使用糖皮质激素治疗严重 COVID-19 的现实世界证据。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2022-01-19 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420188211072704
Alejandra Albarrán-Sánchez, Claudia Ramírez-Rentería, Moisés Mercado, Miriam Sánchez-García, Corazón de Jesús Barrientos-Flores, Aldo Ferreira-Hermosillo
{"title":"使用糖皮质激素治疗严重 COVID-19 的现实世界证据。","authors":"Alejandra Albarrán-Sánchez, Claudia Ramírez-Rentería, Moisés Mercado, Miriam Sánchez-García, Corazón de Jesús Barrientos-Flores, Aldo Ferreira-Hermosillo","doi":"10.1177/20420188211072704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Currently, only glucocorticoids have proved to impact adverse outcomes in COVID-19. However, their risk/benefit balance remains inconclusive and populations' characteristics should be considered.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to evaluate the real-life use of glucocorticoids in patients with severe COVID-19 hospitalized in a third-level referral center and to determine the type, accumulated doses, and the in-hospital outcomes related with their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated a retrospective cohort of 737 patients with criteria for severe COVID-19 and a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2. We extracted data for epidemiological analysis, medical history, and medications, as well as baseline laboratory tests. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 and nonparametric tests, medians, and interquartile ranges (IQR). A <i>p</i> < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 65.3% were men, with a median age of 59 years (IQR 46-70) and a median of 10 days of hospital stay (IQR 6-16), more than 40% had diabetes, hypertension, and/or obesity, and 0.8% used steroids chronically. At the time of the study, 54.0% had been discharged due to improvement and 40.8% died. The most common treatment used was dexamethasone 6 mg/day/10 days (46.6%). Patients with a complete dexamethasone scheme [as proposed by the Randomized Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy (RECOVERY) study] had a lower mortality risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.441, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.232-0.840] in comparison with patients with lower doses (HR 1.803, 95% CI 1.080-3.012). Patients with methylprednisolone or several steroids tended to have higher cumulative doses (equivalent to >675 mg of prednisolone).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of steroids in severe COVID-19 reduces mortality only at the dose proposed in the RECOVERY study in the younger population. No benefit of the use of steroids was observed in patients with older age or higher number of comorbidities.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/48/1e/10.1177_20420188211072704.PMC8777321.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world evidence of the use of glucocorticoids for severe COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Alejandra Albarrán-Sánchez, Claudia Ramírez-Rentería, Moisés Mercado, Miriam Sánchez-García, Corazón de Jesús Barrientos-Flores, Aldo Ferreira-Hermosillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20420188211072704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Currently, only glucocorticoids have proved to impact adverse outcomes in COVID-19. However, their risk/benefit balance remains inconclusive and populations' characteristics should be considered.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to evaluate the real-life use of glucocorticoids in patients with severe COVID-19 hospitalized in a third-level referral center and to determine the type, accumulated doses, and the in-hospital outcomes related with their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated a retrospective cohort of 737 patients with criteria for severe COVID-19 and a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2. We extracted data for epidemiological analysis, medical history, and medications, as well as baseline laboratory tests. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 and nonparametric tests, medians, and interquartile ranges (IQR). A <i>p</i> < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 65.3% were men, with a median age of 59 years (IQR 46-70) and a median of 10 days of hospital stay (IQR 6-16), more than 40% had diabetes, hypertension, and/or obesity, and 0.8% used steroids chronically. At the time of the study, 54.0% had been discharged due to improvement and 40.8% died. The most common treatment used was dexamethasone 6 mg/day/10 days (46.6%). Patients with a complete dexamethasone scheme [as proposed by the Randomized Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy (RECOVERY) study] had a lower mortality risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.441, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.232-0.840] in comparison with patients with lower doses (HR 1.803, 95% CI 1.080-3.012). Patients with methylprednisolone or several steroids tended to have higher cumulative doses (equivalent to >675 mg of prednisolone).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of steroids in severe COVID-19 reduces mortality only at the dose proposed in the RECOVERY study in the younger population. No benefit of the use of steroids was observed in patients with older age or higher number of comorbidities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/48/1e/10.1177_20420188211072704.PMC8777321.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420188211072704\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420188211072704","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介目前,只有糖皮质激素被证明会影响 COVID-19 的不良后果。然而,糖皮质激素的风险/收益平衡仍无定论,应考虑人群的特点:目的:评估在一家三级转诊中心住院的重症 COVID-19 患者实际使用糖皮质激素的情况,并确定糖皮质激素的类型、累积剂量以及与使用糖皮质激素相关的院内预后:我们对 737 名符合重症 COVID-19 标准且 SARS-CoV-2 聚合酶链反应 (PCR) 检测呈阳性的患者进行了回顾性队列评估。我们提取了用于流行病学分析、病史、用药以及基线实验室检测的数据。数据采用 SPSS 21.0 和非参数检验、中位数和四分位数间距 (IQR) 进行分析。A p 结果:65.3%的患者为男性,年龄中位数为59岁(IQR 46-70),住院时间中位数为10天(IQR 6-16),40%以上的患者患有糖尿病、高血压和/或肥胖症,0.8%的患者长期使用类固醇。研究期间,54.0%的患者因病情好转而出院,40.8%的患者死亡。最常用的治疗方法是地塞米松 6 毫克/天/10 天(46.6%)。与使用较小剂量的患者相比(HR 1.803,95% CI 1.080-3.012),使用完全地塞米松方案(如 COVID-19 疗法随机评估(RECOVERY)研究提出的方案)的患者死亡率较低[危险比(HR)0.441,95% 置信区间(CI)0.232-0.840]。使用甲基强的松龙或多种类固醇的患者的累积剂量往往较高(相当于大于675毫克强的松龙):结论:COVID-19重症患者使用类固醇仅能在RECOVERY研究中建议的剂量下降低死亡率。在年龄较大或合并症较多的患者中,没有观察到使用类固醇的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Real-world evidence of the use of glucocorticoids for severe COVID-19.

Real-world evidence of the use of glucocorticoids for severe COVID-19.

Real-world evidence of the use of glucocorticoids for severe COVID-19.

Real-world evidence of the use of glucocorticoids for severe COVID-19.

Introduction: Currently, only glucocorticoids have proved to impact adverse outcomes in COVID-19. However, their risk/benefit balance remains inconclusive and populations' characteristics should be considered.

Objective: The objective was to evaluate the real-life use of glucocorticoids in patients with severe COVID-19 hospitalized in a third-level referral center and to determine the type, accumulated doses, and the in-hospital outcomes related with their use.

Methods: We evaluated a retrospective cohort of 737 patients with criteria for severe COVID-19 and a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2. We extracted data for epidemiological analysis, medical history, and medications, as well as baseline laboratory tests. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 and nonparametric tests, medians, and interquartile ranges (IQR). A p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: A total of 65.3% were men, with a median age of 59 years (IQR 46-70) and a median of 10 days of hospital stay (IQR 6-16), more than 40% had diabetes, hypertension, and/or obesity, and 0.8% used steroids chronically. At the time of the study, 54.0% had been discharged due to improvement and 40.8% died. The most common treatment used was dexamethasone 6 mg/day/10 days (46.6%). Patients with a complete dexamethasone scheme [as proposed by the Randomized Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy (RECOVERY) study] had a lower mortality risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.441, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.232-0.840] in comparison with patients with lower doses (HR 1.803, 95% CI 1.080-3.012). Patients with methylprednisolone or several steroids tended to have higher cumulative doses (equivalent to >675 mg of prednisolone).

Conclusion: The use of steroids in severe COVID-19 reduces mortality only at the dose proposed in the RECOVERY study in the younger population. No benefit of the use of steroids was observed in patients with older age or higher number of comorbidities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信