巩膜眼镜片佩戴期间的巩膜张力测量精度:一项初步研究。

IF 1.4 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Clinical Optometry Pub Date : 2021-12-31 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTO.S339411
Allen Y Ganjei, Gabriel G L Shlager, Daniel Brocks
{"title":"巩膜眼镜片佩戴期间的巩膜张力测量精度:一项初步研究。","authors":"Allen Y Ganjei,&nbsp;Gabriel G L Shlager,&nbsp;Daniel Brocks","doi":"10.2147/OPTO.S339411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the reproducibility, and therefore the utility, of using traditional tonometry devices for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP), while a prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem device (PD) or scleral lens is applied to the eye.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Twenty subjects (40 eyes) with keratoconus were enrolled. With PD applied, the first 10 consecutive patients had IOP measured multiple times with a handheld tonometer (Tono-Pen AVIA, Reichert, Depew, NY) on the superotemporal sclera 1 mm posterior to the PD edge. This identical procedure was repeated for the next 10 consecutive patients with a pneumatonometer (Model 30, Reichert, Depew, NY). Once three reliable measurements, as defined by the study protocol, were obtained for an eye, the procedure was repeated with the same tonometer device on the fellow eye.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean standard deviation for reliable IOP measurements was ±2.92 mmHg, median (IQR) of 2.62 (1.68 to 3.53) mmHg in the handheld tonometer group and ±1.98 mmHg in the pneumatonometer group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.07). The mean IOP range for the reliable IOP measurements was 5.5 ± 3.80 mmHg, median (IQR) of 5 (3 to 7) mmHg for the handheld tonometer group and 3.71 ±1.12 mmHg in the pneumatonometer group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Handheld tonometry and pneumatonometry have poor reproducibility when used to measure scleral IOP in keratoconus patients, while a PD is applied to the eye. An alternative research model and methodology should be investigated and confirmed to have precision prior to proceeding with further analysis of any relationship between scleral lens wear and IOP.</p>","PeriodicalId":43701,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Optometry","volume":"13 ","pages":"341-350"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/99/8a/opto-13-341.PMC8725838.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scleral Tonometry Precision During Scleral Lens Wear: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Allen Y Ganjei,&nbsp;Gabriel G L Shlager,&nbsp;Daniel Brocks\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/OPTO.S339411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the reproducibility, and therefore the utility, of using traditional tonometry devices for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP), while a prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem device (PD) or scleral lens is applied to the eye.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Twenty subjects (40 eyes) with keratoconus were enrolled. With PD applied, the first 10 consecutive patients had IOP measured multiple times with a handheld tonometer (Tono-Pen AVIA, Reichert, Depew, NY) on the superotemporal sclera 1 mm posterior to the PD edge. This identical procedure was repeated for the next 10 consecutive patients with a pneumatonometer (Model 30, Reichert, Depew, NY). Once three reliable measurements, as defined by the study protocol, were obtained for an eye, the procedure was repeated with the same tonometer device on the fellow eye.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean standard deviation for reliable IOP measurements was ±2.92 mmHg, median (IQR) of 2.62 (1.68 to 3.53) mmHg in the handheld tonometer group and ±1.98 mmHg in the pneumatonometer group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.07). The mean IOP range for the reliable IOP measurements was 5.5 ± 3.80 mmHg, median (IQR) of 5 (3 to 7) mmHg for the handheld tonometer group and 3.71 ±1.12 mmHg in the pneumatonometer group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Handheld tonometry and pneumatonometry have poor reproducibility when used to measure scleral IOP in keratoconus patients, while a PD is applied to the eye. An alternative research model and methodology should be investigated and confirmed to have precision prior to proceeding with further analysis of any relationship between scleral lens wear and IOP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43701,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Optometry\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"341-350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/99/8a/opto-13-341.PMC8725838.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S339411\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTO.S339411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估使用传统眼压仪测量眼内压(IOP)的再现性和实用性,同时使用假体替代眼表生态系统装置(PD)或巩膜晶状体。患者与方法:入选圆锥角膜患者20例(40只眼)。应用PD后,前10名连续患者使用手持式眼压计(Tono-Pen AVIA, Reichert, Depew, NY)在PD边缘后1mm的颞上巩膜上多次测量IOP。接下来的10例患者使用气压计(型号30,Reichert, Depew, NY)重复相同的步骤。根据研究方案的定义,一旦获得一只眼睛的三个可靠测量值,则在另一只眼睛上使用相同的眼压计设备重复该过程。结果:可靠眼压测量的平均标准差为±2.92 mmHg,手持式眼压计组的中位数(IQR)为2.62 (1.68 ~ 3.53)mmHg,气压计组的中位数(IQR)为±1.98 mmHg。两组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.07)。可靠IOP测量的平均IOP范围为5.5±3.80 mmHg,手持式眼压计组的中位数(IQR)为5 (3 ~ 7)mmHg,气压计组的中位数(IQR)为3.71±1.12 mmHg。两组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.06)。结论:手持式眼压计和气压计测量圆锥角膜患者巩膜IOP的重复性较差,而PD则用于眼部。在进一步分析巩膜晶状体磨损与IOP之间的关系之前,应该研究并确认一种替代的研究模型和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Scleral Tonometry Precision During Scleral Lens Wear: A Pilot Study.

Scleral Tonometry Precision During Scleral Lens Wear: A Pilot Study.

Scleral Tonometry Precision During Scleral Lens Wear: A Pilot Study.

Purpose: To evaluate the reproducibility, and therefore the utility, of using traditional tonometry devices for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP), while a prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem device (PD) or scleral lens is applied to the eye.

Patients and methods: Twenty subjects (40 eyes) with keratoconus were enrolled. With PD applied, the first 10 consecutive patients had IOP measured multiple times with a handheld tonometer (Tono-Pen AVIA, Reichert, Depew, NY) on the superotemporal sclera 1 mm posterior to the PD edge. This identical procedure was repeated for the next 10 consecutive patients with a pneumatonometer (Model 30, Reichert, Depew, NY). Once three reliable measurements, as defined by the study protocol, were obtained for an eye, the procedure was repeated with the same tonometer device on the fellow eye.

Results: The mean standard deviation for reliable IOP measurements was ±2.92 mmHg, median (IQR) of 2.62 (1.68 to 3.53) mmHg in the handheld tonometer group and ±1.98 mmHg in the pneumatonometer group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.07). The mean IOP range for the reliable IOP measurements was 5.5 ± 3.80 mmHg, median (IQR) of 5 (3 to 7) mmHg for the handheld tonometer group and 3.71 ±1.12 mmHg in the pneumatonometer group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.06).

Conclusion: Handheld tonometry and pneumatonometry have poor reproducibility when used to measure scleral IOP in keratoconus patients, while a PD is applied to the eye. An alternative research model and methodology should be investigated and confirmed to have precision prior to proceeding with further analysis of any relationship between scleral lens wear and IOP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Optometry
Clinical Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
29
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Optometry is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on clinical optometry. All aspects of patient care are addressed within the journal as well as the practice of optometry including economic and business analyses. Basic and clinical research papers are published that cover all aspects of optics, refraction and its application to the theory and practice of optometry. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Theoretical and applied optics, Delivery of patient care in optometry practice, Refraction and correction of errors, Screening and preventative aspects of eye disease, Extended clinical roles for optometrists including shared care and provision of medications, Teaching and training optometrists, International aspects of optometry, Business practice, Patient adherence, quality of life, satisfaction, Health economic evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信