一种基于细胞的药物E型肉毒杆菌抗毒素小鼠效价测定的替代方法。

ALTEX Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-19 DOI:10.14573/altex.2105251
Eran Diamant, Amram Torgeman, Eyal Epstein, Adva Mechaly, Alon Ben David, Lilach Levin, Arieh Schwartz, Eyal Dor, Meni Girshengorn, Ada Barnea, Ohad Mazor, Ran Zichel
{"title":"一种基于细胞的药物E型肉毒杆菌抗毒素小鼠效价测定的替代方法。","authors":"Eran Diamant,&nbsp;Amram Torgeman,&nbsp;Eyal Epstein,&nbsp;Adva Mechaly,&nbsp;Alon Ben David,&nbsp;Lilach Levin,&nbsp;Arieh Schwartz,&nbsp;Eyal Dor,&nbsp;Meni Girshengorn,&nbsp;Ada Barnea,&nbsp;Ohad Mazor,&nbsp;Ran Zichel","doi":"10.14573/altex.2105251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pharmacopeia mouse neutralization assay (PMNA) is the standard method for determining the potency of phar­maceutical botulinum antitoxins. However, a PMNA requires a large number of mice, and, thus, an alternative in vitro method to replace it is needed. Herein, we developed an in vitro SiMa cell line-based neutralization assay (SBNA), compatible with a PMNA design, for therapeutic antitoxins against type E botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT/E). The SBNA measures the residual cellular activity of BoNT/E following antitoxin neutralization in the SiMa lysate using a specific quantitative sandwich ELISA for its cleaved cellular target protein SNAP-25. The potencies of different pharmaceutical antitoxin preparations were determined by applying two different quantification approaches: (1) a cutoff value, in accor­dance with the pharmacopeia concept, and (2) nonlinear regression of a standard curve generated by serial dilutions of a standard antitoxin. Both approaches achieved accurate potencies compared to the PMNA (average %RE of ~16%). Furthermore, the SBNA was able to determine in vitro, for the first time, the accurate neutralizing activity (%RE ≤ 20) of next-generation equine and rabbit therapeutic antitoxins. Collectively, a high correlation between SBNA and PMNA results was obtained for all antitoxin preparations (r = 0.99, P < 0.0001 for the standard curve approach, and r = 0.97, p < 0.0001 for the cutoff approach). In conclusion, the SBNA can potentially replace the PMNA and markedly reduce the need for laboratory animals for the approval of botulinum antitoxin preparations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520550,"journal":{"name":"ALTEX","volume":" ","pages":"113-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cell-based alternative to the mouse potency assay for pharmaceutical type E botulinum antitoxins.\",\"authors\":\"Eran Diamant,&nbsp;Amram Torgeman,&nbsp;Eyal Epstein,&nbsp;Adva Mechaly,&nbsp;Alon Ben David,&nbsp;Lilach Levin,&nbsp;Arieh Schwartz,&nbsp;Eyal Dor,&nbsp;Meni Girshengorn,&nbsp;Ada Barnea,&nbsp;Ohad Mazor,&nbsp;Ran Zichel\",\"doi\":\"10.14573/altex.2105251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The pharmacopeia mouse neutralization assay (PMNA) is the standard method for determining the potency of phar­maceutical botulinum antitoxins. However, a PMNA requires a large number of mice, and, thus, an alternative in vitro method to replace it is needed. Herein, we developed an in vitro SiMa cell line-based neutralization assay (SBNA), compatible with a PMNA design, for therapeutic antitoxins against type E botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT/E). The SBNA measures the residual cellular activity of BoNT/E following antitoxin neutralization in the SiMa lysate using a specific quantitative sandwich ELISA for its cleaved cellular target protein SNAP-25. The potencies of different pharmaceutical antitoxin preparations were determined by applying two different quantification approaches: (1) a cutoff value, in accor­dance with the pharmacopeia concept, and (2) nonlinear regression of a standard curve generated by serial dilutions of a standard antitoxin. Both approaches achieved accurate potencies compared to the PMNA (average %RE of ~16%). Furthermore, the SBNA was able to determine in vitro, for the first time, the accurate neutralizing activity (%RE ≤ 20) of next-generation equine and rabbit therapeutic antitoxins. Collectively, a high correlation between SBNA and PMNA results was obtained for all antitoxin preparations (r = 0.99, P < 0.0001 for the standard curve approach, and r = 0.97, p < 0.0001 for the cutoff approach). In conclusion, the SBNA can potentially replace the PMNA and markedly reduce the need for laboratory animals for the approval of botulinum antitoxin preparations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ALTEX\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"113-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ALTEX\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2105251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ALTEX","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2105251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

药典小鼠中和试验(PMNA)是测定药用肉毒杆菌抗毒素效价的标准方法。然而,PMNA需要大量的小鼠,因此,需要一种替代的体外方法来取代它。在此,我们开发了一种体外基于SiMa细胞系的中和试验(SBNA),与PMNA设计兼容,用于治疗E型肉毒杆菌神经毒素(BoNT/E)的抗毒素。SBNA在SiMa裂解物中抗毒素中和后,使用特定的定量夹心ELISA检测其裂解的细胞靶蛋白SNAP-25,测量BoNT/E的剩余细胞活性。采用两种不同的定量方法测定不同抗毒素制剂的效价:(1)根据药典概念确定截断值;(2)对标准抗毒素连续稀释产生的标准曲线进行非线性回归。与PMNA相比,两种方法都获得了准确的电位(平均%RE为~16%)。此外,SBNA能够首次在体外准确测定下一代马和兔治疗性抗毒素的中和活性(%RE≤20)。总的来说,所有抗毒素制剂的SBNA和PMNA结果之间具有高度相关性(标准曲线方法r = 0.99, P < 0.0001,截止方法r = 0.97, P < 0.0001)。综上所述,SBNA有可能取代PMNA,并显著减少肉毒杆菌抗毒素制剂批准时对实验动物的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A cell-based alternative to the mouse potency assay for pharmaceutical type E botulinum antitoxins.

The pharmacopeia mouse neutralization assay (PMNA) is the standard method for determining the potency of phar­maceutical botulinum antitoxins. However, a PMNA requires a large number of mice, and, thus, an alternative in vitro method to replace it is needed. Herein, we developed an in vitro SiMa cell line-based neutralization assay (SBNA), compatible with a PMNA design, for therapeutic antitoxins against type E botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT/E). The SBNA measures the residual cellular activity of BoNT/E following antitoxin neutralization in the SiMa lysate using a specific quantitative sandwich ELISA for its cleaved cellular target protein SNAP-25. The potencies of different pharmaceutical antitoxin preparations were determined by applying two different quantification approaches: (1) a cutoff value, in accor­dance with the pharmacopeia concept, and (2) nonlinear regression of a standard curve generated by serial dilutions of a standard antitoxin. Both approaches achieved accurate potencies compared to the PMNA (average %RE of ~16%). Furthermore, the SBNA was able to determine in vitro, for the first time, the accurate neutralizing activity (%RE ≤ 20) of next-generation equine and rabbit therapeutic antitoxins. Collectively, a high correlation between SBNA and PMNA results was obtained for all antitoxin preparations (r = 0.99, P < 0.0001 for the standard curve approach, and r = 0.97, p < 0.0001 for the cutoff approach). In conclusion, the SBNA can potentially replace the PMNA and markedly reduce the need for laboratory animals for the approval of botulinum antitoxin preparations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信