Jessica E McDade, Hannah C Deming, Samara Jinks-Chang, Maria R Paulsen, Anthony L Bui, Monica S Vavilala, Frederick P Rivara, Eileen M Bulger
{"title":"高中生止血训练:监护人态度及其与先前创伤的关系。","authors":"Jessica E McDade, Hannah C Deming, Samara Jinks-Chang, Maria R Paulsen, Anthony L Bui, Monica S Vavilala, Frederick P Rivara, Eileen M Bulger","doi":"10.1111/josh.13134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uncontrolled bleeding is the leading preventable cause of death after injury. Stop the Bleed (STB) is a bleeding control training with proposed expansion into schools. However, the attitudes of guardians, specifically those with past trauma/injury, towards expanding STB into schools are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey evaluated guardian attitudes towards STB training in high schools, and compared responses between guardians based on the experience of prior trauma. Logistic regression models evaluated the association between prior trauma and guardian-reported acceptability of STB training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 750 guardians who received the survey, 484 (64.5%) responded. Most guardians (95.3%) wanted their child trained. Few (4.2%) felt this training would be harmful; 44.9% felt their child might be held responsible if something went wrong, and 28.4% reported it might be too scary for their child. In adjusted models, guardians with prior trauma were more likely to want their child trained (odds ratio [OR] = 3.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-15.50), and identify STB as important to them (OR = 4.07, 95% CI 1.66-12.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results support STB training in high schools, and guardians with a trauma history may be more likely to want their child trained. Further work to understand the perceived potential harm, and work to design trauma-informed first-response trainings is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":225843,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of school health","volume":" ","pages":"345-352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stop the Bleed Training for High School Students: Guardian Attitudes and Their Association with Prior Trauma.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica E McDade, Hannah C Deming, Samara Jinks-Chang, Maria R Paulsen, Anthony L Bui, Monica S Vavilala, Frederick P Rivara, Eileen M Bulger\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/josh.13134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Uncontrolled bleeding is the leading preventable cause of death after injury. Stop the Bleed (STB) is a bleeding control training with proposed expansion into schools. However, the attitudes of guardians, specifically those with past trauma/injury, towards expanding STB into schools are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey evaluated guardian attitudes towards STB training in high schools, and compared responses between guardians based on the experience of prior trauma. Logistic regression models evaluated the association between prior trauma and guardian-reported acceptability of STB training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 750 guardians who received the survey, 484 (64.5%) responded. Most guardians (95.3%) wanted their child trained. Few (4.2%) felt this training would be harmful; 44.9% felt their child might be held responsible if something went wrong, and 28.4% reported it might be too scary for their child. In adjusted models, guardians with prior trauma were more likely to want their child trained (odds ratio [OR] = 3.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-15.50), and identify STB as important to them (OR = 4.07, 95% CI 1.66-12.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results support STB training in high schools, and guardians with a trauma history may be more likely to want their child trained. Further work to understand the perceived potential harm, and work to design trauma-informed first-response trainings is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":225843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of school health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"345-352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of school health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of school health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:不受控制的出血是伤后死亡的主要可预防原因。止血(STB)是一项控制出血的培训,建议扩展到学校。然而,监护人的态度,特别是那些过去有创伤/伤害的人,对将STB扩展到学校的态度尚不清楚。方法:采用横断面调查的方法,评估高中家长对性传播疾病培训的态度,并比较有创伤经历的家长的反应。Logistic回归模型评估了先前创伤与监护人报告的STB培训可接受性之间的关系。结果:在接受调查的750名监护人中,有484名(64.5%)回复。大多数监护人(95.3%)希望他们的孩子接受培训。很少有人(4.2%)认为这种培训是有害的;44.9%的人认为,如果出了问题,他们的孩子可能要承担责任,28.4%的人表示,这对他们的孩子来说可能太可怕了。在调整后的模型中,有过创伤的监护人更希望他们的孩子接受培训(优势比[OR] = 3.50, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.11-15.50),并认为STB对他们很重要(OR = 4.07, 95% CI 1.66-12.26)。结论:我们的研究结果支持在高中开展性传播疾病培训,有创伤史的监护人可能更希望他们的孩子接受培训。进一步的工作,以了解潜在的危害,并设计创伤知情的第一反应培训是必要的。
Stop the Bleed Training for High School Students: Guardian Attitudes and Their Association with Prior Trauma.
Background: Uncontrolled bleeding is the leading preventable cause of death after injury. Stop the Bleed (STB) is a bleeding control training with proposed expansion into schools. However, the attitudes of guardians, specifically those with past trauma/injury, towards expanding STB into schools are unknown.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey evaluated guardian attitudes towards STB training in high schools, and compared responses between guardians based on the experience of prior trauma. Logistic regression models evaluated the association between prior trauma and guardian-reported acceptability of STB training.
Results: Of 750 guardians who received the survey, 484 (64.5%) responded. Most guardians (95.3%) wanted their child trained. Few (4.2%) felt this training would be harmful; 44.9% felt their child might be held responsible if something went wrong, and 28.4% reported it might be too scary for their child. In adjusted models, guardians with prior trauma were more likely to want their child trained (odds ratio [OR] = 3.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-15.50), and identify STB as important to them (OR = 4.07, 95% CI 1.66-12.26).
Conclusion: Our results support STB training in high schools, and guardians with a trauma history may be more likely to want their child trained. Further work to understand the perceived potential harm, and work to design trauma-informed first-response trainings is warranted.