评估慢性阻塞性肺病患者肺气肿的标准肺活量测定法:肺气肿严重程度指数(ESI)。

IF 2 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-06 eCollection Date: 2021-01-15 DOI:10.4081/mrm.2021.805
Roberto W Dal Negro, Matteo Paoletti, Massimo Pistolesi
{"title":"评估慢性阻塞性肺病患者肺气肿的标准肺活量测定法:肺气肿严重程度指数(ESI)。","authors":"Roberto W Dal Negro, Matteo Paoletti, Massimo Pistolesi","doi":"10.4081/mrm.2021.805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a generic term identifying a condition characterized by variable changes in peripheral airways and lung parenchyma. Standard spirometry cannot discriminate the relative role of conductive airways inflammatory changes from destructive parenchymal emphysema changes. The aim of this study was to quantify the emphysema component in COPD by a simple parameter (the Emphysema Severity Index - ESI), previously proved to reflect CT-assessed emphysema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ESI was obtained by fitting the descending limb of MEFV curves by a fully automated procedure providing a 0 to 10 score of emphysema severity. ESI was computed in COPD patients enrolled in the CLIMA Study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vast majority of ESI values ranged from 0 to 4, compatible with no-to-mild/moderate emphysema component. A limited proportion of patients showed ESI values >4, compatible with severe-to-very severe emphysema. ESI values were greatly dispersed within each GOLD class indicating that GOLD classification cannot discriminate emphysema and conductive airways changes in patients with similar airflow limitation. ESI and diffusing capacity (DL<sub>CO</sub>) were significantly correlated (p<0.001). However, the great dispersion in their correlation suggests that ESI and DL<sub>CO</sub> reflect partially different anatomo-functional determinants in COPD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Airflow limitation has heterogenous determinants in COPD. Inflammatory and destructive changes may combine in CT densitometric alterations that cannot be detected by standard spirometry. ESI computation from spirometric data helps to define the prevailing pathogenetic mechanism underlying the measured airflow limitation. ESI could be a reliable advancement to select large samples of patients in clinical or epidemiological trials, and to compare different pharmacological treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":51135,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"805"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/a6/mrm-16-1-805.PMC8672489.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standard spirometry to assess emphysema in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Emphysema Severity Index (ESI).\",\"authors\":\"Roberto W Dal Negro, Matteo Paoletti, Massimo Pistolesi\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/mrm.2021.805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a generic term identifying a condition characterized by variable changes in peripheral airways and lung parenchyma. Standard spirometry cannot discriminate the relative role of conductive airways inflammatory changes from destructive parenchymal emphysema changes. The aim of this study was to quantify the emphysema component in COPD by a simple parameter (the Emphysema Severity Index - ESI), previously proved to reflect CT-assessed emphysema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ESI was obtained by fitting the descending limb of MEFV curves by a fully automated procedure providing a 0 to 10 score of emphysema severity. ESI was computed in COPD patients enrolled in the CLIMA Study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The vast majority of ESI values ranged from 0 to 4, compatible with no-to-mild/moderate emphysema component. A limited proportion of patients showed ESI values >4, compatible with severe-to-very severe emphysema. ESI values were greatly dispersed within each GOLD class indicating that GOLD classification cannot discriminate emphysema and conductive airways changes in patients with similar airflow limitation. ESI and diffusing capacity (DL<sub>CO</sub>) were significantly correlated (p<0.001). However, the great dispersion in their correlation suggests that ESI and DL<sub>CO</sub> reflect partially different anatomo-functional determinants in COPD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Airflow limitation has heterogenous determinants in COPD. Inflammatory and destructive changes may combine in CT densitometric alterations that cannot be detected by standard spirometry. ESI computation from spirometric data helps to define the prevailing pathogenetic mechanism underlying the measured airflow limitation. ESI could be a reliable advancement to select large samples of patients in clinical or epidemiological trials, and to compare different pharmacological treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"805\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3f/a6/mrm-16-1-805.PMC8672489.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/mrm.2021.805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/mrm.2021.805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一个通用术语,是一种以外周气道和肺实质的不同变化为特征的疾病。标准肺活量无法区分传导性气道炎症变化与破坏性实质肺气肿变化的相对作用。本研究的目的是通过一个简单的参数(肺气肿严重程度指数-ESI)来量化慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的肺气肿成分:方法:ESI 是通过全自动程序拟合 MEFV 曲线的下肢得到的,该程序可提供 0 到 10 分的肺气肿严重程度评分。对参加 CLIMA 研究的 COPD 患者进行了 ESI 计算:结果:绝大多数患者的 ESI 值介于 0 到 4 之间,与无至轻度/中度肺气肿成分相符。一小部分患者的 ESI 值大于 4,与重度至极重度肺气肿相符。ESI值在每个GOLD分级中的分布很不均匀,这表明GOLD分级无法区分气流受限相似的患者中的肺气肿和传导性气道改变。ESI与弥散能力(DLCO)有显著相关性(pCO反映了慢性阻塞性肺疾病中部分不同的解剖功能决定因素):结论:慢性阻塞性肺病的气流受限具有不同的决定因素。炎症性和破坏性变化可能共同导致 CT 密度改变,而标准肺活量测量无法检测到这些改变。根据肺活量数据计算 ESI 有助于确定气流受限的主要发病机制。在临床或流行病学试验中,ESI 可以作为选择大样本患者和比较不同药物治疗的可靠方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Standard spirometry to assess emphysema in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Emphysema Severity Index (ESI).

Standard spirometry to assess emphysema in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Emphysema Severity Index (ESI).

Standard spirometry to assess emphysema in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Emphysema Severity Index (ESI).

Standard spirometry to assess emphysema in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the Emphysema Severity Index (ESI).

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a generic term identifying a condition characterized by variable changes in peripheral airways and lung parenchyma. Standard spirometry cannot discriminate the relative role of conductive airways inflammatory changes from destructive parenchymal emphysema changes. The aim of this study was to quantify the emphysema component in COPD by a simple parameter (the Emphysema Severity Index - ESI), previously proved to reflect CT-assessed emphysema.

Methods: ESI was obtained by fitting the descending limb of MEFV curves by a fully automated procedure providing a 0 to 10 score of emphysema severity. ESI was computed in COPD patients enrolled in the CLIMA Study.

Results: The vast majority of ESI values ranged from 0 to 4, compatible with no-to-mild/moderate emphysema component. A limited proportion of patients showed ESI values >4, compatible with severe-to-very severe emphysema. ESI values were greatly dispersed within each GOLD class indicating that GOLD classification cannot discriminate emphysema and conductive airways changes in patients with similar airflow limitation. ESI and diffusing capacity (DLCO) were significantly correlated (p<0.001). However, the great dispersion in their correlation suggests that ESI and DLCO reflect partially different anatomo-functional determinants in COPD.

Conclusions: Airflow limitation has heterogenous determinants in COPD. Inflammatory and destructive changes may combine in CT densitometric alterations that cannot be detected by standard spirometry. ESI computation from spirometric data helps to define the prevailing pathogenetic mechanism underlying the measured airflow limitation. ESI could be a reliable advancement to select large samples of patients in clinical or epidemiological trials, and to compare different pharmacological treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine is the official journal of the Italian Respiratory Society - Società Italiana di Pneumologia (IRS/SIP). The journal publishes on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related fields, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary and translational research. The interdisciplinary nature of the journal provides a unique opportunity for researchers, clinicians and healthcare professionals across specialties to collaborate and exchange information. The journal provides a high visibility platform for the publication and dissemination of top quality original scientific articles, reviews and important position papers documenting clinical and experimental advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信