欧洲神经外科医生的全球神经外科活动现状。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgical sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-11 DOI:10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05447-3
Saniya Mediratta, Laura Lippa, Sara Venturini, Andreas K Demetriades, Abdessamad El-Ouahabi, Maria L Gandía-González, William Harkness, Peter Hutchinson, Kee B Park, Katrin Rabiei, Gail Rosseau, Karl Schaller, Franco Servadei, Jesus Lafuente, Angelos G Kolias
{"title":"欧洲神经外科医生的全球神经外科活动现状。","authors":"Saniya Mediratta, Laura Lippa, Sara Venturini, Andreas K Demetriades, Abdessamad El-Ouahabi, Maria L Gandía-González, William Harkness, Peter Hutchinson, Kee B Park, Katrin Rabiei, Gail Rosseau, Karl Schaller, Franco Servadei, Jesus Lafuente, Angelos G Kolias","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05447-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The expanding field of global neurosurgery calls for a committed neurosurgical community to advocate for universal access to timely, safe, and affordable neurosurgical care for everyone, everywhere. The aim of this study was to assess the current state of global neurosurgery activity amongst European neurosurgeons and to identify barriers to involvement in global neurosurgery initiatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study through dissemination of a web-based survey, from September 2019 to January 2020, to collect data from European neurosurgeons at various career stages. Descriptive analysis was conducted on respondent data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and ten neurosurgeons from 40 European countries responded: 53.5% regularly follow global neurosurgery developments, and 29.4% had travelled abroad with a global neurosurgery collaborative, with 23.2% planning a future trip. Respondents from high income European countries predominantly travelled to Africa (41.6%) or Asia (34.4%), whereas respondents from middle income European countries frequently traversed Europe (63.2%) and North America (47.4%). Cost implications (66.5%) were the most common barrier to global neurosurgery activity, followed by interference with current practice (45.8%), family duties (35.2%), difficulties obtaining humanitarian leave (27.7%) and lack of international partners (27.4%). 86.8% would incorporate a global neurosurgery period within training programmes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>European neurosurgeons are interested in engaging in global neurosurgery partnerships, and several sustainable programs focused on local capacity building, education and research have been established over the last decade. However, individual and system barriers to engagement persist. We provided insight into these to allow development of tailored mechanisms to overcome such barriers, enabling European neurosurgeons to advocate for the Global Surgery 2030 goals.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current state of global neurosurgery activity amongst European neurosurgeons.\",\"authors\":\"Saniya Mediratta, Laura Lippa, Sara Venturini, Andreas K Demetriades, Abdessamad El-Ouahabi, Maria L Gandía-González, William Harkness, Peter Hutchinson, Kee B Park, Katrin Rabiei, Gail Rosseau, Karl Schaller, Franco Servadei, Jesus Lafuente, Angelos G Kolias\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05447-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The expanding field of global neurosurgery calls for a committed neurosurgical community to advocate for universal access to timely, safe, and affordable neurosurgical care for everyone, everywhere. The aim of this study was to assess the current state of global neurosurgery activity amongst European neurosurgeons and to identify barriers to involvement in global neurosurgery initiatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional study through dissemination of a web-based survey, from September 2019 to January 2020, to collect data from European neurosurgeons at various career stages. Descriptive analysis was conducted on respondent data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and ten neurosurgeons from 40 European countries responded: 53.5% regularly follow global neurosurgery developments, and 29.4% had travelled abroad with a global neurosurgery collaborative, with 23.2% planning a future trip. Respondents from high income European countries predominantly travelled to Africa (41.6%) or Asia (34.4%), whereas respondents from middle income European countries frequently traversed Europe (63.2%) and North America (47.4%). Cost implications (66.5%) were the most common barrier to global neurosurgery activity, followed by interference with current practice (45.8%), family duties (35.2%), difficulties obtaining humanitarian leave (27.7%) and lack of international partners (27.4%). 86.8% would incorporate a global neurosurgery period within training programmes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>European neurosurgeons are interested in engaging in global neurosurgery partnerships, and several sustainable programs focused on local capacity building, education and research have been established over the last decade. However, individual and system barriers to engagement persist. We provided insight into these to allow development of tailored mechanisms to overcome such barriers, enabling European neurosurgeons to advocate for the Global Surgery 2030 goals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05447-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05447-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不断扩大的全球神经外科领域要求神经外科界致力于倡导为世界各地的每个人普及及时、安全和负担得起的神经外科护理。本研究旨在:(i) 评估欧洲神经外科医生的全球神经外科活动现状;(ii) 识别参与全球神经外科活动的障碍:横断面研究:2019 年 9 月至 2020 年 1 月,通过传播基于网络的调查,收集处于不同职业阶段的欧洲神经外科医生的数据。对受访者数据进行描述性分析:来自 40 个欧洲国家的 3100 名神经外科医生做出了回复。53.5%的人定期关注全球神经外科发展。29.4%的人曾随全球神经外科合作组织出国旅行,23.2%的人计划将来出国旅行。来自高收入欧洲国家的受访者主要前往非洲(41.6%)或亚洲(34.4%),而来自中等收入欧洲国家的受访者则经常前往欧洲(63.2%)和北美(47.4%)。成本影响(66.5%)是全球神经外科活动最常见的障碍,其次是干扰当前实践(45.8%)、家庭责任(35.2%)、难以获得人道主义假期(27.7%)和缺乏国际合作伙伴(27.4%)。86.8%的人希望在培训计划中加入全球神经外科培训期:结论:欧洲神经外科医生对参与全球神经外科合作很感兴趣,过去十年中已建立了几个以当地能力建设、教育和研究为重点的可持续计划。然而,个人和系统的参与障碍依然存在。我们对这些障碍进行了深入探讨,以便制定有针对性的机制来克服这些障碍,使欧洲神经外科医生能够倡导全球外科 2030 目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current state of global neurosurgery activity amongst European neurosurgeons.

Background: The expanding field of global neurosurgery calls for a committed neurosurgical community to advocate for universal access to timely, safe, and affordable neurosurgical care for everyone, everywhere. The aim of this study was to assess the current state of global neurosurgery activity amongst European neurosurgeons and to identify barriers to involvement in global neurosurgery initiatives.

Methods: Cross-sectional study through dissemination of a web-based survey, from September 2019 to January 2020, to collect data from European neurosurgeons at various career stages. Descriptive analysis was conducted on respondent data.

Results: Three hundred and ten neurosurgeons from 40 European countries responded: 53.5% regularly follow global neurosurgery developments, and 29.4% had travelled abroad with a global neurosurgery collaborative, with 23.2% planning a future trip. Respondents from high income European countries predominantly travelled to Africa (41.6%) or Asia (34.4%), whereas respondents from middle income European countries frequently traversed Europe (63.2%) and North America (47.4%). Cost implications (66.5%) were the most common barrier to global neurosurgery activity, followed by interference with current practice (45.8%), family duties (35.2%), difficulties obtaining humanitarian leave (27.7%) and lack of international partners (27.4%). 86.8% would incorporate a global neurosurgery period within training programmes.

Conclusions: European neurosurgeons are interested in engaging in global neurosurgery partnerships, and several sustainable programs focused on local capacity building, education and research have been established over the last decade. However, individual and system barriers to engagement persist. We provided insight into these to allow development of tailored mechanisms to overcome such barriers, enabling European neurosurgeons to advocate for the Global Surgery 2030 goals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信