Muteb Alanazi , Patrick Caroline , Matthew Lampa , Maria Liu
{"title":"年轻人使用多焦点角膜透气性隐形眼镜的视力表现:一项初步研究","authors":"Muteb Alanazi , Patrick Caroline , Matthew Lampa , Maria Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2022.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the performance of four experimental multifocal gas permeable contact lens (MFGPCL) designs and their impact on visual function in young adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seventeen young adults (age, 23.17 ± 4.48 years) enrolled in the study. Each participant was randomly assigned to wear two of four MFGPCL designs. They wore the first type of the assigned lens binocularly for one week and, after one week of washout period, wore another design on both eyes for another week. The four MFGPCL designs were as follows: design A (distance zone [DZ] 1.5 mm / add 3.0 D), B (DZ 1.5 mm / add 1.5 D), C (DZ 3.0 mm / add 3.0 D), and D (DZ 3.0 mm / add 1.5 D). Baseline visual acuity, contrast sensitivity function, and accommodation data were collected at baseline and repeated after one week of MFGPCL daily wear.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Distance and near visual acuities were not significant affected with the four MFGPCL designs. Contrast sensitivity was significantly lower in design A across all measured spatial frequencies (<em>p</em> < 0.05), with no significant impact from other designs on all frequencies. No significant effect was observed on accommodation measured at 33 cm (<em>p</em> > 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Three of the investigated MFGPCL designs preserve satisfactory visual performance. Lens design A incorporated with higher add and smaller center zone diameter had a stronger impact on the visual performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"15 4","pages":"Pages 305-312"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/5d/main.PMC9537242.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visual performance with multifocal corneal gas-permeable contact lenses in young adults: A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Muteb Alanazi , Patrick Caroline , Matthew Lampa , Maria Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optom.2022.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the performance of four experimental multifocal gas permeable contact lens (MFGPCL) designs and their impact on visual function in young adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Seventeen young adults (age, 23.17 ± 4.48 years) enrolled in the study. Each participant was randomly assigned to wear two of four MFGPCL designs. They wore the first type of the assigned lens binocularly for one week and, after one week of washout period, wore another design on both eyes for another week. The four MFGPCL designs were as follows: design A (distance zone [DZ] 1.5 mm / add 3.0 D), B (DZ 1.5 mm / add 1.5 D), C (DZ 3.0 mm / add 3.0 D), and D (DZ 3.0 mm / add 1.5 D). Baseline visual acuity, contrast sensitivity function, and accommodation data were collected at baseline and repeated after one week of MFGPCL daily wear.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Distance and near visual acuities were not significant affected with the four MFGPCL designs. Contrast sensitivity was significantly lower in design A across all measured spatial frequencies (<em>p</em> < 0.05), with no significant impact from other designs on all frequencies. No significant effect was observed on accommodation measured at 33 cm (<em>p</em> > 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Three of the investigated MFGPCL designs preserve satisfactory visual performance. Lens design A incorporated with higher add and smaller center zone diameter had a stronger impact on the visual performance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 305-312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/5d/main.PMC9537242.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429622000012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429622000012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的评价四种实验性多焦透气性隐形眼镜(MFGPCL)的性能及其对青少年视功能的影响。方法17例青壮年(23.17±4.48岁)入组研究。每个参与者被随机分配穿四种MFGPCL设计中的两种。他们用双眼戴第一种指定的镜片一周,经过一周的冲洗期后,再在两只眼睛上戴另一种设计的镜片一周。四种MFGPCL设计分别为:A(距离区[DZ] 1.5 mm /添加3.0 D)、B (DZ 1.5 mm /添加1.5 D)、C (DZ 3.0 mm /添加3.0 D)和D (DZ 3.0 mm /添加1.5 D)。在基线时收集基线视力、对比敏感度函数和调节数据,并在MFGPCL日常佩戴一周后重复。结果四种MFGPCL设计对远、近视力均无显著影响。在所有测量的空间频率上,设计A的对比敏感度显著降低(p <0.05),其他设计对所有频率没有显著影响。在33厘米处没有观察到明显的调节作用(p >0.05)。结论3种MFGPCL设计保持了满意的视觉效果。镜头设计A采用更高的添加量和更小的中心区直径,对视觉表现的影响更大。
Visual performance with multifocal corneal gas-permeable contact lenses in young adults: A pilot study
Objectives
To evaluate the performance of four experimental multifocal gas permeable contact lens (MFGPCL) designs and their impact on visual function in young adults.
Methods
Seventeen young adults (age, 23.17 ± 4.48 years) enrolled in the study. Each participant was randomly assigned to wear two of four MFGPCL designs. They wore the first type of the assigned lens binocularly for one week and, after one week of washout period, wore another design on both eyes for another week. The four MFGPCL designs were as follows: design A (distance zone [DZ] 1.5 mm / add 3.0 D), B (DZ 1.5 mm / add 1.5 D), C (DZ 3.0 mm / add 3.0 D), and D (DZ 3.0 mm / add 1.5 D). Baseline visual acuity, contrast sensitivity function, and accommodation data were collected at baseline and repeated after one week of MFGPCL daily wear.
Results
Distance and near visual acuities were not significant affected with the four MFGPCL designs. Contrast sensitivity was significantly lower in design A across all measured spatial frequencies (p < 0.05), with no significant impact from other designs on all frequencies. No significant effect was observed on accommodation measured at 33 cm (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
Three of the investigated MFGPCL designs preserve satisfactory visual performance. Lens design A incorporated with higher add and smaller center zone diameter had a stronger impact on the visual performance.