邮寄肠癌筛检:识别行为障碍。

Psycho-Oncology Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2021-12-30 DOI:10.1002/pon.5866
Larry Myers, Belinda C Goodwin, Michael Ireland, Sonja March, Joanne Aitken
{"title":"邮寄肠癌筛检:识别行为障碍。","authors":"Larry Myers,&nbsp;Belinda C Goodwin,&nbsp;Michael Ireland,&nbsp;Sonja March,&nbsp;Joanne Aitken","doi":"10.1002/pon.5866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the actions taken by recipients of mail-out faecal occult blood test (FOBT) kits and to identify the points at which progress towards kit completion typically stops. Differences according to gender, age, and screening intention were also examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1599 people completed an online survey identifying the actions they took upon receiving an FOBT kit. Latent class analysis was conducted to identify latent subgroups of participants that reported similar actions. Differences between gender, age, and intention status were assessed using non-invariance testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four latent subgroups of FOBT invitees were identified: those who complete and return their FOBT kit ('completers'); those who bring the kit into their house but go no further ('ignorers'); those who open the package and read the bowel cancer information materials but go no further ('readers'); and those who read the instructions but do not place the kit near the toilet and do not complete their FOBT kit ('leavers'). Non-completers who intended to use the kit were most likely to be in the 'leavers' class, while those who had no intention were most likely to be in the 'readers' class.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Distinct subgroups of non-responders exist among bowel cancer screening invitees, suggesting different behaviour change interventions are needed to facilitate participation. Some invitees, especially those with high participatory intention, are likely to benefit from prompts to take the kit into the toilet, while others, with little participatory intention, often read the invitation materials presenting an opportunity to intervene with health messages.</p>","PeriodicalId":516935,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"816-823"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mail-out bowel cancer screening: Identifying the behavioural stumbling blocks.\",\"authors\":\"Larry Myers,&nbsp;Belinda C Goodwin,&nbsp;Michael Ireland,&nbsp;Sonja March,&nbsp;Joanne Aitken\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pon.5866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the actions taken by recipients of mail-out faecal occult blood test (FOBT) kits and to identify the points at which progress towards kit completion typically stops. Differences according to gender, age, and screening intention were also examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>1599 people completed an online survey identifying the actions they took upon receiving an FOBT kit. Latent class analysis was conducted to identify latent subgroups of participants that reported similar actions. Differences between gender, age, and intention status were assessed using non-invariance testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four latent subgroups of FOBT invitees were identified: those who complete and return their FOBT kit ('completers'); those who bring the kit into their house but go no further ('ignorers'); those who open the package and read the bowel cancer information materials but go no further ('readers'); and those who read the instructions but do not place the kit near the toilet and do not complete their FOBT kit ('leavers'). Non-completers who intended to use the kit were most likely to be in the 'leavers' class, while those who had no intention were most likely to be in the 'readers' class.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Distinct subgroups of non-responders exist among bowel cancer screening invitees, suggesting different behaviour change interventions are needed to facilitate participation. Some invitees, especially those with high participatory intention, are likely to benefit from prompts to take the kit into the toilet, while others, with little participatory intention, often read the invitation materials presenting an opportunity to intervene with health messages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"816-823\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5866\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:描述邮寄粪便隐血检查(FOBT)试剂盒的接收者所采取的行动,并确定试剂盒完成过程中通常停止的点。性别、年龄和筛查意向的差异也被检查。方法:1599人完成了一项在线调查,确定了他们在收到FOBT工具包后采取的行动。进行潜在分类分析以确定报告相似行为的潜在参与者亚组。使用非不变检验评估性别、年龄和意向状态之间的差异。结果:确定了FOBT受邀者的四个潜在亚组:完成并归还FOBT试剂盒的人(“完成者”);那些把工具包带回家却不走的人(“无视者”);那些打开包装阅读肠癌信息材料但没有继续阅读的人(“读者”);以及那些阅读了说明但没有将工具包放在厕所附近并且没有完成他们的FOBT工具包(“离开者”)的人。打算使用这套工具的未完成者最有可能属于“离开者”一类,而那些无意使用这套工具的人最有可能属于“阅读者”一类。结论:在肠癌筛查的受邀者中存在不同的无反应亚组,这表明需要不同的行为改变干预措施来促进参与。一些被邀请者,特别是那些有高度参与意愿的人,可能会受益于将工具包带入厕所的提示,而其他没有多少参与意愿的人往往会阅读邀请材料,这些材料提供了一个干预健康信息的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mail-out bowel cancer screening: Identifying the behavioural stumbling blocks.

Objective: To describe the actions taken by recipients of mail-out faecal occult blood test (FOBT) kits and to identify the points at which progress towards kit completion typically stops. Differences according to gender, age, and screening intention were also examined.

Methods: 1599 people completed an online survey identifying the actions they took upon receiving an FOBT kit. Latent class analysis was conducted to identify latent subgroups of participants that reported similar actions. Differences between gender, age, and intention status were assessed using non-invariance testing.

Results: Four latent subgroups of FOBT invitees were identified: those who complete and return their FOBT kit ('completers'); those who bring the kit into their house but go no further ('ignorers'); those who open the package and read the bowel cancer information materials but go no further ('readers'); and those who read the instructions but do not place the kit near the toilet and do not complete their FOBT kit ('leavers'). Non-completers who intended to use the kit were most likely to be in the 'leavers' class, while those who had no intention were most likely to be in the 'readers' class.

Conclusions: Distinct subgroups of non-responders exist among bowel cancer screening invitees, suggesting different behaviour change interventions are needed to facilitate participation. Some invitees, especially those with high participatory intention, are likely to benefit from prompts to take the kit into the toilet, while others, with little participatory intention, often read the invitation materials presenting an opportunity to intervene with health messages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信