利用亨利-福特灵活参与模式,缩小研究和质量改进方面的患者参与差距。

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2022-01-17 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.17294/2330-0698.1828
Heather A Olden, Sara Santarossa, Dana Murphy, Christine C Johnson, Karen E Kippen
{"title":"利用亨利-福特灵活参与模式,缩小研究和质量改进方面的患者参与差距。","authors":"Heather A Olden, Sara Santarossa, Dana Murphy, Christine C Johnson, Karen E Kippen","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This paper was intended to share a flexible engagement model (FEM) for organizing a structure to obtain patient input regarding health care operations and research, provide greater detail on recruitment, retention, and dissemination strategies, and demonstrate successes and potential applications in other health care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing a pragmatic approach, the Patient-Engaged Research Center (PERC) at Henry Ford Health System developed the FEM, a 7-step process to introduce interested patients/caregivers to the patient advisor program and to follow up with placements. PERC developed a meeting evaluation to measure participant satisfaction. Retention and dissemination methods to keep participants consistently engaged included monthly email blasts, an annual patient advisor retreat, and inviting patient advisors to attend/present at local and national conferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of January 2020, the program had 419 patient advisors. Almost 50% self-reported as Caucasian and 31% as African American; 73% were women, and most were 45-74 years of age. Recruitment methods proved effective, as 85% of advisors were initially engaged through print and digital marketing. Mean advisor orientation workshop evaluation scores regarding content, facilitators, and logistics were high, with all 4.5 or higher on a Likert scale of 1 (strongly negative) to 5 (strongly positive).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the FEM's flexible nature and adaptability, PERC has been successful in effectively leveraging the patient voice and experiences in research and health care delivery. Further research could investigate the model's generalizability, return on investment, and how to formally embed its methodology institutionally.</p>","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772608/pdf/jpcrr-9.1.35.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the Patient Engagement Gap in Research and Quality Improvement Utilizing the Henry Ford Flexible Engagement Model.\",\"authors\":\"Heather A Olden, Sara Santarossa, Dana Murphy, Christine C Johnson, Karen E Kippen\",\"doi\":\"10.17294/2330-0698.1828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This paper was intended to share a flexible engagement model (FEM) for organizing a structure to obtain patient input regarding health care operations and research, provide greater detail on recruitment, retention, and dissemination strategies, and demonstrate successes and potential applications in other health care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing a pragmatic approach, the Patient-Engaged Research Center (PERC) at Henry Ford Health System developed the FEM, a 7-step process to introduce interested patients/caregivers to the patient advisor program and to follow up with placements. PERC developed a meeting evaluation to measure participant satisfaction. Retention and dissemination methods to keep participants consistently engaged included monthly email blasts, an annual patient advisor retreat, and inviting patient advisors to attend/present at local and national conferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of January 2020, the program had 419 patient advisors. Almost 50% self-reported as Caucasian and 31% as African American; 73% were women, and most were 45-74 years of age. Recruitment methods proved effective, as 85% of advisors were initially engaged through print and digital marketing. Mean advisor orientation workshop evaluation scores regarding content, facilitators, and logistics were high, with all 4.5 or higher on a Likert scale of 1 (strongly negative) to 5 (strongly positive).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the FEM's flexible nature and adaptability, PERC has been successful in effectively leveraging the patient voice and experiences in research and health care delivery. Further research could investigate the model's generalizability, return on investment, and how to formally embed its methodology institutionally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8772608/pdf/jpcrr-9.1.35.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1828\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文旨在分享一种灵活的参与模式(FEM),该模式用于组织结构以获取患者对医疗运营和研究的意见,提供有关招募、保留和传播策略的更多细节,并展示在其他医疗机构的成功经验和潜在应用:亨利-福特医疗系统的患者参与研究中心(PERC)采用务实的方法开发了 FEM,这是一个分为 7 个步骤的流程,用于将感兴趣的患者/护理人员介绍给患者顾问计划,并对安置情况进行跟踪。PERC 开发了一种会议评估方法来衡量参与者的满意度。保持参与者持续参与的保留和传播方法包括每月发送电子邮件、每年举办一次患者顾问务虚会,以及邀请患者顾问参加当地和全国性会议并在会上发言:截至 2020 年 1 月,该计划共有 419 名患者顾问。近 50% 的顾问自称是白种人,31% 是非裔美国人;73% 是女性,年龄大多在 45-74 岁之间。招募方法证明是有效的,因为 85% 的顾问最初是通过印刷品和数字营销进行招募的。顾问指导研讨会在内容、主持人和后勤方面的平均评价得分都很高,在 1 分(强烈负面)到 5 分(强烈正面)的李克特量表中,得分都在 4.5 分或以上:鉴于 FEM 的灵活性和适应性,PERC 成功地在研究和医疗服务中有效利用了患者的声音和经验。进一步的研究可以探讨该模式的可推广性、投资回报以及如何在机构中正式嵌入其方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bridging the Patient Engagement Gap in Research and Quality Improvement Utilizing the Henry Ford Flexible Engagement Model.

Bridging the Patient Engagement Gap in Research and Quality Improvement Utilizing the Henry Ford Flexible Engagement Model.

Purpose: This paper was intended to share a flexible engagement model (FEM) for organizing a structure to obtain patient input regarding health care operations and research, provide greater detail on recruitment, retention, and dissemination strategies, and demonstrate successes and potential applications in other health care settings.

Methods: Utilizing a pragmatic approach, the Patient-Engaged Research Center (PERC) at Henry Ford Health System developed the FEM, a 7-step process to introduce interested patients/caregivers to the patient advisor program and to follow up with placements. PERC developed a meeting evaluation to measure participant satisfaction. Retention and dissemination methods to keep participants consistently engaged included monthly email blasts, an annual patient advisor retreat, and inviting patient advisors to attend/present at local and national conferences.

Results: As of January 2020, the program had 419 patient advisors. Almost 50% self-reported as Caucasian and 31% as African American; 73% were women, and most were 45-74 years of age. Recruitment methods proved effective, as 85% of advisors were initially engaged through print and digital marketing. Mean advisor orientation workshop evaluation scores regarding content, facilitators, and logistics were high, with all 4.5 or higher on a Likert scale of 1 (strongly negative) to 5 (strongly positive).

Conclusions: Given the FEM's flexible nature and adaptability, PERC has been successful in effectively leveraging the patient voice and experiences in research and health care delivery. Further research could investigate the model's generalizability, return on investment, and how to formally embed its methodology institutionally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信