance markets typically seek to reduce selection incentives at the individual and group levels by adding variables to the payment formula. Adding variables can be costly and lead to unintended incentives for upcoding or service utilization. While these drawbacks are recognized, they are hard to quantify and difficult to balance against the concrete, measurable improvements in fit that may be achieved by adding variables to the formula. This paper takes a different approach to improving the performance of health plan payment systems. Using the HHS-HHC V0519 model from the Marketplaces as a starting point, we constrain fit at the individual and group level to be as good or better than the current payment model while <i>reducing</i> the number of variables in the model. We introduce three elements in the design of plan payment: reinsurance, constrained regressions, and machine learning methods for variable selection. The fit performance of our alternative formulas with many fewer variables is as good or better than the current HHS-HHC V0519 formula.</p>","PeriodicalId":45056,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Economics","volume":"7 4","pages":"497-521"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635414/pdf/nihms-1733043.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the Performance of Risk Adjustment Systems: Constrained Regressions, Reinsurance, and Variable Selection.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas G McGuire, Anna L Zink, Sherri Rose\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/716199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Modifications of risk-adjustment systems used to pay health plans in individual health insurance markets typically seek to reduce selection incentives at the individual and group levels by adding variables to the payment formula. Adding variables can be costly and lead to unintended incentives for upcoding or service utilization. While these drawbacks are recognized, they are hard to quantify and difficult to balance against the concrete, measurable improvements in fit that may be achieved by adding variables to the formula. This paper takes a different approach to improving the performance of health plan payment systems. Using the HHS-HHC V0519 model from the Marketplaces as a starting point, we constrain fit at the individual and group level to be as good or better than the current payment model while <i>reducing</i> the number of variables in the model. We introduce three elements in the design of plan payment: reinsurance, constrained regressions, and machine learning methods for variable selection. The fit performance of our alternative formulas with many fewer variables is as good or better than the current HHS-HHC V0519 formula.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"497-521\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8635414/pdf/nihms-1733043.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/716199\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/716199","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对用于支付个人医疗保险市场医疗计划的风险调整系统进行修改,通常是通过在支付公式中增加变量来减少个人和团体层面的选择动机。增加变量的成本可能会很高,而且会导致无意中的激励措施,如向上编码或服务利用。虽然这些弊端已得到认可,但它们很难量化,也很难与通过在公式中添加变量而实现的具体、可衡量的改善相平衡。本文采用不同的方法来提高医疗计划支付系统的绩效。我们以市场平台中的 HHS-HHC V0519 模型为起点,在减少模型中变量数量的同时,限制个人和团体层面的匹配度,使其与当前的支付模型一样好或更好。我们在计划支付的设计中引入了三个要素:再保险、约束回归和用于变量选择的机器学习方法。变量数量减少后,我们的替代公式的拟合性能与当前的 HHS-HHC V0519 公式一样好,甚至更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the Performance of Risk Adjustment Systems: Constrained Regressions, Reinsurance, and Variable Selection.

Modifications of risk-adjustment systems used to pay health plans in individual health insurance markets typically seek to reduce selection incentives at the individual and group levels by adding variables to the payment formula. Adding variables can be costly and lead to unintended incentives for upcoding or service utilization. While these drawbacks are recognized, they are hard to quantify and difficult to balance against the concrete, measurable improvements in fit that may be achieved by adding variables to the formula. This paper takes a different approach to improving the performance of health plan payment systems. Using the HHS-HHC V0519 model from the Marketplaces as a starting point, we constrain fit at the individual and group level to be as good or better than the current payment model while reducing the number of variables in the model. We introduce three elements in the design of plan payment: reinsurance, constrained regressions, and machine learning methods for variable selection. The fit performance of our alternative formulas with many fewer variables is as good or better than the current HHS-HHC V0519 formula.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health Economics (AJHE) provides a forum for the in-depth analysis of health care markets and individual health behaviors. The articles appearing in AJHE are authored by scholars from universities, private research organizations, government, and industry. Subjects of interest include competition among private insurers, hospitals, and physicians; impacts of public insurance programs, including the Affordable Care Act; pharmaceutical innovation and regulation; medical device supply; the rise of obesity and its consequences; the influence and growth of aging populations; and much more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信