非囊性纤维化支气管扩张症的临床功能参数与受累肺叶数量之间的相关性。

IF 2 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine Pub Date : 2021-12-03 eCollection Date: 2021-01-15 DOI:10.4081/mrm.2021.791
Valeria Giacon, Stefano Sanduzzi Zamparelli, Alessandro Sanduzzi Zamparelli, Dario Bruzzese, Marialuisa Bocchino
{"title":"非囊性纤维化支气管扩张症的临床功能参数与受累肺叶数量之间的相关性。","authors":"Valeria Giacon, Stefano Sanduzzi Zamparelli, Alessandro Sanduzzi Zamparelli, Dario Bruzzese, Marialuisa Bocchino","doi":"10.4081/mrm.2021.791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, the prognosis of bronchiectasis is based on different prognostic indicators, like BSI and FACED score, founded on clinical-demographic, functional and radiological criteria. Both scoring systems include the number of lobes involved in bronchiectasis, which represents an adverse prognostic index. Our study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of the clinical-functional parameters and the number of involved lobes ratio in adult bronchiectasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted on 52 patients diagnosed with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) between 2015 and 2017 who attended the Pneumology Unit of Monaldi Hospital in Naples, Italy. Correlations between clinical- functional parameters (BMI, smoking history, number of exacerbations in the previous year, spirometry, DL<sub>CO</sub>, ABG test, and 6MWT) and number of involved lobes were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the number of exacerbations in the previous year had a statistically significant association with the number of involved lobes. Furthermore, at baseline, the radiological criterion was also negatively associated with some functional parameters (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ratio e FEF<sub>25-75%</sub>). Statistical significance was lost during the follow up, demonstrating the effectiveness of the therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Imaging extension represents a promising biomarker of disease severity as well as a helpful follow up tool for non-Cystic Fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB).</p>","PeriodicalId":51135,"journal":{"name":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"791"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/37/mrm-16-1-791.PMC8672485.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between clinical-functional parameters and number of lobes involved in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.\",\"authors\":\"Valeria Giacon, Stefano Sanduzzi Zamparelli, Alessandro Sanduzzi Zamparelli, Dario Bruzzese, Marialuisa Bocchino\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/mrm.2021.791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, the prognosis of bronchiectasis is based on different prognostic indicators, like BSI and FACED score, founded on clinical-demographic, functional and radiological criteria. Both scoring systems include the number of lobes involved in bronchiectasis, which represents an adverse prognostic index. Our study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of the clinical-functional parameters and the number of involved lobes ratio in adult bronchiectasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted on 52 patients diagnosed with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) between 2015 and 2017 who attended the Pneumology Unit of Monaldi Hospital in Naples, Italy. Correlations between clinical- functional parameters (BMI, smoking history, number of exacerbations in the previous year, spirometry, DL<sub>CO</sub>, ABG test, and 6MWT) and number of involved lobes were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the number of exacerbations in the previous year had a statistically significant association with the number of involved lobes. Furthermore, at baseline, the radiological criterion was also negatively associated with some functional parameters (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ratio e FEF<sub>25-75%</sub>). Statistical significance was lost during the follow up, demonstrating the effectiveness of the therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Imaging extension represents a promising biomarker of disease severity as well as a helpful follow up tool for non-Cystic Fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/75/37/mrm-16-1-791.PMC8672485.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/mrm.2021.791\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/mrm.2021.791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前,支气管扩张症的预后基于不同的预后指标,如 BSI 和 FACED 评分,这些指标建立在临床-人口学、功能和放射学标准的基础上。这两种评分系统都包括支气管扩张症累及的肺叶数量,这是一个不利的预后指标。我们的研究旨在探讨临床功能参数和受累肺叶数量比在成人支气管扩张症中的预后作用:研究对象为2015年至2017年期间被诊断为非囊性纤维化支气管扩张症(NCFB)的52名患者,他们均在意大利那不勒斯莫纳尔迪医院肺病科就诊。研究人员调查了临床功能参数(体重指数、吸烟史、前一年病情加重次数、肺活量、DLCO、ABG测试和6MWT)与受累肺叶数量之间的相关性:结果:在基线时,上一年病情加重的次数与受累肺叶的数量有显著的统计学关联。此外,在基线时,放射学标准还与一些功能参数(FEV1/FVC 比率 e FEF25-75%)呈负相关。统计意义在随访期间消失,这表明了治疗的有效性:成像扩展是衡量疾病严重程度的一种有前途的生物标志物,也是非囊性纤维化支气管扩张症(NCFB)的一种有用的随访工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Correlation between clinical-functional parameters and number of lobes involved in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.

Background: Currently, the prognosis of bronchiectasis is based on different prognostic indicators, like BSI and FACED score, founded on clinical-demographic, functional and radiological criteria. Both scoring systems include the number of lobes involved in bronchiectasis, which represents an adverse prognostic index. Our study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of the clinical-functional parameters and the number of involved lobes ratio in adult bronchiectasis.

Methods: The study was conducted on 52 patients diagnosed with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) between 2015 and 2017 who attended the Pneumology Unit of Monaldi Hospital in Naples, Italy. Correlations between clinical- functional parameters (BMI, smoking history, number of exacerbations in the previous year, spirometry, DLCO, ABG test, and 6MWT) and number of involved lobes were investigated.

Results: At baseline, the number of exacerbations in the previous year had a statistically significant association with the number of involved lobes. Furthermore, at baseline, the radiological criterion was also negatively associated with some functional parameters (FEV1/FVC ratio e FEF25-75%). Statistical significance was lost during the follow up, demonstrating the effectiveness of the therapy.

Conclusions: Imaging extension represents a promising biomarker of disease severity as well as a helpful follow up tool for non-Cystic Fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine is the official journal of the Italian Respiratory Society - Società Italiana di Pneumologia (IRS/SIP). The journal publishes on all aspects of respiratory medicine and related fields, with a particular focus on interdisciplinary and translational research. The interdisciplinary nature of the journal provides a unique opportunity for researchers, clinicians and healthcare professionals across specialties to collaborate and exchange information. The journal provides a high visibility platform for the publication and dissemination of top quality original scientific articles, reviews and important position papers documenting clinical and experimental advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信